g947o

21 ms·

361.
by g947o 10mo ago
> Most of the “overhead” and “security nightmare” worries assume the worst possible setup with zero curation and bad ops. You'll be surprised to learn that these are extremely common, even in large corporations. Security practice is
362.
by g947o 10mo ago
There are many good points, but unfortunately the title ("fad") and the conclusion seem unwarranted, become a distraction and diminish the value of the article. The security issue has been discussed many times in the past year. Ag
363.
by g947o 10mo ago
Hmm... the figures basically vanished under dark mode.
364.
by g947o 10mo ago
The simplest thing is not to do anything but defer to caller to handle it, in languages like Python, Java, JavaScript. Often that is also the only realistic way to an error, especially for library code.
365.
by g947o 10mo ago
My experience is that Perplexity is slightly better at providing facts than ChatGPT (in default mode), probably because (almost) everything comes from a source, not just the model's training set. Although Perplexity does mess up number
366.
by g947o 10mo ago
Linking this anecdote to anti-vaxxing really seems a stretch, and I would like to see the reasoning behind that. My impression is that anti-vaxxers have more issues with vaccines themselves than with doctors who recommend them
367.
by g947o 10mo ago
Just looked it up on Google Maps. Have to say it's not exactly what I would expect from a restaurant... but makes sense in Vegas though.
368.
by g947o 10mo ago
And I know 100 such products that are making $100k/month, do you believe me or not? I'm afraid your numbers are not any more informative or useful than mine.
369.
by g947o 10mo ago
Friendly reminder: the comment is under a post that is hyping the capability of LLMs.
370.
by g947o 10mo ago
If you want to split hairs, sure. It does not help anyone who is considering buying a laptop.
371.
by g947o 10mo ago
> Voilà: bold text, emojis, and plenty of sycophancy – every trick in the LMArena playbook! – to avoid answering the question it was asked. This is hard to swallow. I don't believe a single word this article says. Apparently the &qu
372.
by g947o 10mo ago
This deserves more upvotes. Even if there is a "fully vibe-coded" product that has real customers, the fact that it's vibe-coded means that others can do the same. Unless you have a secret LLM or some magical prompts that mak
373.
by g947o 10mo ago
> if you put in the work you can have awesome performance. Then why would I pay money for a Qualcomm device just for more suffering? Unless I personally like tinkering or I am contributing to an open source project specifically for this,
374.
by g947o 10mo ago
Your comment appears to address the question "why use Windows" (even though the answer doesn't really make sense to me), but that's not the question asked in GP. The question was "Why buy a Windows on ARM device&quo
375.
by g947o 10mo ago
Or for an experimental device that has reached its EOL with no support for either software or hardware. I would just completely disable Windows Update, act as if the computer is already compromised, and only do work where security is not an
376.
by g947o 10mo ago
As soon as I saw that I lost interest in reading it. Asked ChatGPT to summarize it for me. (If they used AI to create the article and put these baits in there, I might as well skip all the nonsense and let AI consume it for me.)
377.
by g947o 10mo ago
I don't assume everyone can think of that next step. If I were that smart, I would not be writing a blog article just talking about using LLM to create new projects/tools outside production environment, because the same thing has
378.
by g947o 10mo ago
Especially when 90% of these articles are based on personal, anecdotally evidence and keep repeating the same points without offering anything new. If these articles actually provide quantitative results in a study done across an organizati
379.
by g947o 10mo ago
> do your own profiling and consider your own targets before blindly accepting a one-size-fits-all configuration for your linter Too bad ESLint has been recommending airbnb as the style until 2024. You can't expect everyone to start
380.
by g947o 10mo ago
> I just gave up and accepted it > lets everyone move past discussing such details in perpetuity That's definitely a reasonable attitude towards coding standards generally. However, in this case, there are "better" esli
381.
by g947o 10mo ago
> Their only argument for not supporting eg. "for-of" is because of "legacy" browsers not supporting it. Not really, their rational is written in the document I linked -- Why? This enforces our immutable rule. D
382.
by g947o 10mo ago
I know. Which is why I completely got rid of airbnb rules in my personal projects or projects that I control. I wasted so much time fighting those stupid rules instead of actually writing code.
383.
by g947o 10mo ago
The site might as well just silently use cookies and save the banner if it's going to ignore GDPR or EU anyway.
384.
by g947o 10mo ago
Funny enough, for-of is not allowed in Airbnb eslint config, and you are expected to use forEach instead: https://github.com/airbnb/javascript/issues/1122 https://github.com/airbnb/javasc
385.
by g947o 10mo ago
> as long as it’s easy to turn off or uninstall That's the issue here. The "disable all AI features" option isn't really easy to find.
386.
by g947o 10mo ago
Oh, I use coding assistants every day, just not the one that came with VSCode. Because I want to decide if/which coding assistant I want to use, not whatever VSCode forces upon me. In fact, at many companies, GitHub Copilot is explicit
387.
by g947o 10mo ago
Make it opt-in only at welcome page, and we have a deal. (Of course, I know that's never going to happen.)
388.
by g947o 10mo ago
212 is still a large number compared to Meta's Reality Labs which is downsizing.
389.
by g947o 10mo ago
Those who want to complain about the snowflake animations, wait till you try out the dark mode
390.
by g947o 10mo ago
Well, I guess you haven't tried its "dark mode" yet

More ›