garte

12 ms·

1. 91.▲
   by garte 4y ago

   I'm impressed: the article is about the rich diversity of different sexes in nature (it does not even go into gender) but all you are getting out of it is some anti-woke sentiment? Could you please re-read the article and at least abso
2. 92.▲
   by garte 4y ago

   This thinking seems self-defeating to me and only serves to uphold the status quo or - sadly - make things worse.
3. 93.▲
   by garte 4y ago

   I can't imagine Skynet starting with a Python script...
4. 94.▲
   An Illustrated Guide to Guy Debord’s “The Society of the Spectacle” (2016)(hyperallergic.com)

   2 points by garte 4y ago|0 comments
5. 95.▲
   by garte 4y ago

   A very basic trait of our capitalistic system is that you'll always want more regardless of your actual, personal needs. You're always left wanting, always. And that's by design. "Information" in the current sense (
6. 96.▲
   by garte 4y ago

   Isn't what you're describing simply "being a friend" with an encyclopedia? Why would you want to create a machine to do that if we're made like that? In a sense instead of training a machine you could steer yourself
7. 97.▲
   by garte 4y ago

   The irony is strong in this one: Not building airports would definitely improve the situation as a whole.
8. 98.▲
   by garte 4y ago

   You managed to combine sexism with useless consumerism while missing the point of the article entirely: owning 6 bikes while still using your car for the most part is not sustainable and might even hinder bike adoption in the long run. So w