Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
g051051
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
45 ms
·
421.
▲
by
g051051
8y ago
> So does contraception, yet we don't consider people using it mentally ill. Boy, you got that backwards. Abstinence is what "goes against our very nature as living beings". Contraception allows us to engage in sexual ac
422.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
FireFox constantly broke all my extensions with just about every minor update. It was maddening. After being a die-hard FireFox/Netscape/Mozilla user since the 90's, I finally gave up a few years back and switched to Chro
423.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
Chrome makes continuous small changes. It doesn't make big breaking changes every 6 months, whether the community and ecosystem are ready or not.
424.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
This is the same strategy that wrecked Eclipse and Firefox. Every 6 months is just too quick for most people to feel comfortable, and will cause fragmentation as the 3rd party ecosystem updates things at different rates.
425.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
Negligence would be if they knew about the bug but ignored it, which per a later Bloomberg article isn't what happened. Instead, there was a process failure so that they thought the bug was patched, when it wasn't.
426.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
> Which means they aren't legally bound not to release your credit report to whomever they want (aka whoever pays them) Also, this isn't true. Purchasers must have "permissible purpose", which is regulated.
427.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
Most of those exceptions Equifax listed seem to be the same as on the government site you linked to: pre-screened credit offers, government agencies, debt collection, etc.
428.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
IANAL, so it may not be "Precedent" with a capital P, but it is a court ruling and the guy put a huge amount of crazy stuff into it that other crazies can now point to and say "see, a judge agreed with all of this".
429.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
It does look like that now, for Equifax. Lock & Alert, as they call it, is free. https://www.equifax.com/personal/products/credit/credit-lock... I'm certain the other agencies are hard at work impl
430.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
They probably don't care about the cost, it's the precedent they're trying to block or overturn. And I don't see how even the appeal can stand against further appeals (or whatever they do next to protest what they consi
431.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
Really? I'm 54, and constantly have to turn away recruiters who pester me. Long haul is looking pretty good, right now anyway. Even if you're a junior dev, outlooks can change and shift...it's all about staying relevant an
432.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
It's not my view, it's my manager's view, as well as simple math.
433.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
5 years for me, and counting. I'm so much happier and more productive, especially since where I work went to an open plan office: bright, noisy, visual distractions everywhere, speakerphones on every desk, little "huddle" ta
434.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
The point you keep missing is that the amount I'm paid more isn't equivalent to the amount more I can do than a junior dev. I perform at some X more than the junior dev, but I'm not paid X more.
435.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
> Aye, but you probably can't code faster if you have to read a manual first? If we both had to read the manual? Yeah, I'd still be faster. It's just as easy to cherry-pick for one side or another.
436.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
Actually, the context that you're ignoring is important: > I'm so much more effective that it's always cheaper to have me do it, assuming I don't have a higher priority task (in which case it's a non-issue, since
437.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
> I personally would welcome as much strategic and intellectual diversity as possible onto teams I'm running. Me too. I just think the blanket assertion that a junior dev is the coding equal to a senior dev is what's nutty.
438.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
My cost is less by doing more in the same amount of time.
439.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
None of that has anything to do with the original blanket assertion of "good junior devs can code not only "just as fast", but probably faster too!".
440.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
> Aren't you spending time thinking? Do you imagine you think faster than everybody aged 23? No, but I probably think better ...i.e. how to approach a problem, sift out the relevant details, formulate a plan, execute it, understand
441.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
And I'm saying that your arguments are wrong. I don't care how good the junior dev is, I can out code them every time. > If you're working on the premise "we can’t afford to have our senior developers mentor juniors&
442.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
> The OP is saying: given two senior applicants with the same coding skill level, the one most suited to the job is the person who can communicate to juniors and delegate effectively. If that's what he was saying, I'd be much m
443.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
You do what your team and company needs. If they need me to work on a big re-engineering project, or build a core framework feature, I do it. If they need me to get onto a regular sprint team for a while and churn out the backlog, I do it
444.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
> Your reading comprehension suffers under your fragile ego. Nobody said 'senior developers shouldn't be coding'. That is exactly what the post I was responding to said, and I've quoted it several times. Here it is a
445.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
A deep understanding of your tool set is a huge advantage.
446.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
> I am flabbergasted that you're senior and measure your productivity in "code produced". What is that, LOC? Can type faster than a recent graduate? Who uses LOC? I'm talking about completed, tested, accepted feature
447.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
> I don't view the value I add as "can code features faster" I do, at least partly. I can code so much faster that my cost per feature is lower than a junior dev.
448.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
I directly disputed the central thesis that OP (the person I was responding to, not the article) was putting forth, that senior developers shouldn't be coding: > You don't hire senior devs to code - good junior devs can code no
449.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
I can point to my well documented track record: code reviews, bonuses, promotions, code longevity, metrics, etc. as evidence. I can code multiple features in the time that a junior dev does one, even with me mentoring them. That doesn
450.
▲
by
g051051
9y ago
I do. But I'm still faster than them in head to head coding throughput (code produced, error counts, etc). I've got decades of experience in developing software. No way someone fresh out of college is going to equal, let alone
More ›