galaxyLogic

7 ms·

61.
by galaxyLogic 3mo ago
The more things change, the more they stay the same
62.
by galaxyLogic 3mo ago
Some people say they "hate" AI. But in my view that is misguided. AI is a "tool" in the sense that humans use it for their own purposes. We should hate people who use it for bad purposes, not the tools they are using.
63.
by galaxyLogic 3mo ago
I've noticed that, they often if not always try to make their headlines "witty"
64.
by galaxyLogic 3mo ago
Could it be that the learning samples from the web are already censored and therefore AI just follows suite?
65.
by galaxyLogic 3mo ago
> A signal informs to the degree it resists prediction. Let me offer a counter-point: A signal informs to the degree it lets the recipient infer the intention of the sender A signal has mathematical properties. For instance the vatiation
66.
AI chatbots are at risk of spreading government restrictions on online speech(msn.com)
4 points by galaxyLogic 3mo ago|3 comments
67.
Linus Torvalds tells AI haters to fork off(theregister.com)
15 points by galaxyLogic 3mo ago|9 comments
68.
Prominent Haskell defector pilloried by anti-AI purists(theregister.com)
3 points by galaxyLogic 3mo ago|4 comments
69.
by galaxyLogic 3mo ago
In other words humans are teaching the AI.
70.
by galaxyLogic 3mo ago
Yes I think the problem is not that AI "has all the answers". It is that we don't have "all the questions". If we don't understand the whole of what AI produces for us, we can't ask it to make parts of it
71.
Meta on course to become America's next big cloud provider(theregister.com)
4 points by galaxyLogic 3mo ago|0 comments
72.
by galaxyLogic 3mo ago
I wonder, LLMs have progressed at great speed, because they have learned to duplicate what humans did and recorded in the documents and source-code that became the training materials for the LLMs. But now that humans don't write any
73.
by galaxyLogic 3mo ago
Mature tech evolves more slowly. Think about cars, there's nothing new about them any more. But wait, what about electic cars? Aren't they a new thing? And driverless cars. And soon flying taxis. Automobiles are an old invention
74.
by galaxyLogic 3mo ago
And the amount of logic needed to understand code, including how to fix it or modify it further depends on how complicated the code-structure is. I wonder about this: Does LLM write better code in a better language? Humans often have more d
75.
by galaxyLogic 3mo ago
I assume there's a clear technical reason why GOTO is harmful, it adds to the complexity of the code, makes it harder to understand and fix and evolve. Wouldn't the same difficulties affect the LLMs ability to understand and fix a
76.
by galaxyLogic 3mo ago
Interesting. Can someone quickly summarize their results? Are they saying that using languages with simpler syntax Lisp lead to LLM being able to generalize their knowledge better?
77.
by galaxyLogic 3mo ago
I'm thinking that there should be some standard for Agent-LLM communications, and the simpler the better. Lisp might be such a simpler standard as opposed to JSON.
78.
by galaxyLogic 3mo ago
> JSON is literally a subset of the JavaScript language Isn't it more like when you write JSON in JavaScript you write it as a String? JavaScript has the data-type "String" but does it also have a built-in data-type &quot
79.
by galaxyLogic 3mo ago
A Lisp program that writes a Lisp program really just needs to produce a list of (nested lists) of tokens. A JavaScript program that writes a javascript program needs to generate a string that is syntactically valid JavaScript code. That is
80.
by galaxyLogic 3mo ago
I always wonder when I see a picture of a cockpit of an airplane how many meters there are. Don't know why they need so many, what meters do you need to fly a plane?
81.
Former GitHub CEO launches competitor designed for the age of vibe coding(theregister.com)
5 points by galaxyLogic 3mo ago|3 comments
82.
by galaxyLogic 3mo ago
Sounds like my code. They may have been trained on my code!
83.
by galaxyLogic 3mo ago
> trying to reduce the social damage they are going to do. I'm worried about that in particular because when I started using AI I often felt I wanted to say something nice to it, like just "thanks" after I got someting wo
84.
by galaxyLogic 3mo ago
THere is something to it I assume. Less is someties more/ COnstraints make it interesting, and challenging. There is a modern-day similar thing. In MSN news-site the main news-article automatically steps though a loop. You can manually
85.
by galaxyLogic 3mo ago
So anybody can do anything with the content you have uploadded to instagram. You can always have AI-image which really is the original
86.
by galaxyLogic 3mo ago
So I guess we should ask the agent to write such a script, UNLESS there already exists such a script and we have used it before so we know it worked at least in the past. Else if the agent creates a new script evry time the non-determinism
87.
by galaxyLogic 3mo ago
BUt there is hope https://finance.yahoo.com/technology/ai/articles/amd-amd-buy...
88.
by galaxyLogic 3mo ago
So part of it seems to be working together: I link to your site with the expectation that you link back to mine. Not a bad idea, also letting the site-creators coordinate who focuses on which sub-topic. But are there many examples of this i
89.
by galaxyLogic 3mo ago
I think Agents need user-accounts on your machine, and for us an easy way to configure the permissions each agent has, and then we dont' have to worry about sandboxing so much. This approach was pioneered by smart-phone OSes like Andr
90.
by galaxyLogic 3mo ago
Not sure I get it. Why a "ring"? Why not just have a list of web-site URLs on a page and share that page with your friends and ask them to put that page somewhere on their site? "Ring" means you are navigating linearly a

More ›