gametheoretic

15 ms·

91.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
>Wow that sounds like some kind of german from the distant past, if at any time we spoke that way. Don't get me wrong! It just sounds, let's say interesting :-) Hahaha. Vor 3-4 Jahren könnte ich etwas besseres produzieren, aber
92.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
Boom, what a closer. Deutscher, eine Frage - warum haben die Piraten so wenig Erfolg? Im Gefolge von NSA, usw., meine ich.
93.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
I applaud your approach and don't know whether your conclusion is correct. But if it's not, it's for reasons right in front of you - TC ain't doing any investing. An invite to participate at Disrupt is less like a "
94.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
Everywhere, pedigree counts. Silicon Valley ∈ Everywhere, whether it likes it or not.
95.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
>If there were truly big stakes attached to that exam then there would be a lot more than 340 people out of 150,000 getting a perfect score. That, and we're all blissfully unaware of what fraction of that 150k participated in the co
96.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
The highlighted section was not in reference to 2008. It was in defense of masculine bullshitting, which has its time and place just like everything else. Especially at poker tables. Who buys CDS? Mom and Pop? If a used car salesman sells G
97.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
Try rewriting that sentence without passive voice, see what you find.
98.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
> Where has adding women to a previous male bastion caused reduced performance? MDs? Parliamentarians? Senior corporate executives? I made no positive claims, only negative ones. >Imagine if we had had ibankers who stopped to think &q
99.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
Other than the ad networks, who's surviving and growing their business off of ads, really? Like, who's in the business of ad clicks and the business of content? TechCrunch, et al. So, handshake coverage deals, just like now. Samsu
100.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
If your use of the word 'compelling' is in reference to the contents of that link, well, I just could not disagree more. a) Surveys are shit - they're as far removed from double-blind as you can get, and b) the framing of cau
101.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
>quotas seem to be the direction that Westernized societies are heading for in the 21st century. Explicit quotas are a big no-no in the U.S. (where most things are concerned - you can find exceptions here and there). See, for example in
102.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
>"Any port in a storm." as the saying goes. Love the humor, usbcondoms crew! Another one I hope you find a place for in the future: "In the dark, all cats are gray" -- Benjamin Franklin. Yes, really.
103.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
Amen. Furthermore, if diversity in thought is the goal, surely diversity across nationality and even age produces the greater aggregate effect, no? I.e., if the starting point of discussion were only ever how best to increase diversity of t
104.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
Yea and nay - as always with IT, the answer is "it depends". My background is with telecom giants. 'Round those parts, ain't nobody B'ing their own D. If a company does anything for the government, it may as well do
105.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
Ask an IT guy. The internals on the 990 desktop series >>> the 960 series >>> the whatever... 600-somethings, etc. Continual improvement, model after model. When you're dealing with thousands of employees, ease of int
106.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
Uh, Netflix has a killer edge within their industry that every other company in the world wishes they had in their own. They should keep doing exactly what the fuck they're doing, and not listen to what anybody else thinks. The peanut
107.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
>Who says women do not have the fortitude to not shower for days and live off cold pizza? Why is everything always about what people are 'saying'? "Who says girls can't play football." Nobody, in the most exactin
108.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
What would you say the NBA prizes, fortitude or height? One to a point - the other immeasurably.
109.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
Whose side would Freud be on? See: 'Partial Object', particularly its canonical example. (My point here is the term, not the man.)
110.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
dat full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYBPotROKC8 Replace, and I'll delete this one.
111.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
"Sorry, Gary. Come talk to me when you have 558 friends. Gare? I'm sorry, Gare, those are the rules. Everyone has to be equal. It doesn't matter if you'll never have 558 friends and I only had to find 32. Everyone's
112.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
A = {all areas ∈ Tech | TNY's staff can cover the area at the level they cover other beats} B = {all areas ∈ Tech | area interests TNY readership} A ∩ B = ________
113.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
Not a "challenge" or anything: do you do hackathons? When you know you're not going to win, but also know you're going to be on stage later, an intentionally and blatantly stupid app is the way to go.
114.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
Q: Cui bono? /provocateur
115.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
It's misogynistic by that hip, new definition of misogynistic that doesn't mean misogynistic.
116.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
Would you be explaining the joke if you were to note that no non-trivial solutions exist for n?
117.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
I don't get it. :(
118.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
Sean! I love you! My sister, 14 next month, was diagnosed ~18 months ago with UC. Everything has been such a roller coaster for her, it's been unbearable. On and off this and that medication, etc, etc - after reading through crohnology
119.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
Uh, perhaps the above commenter "ignores" said disproportionality because it's so beyond platitudinal that it doesn't bear repeating but rather is taken as a given starting point for any discussion on the matter.
120.
by gametheoretic 13y ago
This reminds of the famous tea kettle parable.

More ›