garrinm

8 ms·

31.
by garrinm 3y ago
Thank you! That's great feedback. Clint is very much a proof-of-concept, I'm sure this idea can be taken much further when done properly. But to get a "pretty neat" from an RN feels like an accomplishment xD. I see what
32.
by garrinm 3y ago
Clint could be short for CLINician Tool. I didn't put much effort into this name xD.
33.
by garrinm 3y ago
Hi, thanks for the comment. I put this project pretty quickly and I don't want to pretend there is tremendous depth behind any of the decisions I made :/. For now the only source is the Stats Pearl book published on ncbi.nlm.nih.g
34.
Show HN: Chat with GPT about medical issues, get answers from medical literature(github.com)
45 points by garrinm 3y ago|19 comments
35.
Show HN: Clint LLM – An Interactive Medical Information and Reasoning Tool(github.com)
1 points by garrinm 3y ago|0 comments
36.
Show HN: Extending ChatGPT with a memory for few shot prompting(github.com)
1 points by garrinm 4y ago|1 comments
37.
by garrinm 4y ago
I agree the description wasn't quite ready for prime time. I will work on the documentation and adding examples.
38.
by garrinm 4y ago
It's using Activity Stream ( https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams/v1 ) which can be represented in RDF or JSON-LD formats. In this case, JSON-LD is used, but this can be easily converted to RDF.
39.
by garrinm 4y ago
To me it's still unclear if having a message traverse the entire graph is good or bad. Something like this is required otherwise this will really just be a chat app, and probably not a very good one at that. What I mean is that if you
40.
by garrinm 4y ago
I have not seen this, thank you for sharing! I will have a look, it does seem interesting.
41.
by garrinm 4y ago
There are lots of similarities indeed. No idea exists on its own, and it is not surprising that there are many others trying to solve the same problems and arriving to similar conclusions. I would consider Chatter Net to be a parallel exper
42.
by garrinm 4y ago
For authenticating messages, Chatter Net uses Linked Data Proofs ( https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-integrity/#proofs ). The JS client uses this implementation: https://github.com/digitalbazaar/cry
43.
by garrinm 4y ago
Unfortunately not at this time, this is very early days for the project.
44.
by garrinm 4y ago
Good question! Right now the client and server talk over HTTP using routes that conform with the Activity Pub spec (everything resource under `/ap` on the server should be a valid Activity Stream document conforming to Activity Pub spe
45.
by garrinm 4y ago
It solves the problem of relying on 3rd party platforms to establish user identity. That is, when Alice wants to hear from Bob, they both have to be authenticated by some 3rd party Acme Corp. Alice can't know that a message is written
46.
by garrinm 4y ago
Thanks for the thoughtful question. Signal to noise, spam, sybil attacks etc. is probably the hardest problem to solve for this project, so I suppose it only makes sense its not really solved. But I hope that Chatter Net offers the tools wh
47.
by garrinm 4y ago
Agree! Chatter Net is built to be self-moderating. The currently implementation (conversely.social) isn't fully using this yet. From the user point of view, the idea is simple: you receive messages only from people you follow. As peopl
48.
by garrinm 4y ago
You bring up some good points. Indeed Chatter Net as-is isn't able to fully integrate in the Fediverse. I think it'll be possible to get there, and I'd like to see the project get there, but in the meantime its more of a stan
49.
by garrinm 4y ago
Pretty much, good observation. The main idea really is just to push identity to the client. Activity Stream is a convenient way to package information, especially if you want to self-sign it and have it be self-descriptive. And Activity Pub
50.
by garrinm 4y ago
Chatter Net doesn't offer a solution to spam / unwanted traffic, but maybe it can give tools for people to create their own solutions. The idea is to have a network of servers, and each can enforce their own rules (the simplest of
51.
by garrinm 4y ago
There used to be a page there, but that's been taken down until more work can be done on it. I pushed this all a bit early, there are a lot of details missing. I'll be spending time documenting things a bit better in the coming da
52.
by garrinm 4y ago
Hi, thanks for the question! I realize I pushed this with some important details missing. As a first objective I'd like to get Chatter Net nodes to be able to consume from the Fediverse. The (small) challenge is that posts in the Fediv
53.
by garrinm 4y ago
Hi thanks for the interest! Oversight from my part I was pushing quite a few things tonight. I just added the MIT license to the server.
54.
Show HN: A decentralized semantic web built atop Activity Pub(github.com)
141 points by garrinm 4y ago|46 comments
55.
by garrinm 5y ago
In fact I see the opposite situation: a closed source algorithm will be protected as a trade secret. So identifying a bias might be harder. And correcting it anyway will still require them to ship a new version. Meanwhile in open source the
56.
Building a software guitar tube amp(resonantdsp.com)
2 points by garrinm 5y ago|0 comments
57.
by garrinm 5y ago
It'd be very hard to make a statement like "Rust can do X that C can't" without there being a statement "You can do Y, then Z in C and that is like X" because clearly they are both Turing complete languages at
58.
Show HN: Guitar tube amp plugin based on spice simulations(github.com)
4 points by garrinm 6y ago|0 comments
59.
Building a tube amplifier emulation audio plug-in(resonantdsp.com)
3 points by garrinm 6y ago|0 comments