garbowza

32 ms·

301.
by garbowza 19y ago
I understand his point, but I think he supports it poorly. Of course a product that has 1 review is not likely to benefit greatly from that single review. But when I buy a product, or book a hotel, I look at dozens of reviews from other peo
302.
by garbowza 19y ago
Finally... I'm not the only one that feels this way! This was a very well articulated essay. I obsessively avoid accumulation of objects because they dilute the actual value (to me, not a dollar amount) of the few things I actually enjoy.
303.
by garbowza 19y ago
Edward de Bono, the so-called grandfather of creativity, describes this approach in his groundbreaking book "Serious Creativity." Basically you always want to generate ideas separately, then expand on them in a group. The reason is that a
304.
How Top Bloggers Earn Money(images.businessweek.com)
11 points by garbowza 19y ago|1 comments
305.
by garbowza 19y ago
I think the techniques that are being developed for consumer Web 2.0 apps will start penetrating the business market. And as mobile phone continue to gain location identification technologies, mobile apps will finally start gaining more mar
306.
by garbowza 19y ago
+1 for learn as you go! The best way to get all the requisite skills is to start building your best idea and letting the project itself tell you what you need to know.
307.
Researchers seek cash for software flaws(boston.com)
2 points by garbowza 19y ago|0 comments
308.
by garbowza 19y ago
Interesting take, epi0Bauqu. I think many hackers struggle with this concept because we are so focused on the creation, that once the product is created we are not sure what's next. And even if we do know, it oftentimes isn't as aligned wit
309.
by garbowza 19y ago
Being a huge sports fan, I am used to people apologizing after the fact and blaming the media for "misrepresentation" and taking their comments "out of context." However, I do applaud Seth Levine for at least addressing the issue. While the
310.
Investors Digg Kevin Rose(msnbc.msn.com)
3 points by garbowza 19y ago|0 comments
311.
by garbowza 19y ago
No, even under "first to file" you cannot patent something where publicly accessible prior art exists. You can never patent something if it already exists in the public. The difference in first to file is that you can't pull up internal, pr
312.
by garbowza 19y ago
Definitely self-serving move, and certainly won't make any difference in the end... articles like the USAToday one always need to find that contrarian view in order to seem unbiased. I'm sure Seth Levine was all to happy to provide them the
313.
by garbowza 19y ago
The nature of email is certainly shifting towards business dealings, as this article states. However, it's more than that: traditional email is also becoming a message aggregator. As social utilities, such as Facebook, MySpace, etc continue
314.
by garbowza 19y ago
The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) actually does perform this function and does include the U.S. It's PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) applications are valid for all member states, so it's essentially like submitting a paten
315.
by garbowza 19y ago
This reform bill quite excellent and much needed, as it focuses on limiting patent litigation and outrageous infringement lawsuits. Shifting from "first to invent" to "first to file" actually helps prevent costly lawsuits. Under the curren
316.
How Open Is Facebook, Really?(readwriteweb.com)
3 points by garbowza 19y ago|1 comments
317.
Splash screen is an admission of failure(moing.org)
8 points by garbowza 19y ago|0 comments