galad87

19 ms·

211.
by galad87 6y ago
Probably because there were no contributor interested in porting it to macOS. There is some activity on https://github.com/PCSX2/pcsx2/issues/18 , it seems the biggest issue is that the PCSX2 JIT is 32bit onl
212.
by galad87 6y ago
Actually iMovie on macOS is based con FCPX.
213.
by galad87 7y ago
iOS 7 was a rushed redesign. It took 5 years to fix many of those issues.
214.
by galad87 7y ago
That's the iOS version. All the security issues are on the macOS version (that's not on the Mac App Store and it's not sandboxed)
215.
by galad87 7y ago
Apple didn't review or accept Zoom. It's not on the App Store.
216.
by galad87 7y ago
Which frameworks? AppKit is mostly stable, even too stable.
217.
by galad87 7y ago
It wouldn't be an issue if the app was sandboxed. And I see no reason for a video conferencing to not be sandboxed or to implement similar privilege restrictions.
218.
by galad87 7y ago
10.15 beta shipped with a new iCloud implemented with NSFileProvider. But it was buggy, so they reverted to the old implementation for the final release.
219.
by galad87 7y ago
Parallels Desktop 15 support DX11 on macOS 10.14.4 and later.
220.
by galad87 7y ago
It's an issue in Steam database, not in the games. It shows the "this game is not compatible" message, but the games can still run.
221.
by galad87 7y ago
But it's up to the games developers to set up the compatibility flag, and many are wrong. See https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17DkOsI9AwAT4dzPkLmun...
222.
by galad87 7y ago
Fortunately they were toned down in 10.2.
223.
by galad87 7y ago
Snow Leopard was one of the best after two years of bug fixes.
224.
by galad87 7y ago
And yet there are more indie games for macOS than for Linux. Life is weird.
225.
by galad87 7y ago
If I remember correctly a company working with Apple had access to QuickTime source code, and this company just reused QuickTime when Intel and Microsoft approached it to create a video player.
226.
by galad87 7y ago
And then they added the Files app and brought back all the classic file handling. Because it was impossible to work with files siloed inside apps.
227.
by galad87 7y ago
Notarization is an automated process. It's not a human-made review.
228.
by galad87 7y ago
Right, signed apps will requires to be notarized. Unsigned apps will run like before with either right-click open or by clicking open in System Preferences -> Security.
229.
by galad87 7y ago
No it won't stop working. The only software that will stop working (and in 10.14 too) is software that was only signed and not notarized after 1 June. If the software was signed before 1 June, it will continue to work. Unsigned softwar
230.
by galad87 7y ago
You don't. But even before you couldn't sign an app without paying Apple, because the only valid certificates (Developer ID) are distributed by Apple (with the $99 Developer program).
231.
by galad87 7y ago
10.15 requires signed apps that were signed after 1 July (or June, I don't remember exactly) to be notarized. If you were running a signed after 1 July app but not notarized, that explains it. Even though you can run unsigned app easil
232.
by galad87 7y ago
Nothing will break. Apps signed before will continue to work like before, apps signed now will required to be notarized. Unsigned apps will work like before.
233.
by galad87 7y ago
Signed apps are required to be notarized. Unsigned app will run like before (right click -> open in Finder).
234.
by galad87 7y ago
Notarization is an automated process, it's not an app review, there is no "begging". Anyway, you can just run unsigned apps on macOS.
235.
by galad87 7y ago
You could have done the same with Carbon to Cocoa: transition a window/view at a time. You can use Cocoa windows and views in Carbon. Plus you can keep using your C++ core even if the UI is Cocoa. The same applies to Swift, you can wri
236.
by galad87 7y ago
Carbon UI framework has been deprecated for 12 years. Cocoa has been available since the first Mac OS X version, so ~20 years ago, and it's still be main UI framework on macOS, and it will still be for years. You can't come now an
237.
by galad87 7y ago
But you can still use ad-blockers in Safari… it's not like now it's impossible to block ads in Safari…
238.
by galad87 7y ago
They have one for iOS.
239.
by galad87 7y ago
That's a client side feature meant to save disk space.
240.
by galad87 7y ago
macOS already ask the user for permission the first time an app tries to use a camera/microphone. If you want to be asked each time, install OverSight.

More ›