gandhium

18 ms·

121.
by gandhium 9y ago
Surprisingly, there wasn't a single word about 'NATO fueling' in that article.
122.
by gandhium 9y ago
One of those 'revelations', picturing rockets descending on Florida, was a Russian TV clip from 2007. Link (in Russian): https://tvrain.ru/articles/grafiku_iz_filma_2007_goda_na_nej...
123.
by gandhium 9y ago
Well, at least media don't play the Russian-proposed "we were heroic defenders" tune, like it was with Georgia in 2008.
124.
by gandhium 9y ago
Are you implying that US or NATO put their bases and ICBMs in Ukraine?
125.
by gandhium 9y ago
What was the original reason? Sending supplies to Whites when there was no Whites?
126.
by gandhium 9y ago
Did you read that Wiki article? War materials were given to support Tsarist Russia in WW1.
127.
by gandhium 9y ago
J-20 downed zero aircraft as well, as far I as I know.
128.
by gandhium 9y ago
> China has never been expansionist Why they've attacked Vietham then?
129.
by gandhium 9y ago
They've provided troops and supplies to _guard the war materials_.
130.
by gandhium 9y ago
So, what's the difference with "the ORGANIZATION’s monthly budget for Project Lakhta submitted to CONCORD exceeded 73 million Russian rubles (over 1,250,000 U.S. dollars)" ? Why is that statement false?
131.
by gandhium 9y ago
So, the only verified facts are that US troops were securing the materials and defending against Bolshevik attackers.
132.
by gandhium 9y ago
> So when 538 writes "The indictment alleges that an organization called the Internet Research Agency had a monthly budget of approximately $1.25 million toward interference efforts by September 2016" this is simply false Why?
133.
by gandhium 9y ago
Lenin's prodrazvyorstka led to famine. Tsarist razvyorstka - didn't. Major difference. And why you think that Russia would have been the loser in WW1, is beyond me.
134.
by gandhium 9y ago
> due to civil war that the US participated in by providing troops and resources US didn't provide any troops or resources to Russian Civil War. A few clashes with pro-Bolshevik bandits were from Japanese forces.
135.
by gandhium 9y ago
Wow. Looks like you're actively try to downplay this fact.
136.
by gandhium 9y ago
> like a native driver. Considering the amount of traffic-related deaths in Russia... They'd better handle it like non-native driver.
137.
by gandhium 9y ago
> The so-called “troll factory” is pretty old news Why it's old news if they're still trolling? > Either the Russians are exponentially better at advertising than the best minds in the DNC No, just their labour is exponentia
138.
by gandhium 9y ago
Don't think so, those trolls are working on Brexit, Germany, Ukraine and other areas as well.
139.
by gandhium 9y ago
I'd say if Russia wasn't messing with other countries (either by hacking, invading or trying to overthrow governments[0]) blaming something on them will be indeed a problem. But now they're reaping what they sow. [0] - http:
140.
by gandhium 9y ago
One of the early blatant examples - when they've killed their competitor (DR-DOS) by altering Windows 3.1 to work in MS-DOS only.
141.
by gandhium 9y ago
At least Russia now is ready to flung their new technologies to anyone who can pay for them (selling S-400 to Turkey for example). So that _nations_ can have access to pretty advanced technologies.
142.
by gandhium 9y ago
I will address only one line from your post: > Whereas Austria, which Russia had occupied but which did not go remilitarize and join NATO, was withdrawn from by Russia, just like Russia pulled out of Iran and a number of other places as
143.
by gandhium 9y ago
So what caused 'mild traumatic brain injuries'? Mass hysteria?
144.
by gandhium 9y ago
> US, as a return favor, shared their intel on the MH17 incident too. As I can remember US told the world that it MH-17 was shot by a missile (not Ukrainian jet, as Russia tried to imply for months) and most probably Russian missile - an
145.
by gandhium 9y ago
As I said they were afraid that North Korea or Iran will snatch their scientists. So they paid Russians to develop an ISS module: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/structure/element... And they paid
146.
by gandhium 9y ago
Yes, those engines (and ISS parts) were specifically ordered by US to keep Soviet rocket production busy and to avoid their migration to North Korea or Iran.
147.
by gandhium 9y ago
> The original point being disputed was that SU and Soviet people "never achieved much" But they didn't achieve much in reality. That's why they have to copy most of their technologies from other countries during all
148.
by gandhium 9y ago
3 scientists from country with population ~200 million and during 70 years period?
149.
by gandhium 9y ago
Are you suggesting that US is scientifically losing to most countries?
150.
by gandhium 9y ago
Assume? There's tons of info on Russian troll factories, even from insiders who took part in pushing 'Russkiy mir' agenda around.

More ›