g_sch

19 ms·

151.
by g_sch 9y ago
> Residents might be less likely to rally against a new project, the thinking goes, if it means their new neighbors will be teachers and firefighters in addition to those receiving housing subsidies. I suppose the implication here is tha
152.
by g_sch 10y ago
It's easy to poll high support numbers for things like "border security" if you avoid the details of what that means. For decades, border security did not mean explicitly banning the entry of all people coming from certain
153.
by g_sch 10y ago
Nonetheless, public transit is an immensely popular way of getting around in cities all over the world, and it comes with the advantage of providing greater access at lower cost than privately owned transportation. There are many people wil
154.
by g_sch 10y ago
The article actually discusses the DNC email hack, and nowhere in the article does it allege that any election systems were compromised. The lexical ambiguity in the headline is not optimal, true, especially when allegations of the latter s
155.
by g_sch 10y ago
The argument is very simple when you consider that the causality may run in the opposite direction. If economic opportunity in an area declines, people become poorer and/or leave. This results in a housing oversupply in addition to a
156.
by g_sch 10y ago
Isn't this because deep pagination is really costly? I've seen other production systems (especially using elasticsearch) where this limit is in place. From Elastic: >Deep Paging in Distributed Systems >To understand why deep
157.
by g_sch 10y ago
I'd be interested to see what kind of hidden biases this might reveal, especially about people, e.g. skin tone, eye color, etc.
158.
by g_sch 10y ago
At least in the United States, a non-rabid wolf has never killed a person in the lower 48 states. Ever.[0] And there used to be millions of wolves in the US. [0] from Vicious: Wolves and Men in America by Jon T. Coleman, Yale University P