Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
fxd123
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
61.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
What information would this send to the third-party (you and/or OpenAI)? I assume from this demo at the very minimum the database structure? Does the post processing after the LLM response run on the customers' servers?
62.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
The operating system shows when the microphone is turned on.
63.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
(1) I already talk about plenty without getting targeted ads (2) Android is open source and I'm familiar with the core codebase as part of my job (3) Even if I get an ad after talking about a product, that isn't proof (hence my co
64.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
Classic confirmation bias.
65.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
That's not a bad thing
66.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
The point was we don't need to invent new taxes
67.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
No
68.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
Wealth is explicitly not income, so I don't know how any person would interpret a wealth tax being constitutional.
69.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
> What the Tax Foundation isn't saying: plaintiffs want the supreme court to preemptively strike down the possiblity of a federal wealth tax. You are talking about this like it's a bad thing. It absolutely should be struck down
70.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
And yet, countries without unrealized gains taxes still have courts, police, and military.
71.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
Collateral is explicitly not tangible and usable. The whole point of collateral is that the unrealized gains are held in a illiquid limbo
72.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
Yes, as long as they can avoid shooting rockets at their neighbors. Which is sadly not the case right now
73.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
I didn't ask where you live, but ok?
74.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
> Can you imagine that all it took for her to lose her job was "“Freedom for Palestine”. Which she said after Israel was a victim of a terrorist attack. Quite tone deaf, no?
75.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
As I already said in another comment: > It's almost as if Israel has defensive technology (Iron Dome) to protect their citizens from Palestine's rocket attacks that target civilian areas (which is a war crime)
76.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
> People don't want a reciprocal death count from Israel Unfortunately, many people in this thread do want that > they want them to resist escalation I want Hamas to resist escalation too. Why has Hamas broken every ceasefire in
77.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
Is there a reason why you created an account specifically for this comment thread?
78.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
> Although the law is largely symbolic
79.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
It's almost as if Israel has defensive technology (Iron Dome) to protect their citizens from Palestine's rocket attacks that target civilian areas (which is a war crime)
80.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
> which also included a denunciation of the “Zionist ideology which promotes an exclusivist state,” That's an interesting claim, since Israel is definitely not a exclusivist state. Yet again, 'anti-zionism' seems to be u
81.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
The security council does have binding resolutions.
82.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
Title makes it seem like the U.N. can dictate this. It's a non-binding resolution.
83.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
"Universal Acclaim" being a phrase metacritic associates with a 8.5 score- from a whopping 509 reviews. Not very universal
84.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
> but I wish > I do not care Stop trying to make the author's article about yourself
85.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
You are welcome to share your own opinion, but don't say things like "generally considered" when it's just not true...
86.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
I enjoyed it but "best written shows of the 2010s" is an exaggeration
87.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
> Civil trials cost you money, so obviously the standard is lower ... ... ...
88.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
And the preponderance standard for civil cases is "over 50% likelihood". That's not very strong.
89.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
...what?
90.
▲
by
fxd123
3y ago
> agreed the French cuisine is the best of them both OK, but that's not what the article is about. The writer is talking about "good food culture", not "good food"
More ›