fzzzy

33 ms·

511.
by fzzzy 5y ago
No, that's an easy way to get fired.
512.
by fzzzy 5y ago
Where we're going, we don't need wheels.
513.
by fzzzy 5y ago
Yes. Waste of time and money.
514.
by fzzzy 5y ago
It's a huge waste of time to do this just because some people that are about to die "like" buying things in bizarre units.
515.
by fzzzy 5y ago
So what is the point of them doing this then?
516.
by fzzzy 5y ago
What heat was there which affected building 7?
517.
by fzzzy 5y ago
They were not fed unnatural diets which caused them to produce a shitload of methane.
518.
by fzzzy 5y ago
because they love it
519.
by fzzzy 5y ago
Thanks for being so honest and being willing to reevaluate your stance given life experience.
520.
by fzzzy 5y ago
brand name
521.
by fzzzy 5y ago
Joe Rogan doesn't care about influence.
522.
by fzzzy 5y ago
You hated it so much you made it your hacker news handle! I, too, hate leetcode.
523.
by fzzzy 5y ago
The user doesn't notice, but it stifles innovation at that level of the stack.
524.
by fzzzy 5y ago
At one point a lot of people only got school up to 8th grade. Then eventually everybody is going to school up to the 12th grade. Maybe in the future it will just be customary to go all the way through 4 years of college.
525.
by fzzzy 5y ago
This made me laugh out loud.
526.
by fzzzy 5y ago
Adderall is just amphetamene, not methamphetamene. And the study doesn't draw any conclusions about amphetamine.
527.
by fzzzy 5y ago
We could do this by shifting the bulk of online communication to private/ephemeral spaces. The stuff that wants to be cataloged and searched would just be whatever is left in public. I am pro.
528.
by fzzzy 5y ago
Thank you for some sanity.
529.
by fzzzy 5y ago
Also "my employer" lololololololoolol
530.
by fzzzy 5y ago
"200 is a big company to have none" I can't parse this sentence. Are you saying 200 people without managers in untenable? Because I know for a fact that is not true.
531.
by fzzzy 5y ago
Management is not only hard but also populated with sadists, because they are the only ones willing to manage.
532.
by fzzzy 5y ago
What's your excuse for being with a world where dominance and submission is tolerated as a requirement to survive?
533.
by fzzzy 5y ago
That's correct. I believe firms should not have more than 200 employees, based on life experience.
534.
by fzzzy 5y ago
Robot self cleaning toilets? For fuck's sake
535.
by fzzzy 5y ago
"The only complaint the business owner seems to have is that the employee isn't in a desperate financial situation and thus has control over her life decisions." This is the sad situation we are in presently.
536.
by fzzzy 5y ago
Managers should not have leverage over employees. Any management is simply, straight up, abuse. Sorry not sorry your chosen profession was not viable. That's not my fault.
537.
by fzzzy 5y ago
Sorry, but you are just straight up wrong. Even if reforestation percentage has increased in recent years, the derivative of forest is still negative, and the reforestation is new growth, which as I mentioned is not as ecologically useful.
538.
by fzzzy 5y ago
You understand that old growth forest and new growth forest have completely different ecological profiles, right? False equivalence. Regreening of new growth forest does not make up for the same amount of area as old growth.
539.
by fzzzy 5y ago
No, it's just that there is not as much forest that is as easily exploitable as there was in the 80s, so of course the rate has to go down. We already cut most of it down. [edit] forest cover is still going down. we are not increasing
540.
by fzzzy 5y ago
Do you hate regular cruise control? How is that not partial self driving?

More ›