fuzz4lyfe

44 ms·

421.
by fuzz4lyfe 8y ago
I've had negative reviews flat out removed by a company that was paying glass door for some sort of premium service. I extensively reviewed the rules and reworded my comments and they were removed yet again. My points were fully factua
422.
by fuzz4lyfe 8y ago
I'm not sure I understand could you go into more detail?
423.
by fuzz4lyfe 8y ago
Those goals seem to require each other as opposed to being mutually exclusive.
424.
by fuzz4lyfe 8y ago
That New York Times article is interesting, if it is indeed illegal to target propaganda to American citizens it seems that VOA did so in violation of law and only stopped when caught doing so. That leads me to one of three conclusions: 1:
425.
by fuzz4lyfe 8y ago
In my life I have modified the golden rule like so: "do unto others as they would do unto you" I have found that my modification allows the golden rule to work in cases where the person you are interacting with is less moral or ho
426.
by fuzz4lyfe 8y ago
The ask the manager answer is actually located here: https://www.inc.com/alison-green/i-found-out-my-coworker-is-... It looks like that link is just a stub for it
427.
by fuzz4lyfe 8y ago
I noted that myself, rather suspiciously western media failed to cover it at the time. I can find the text for the bill and prove that he signed it via official government sources but business insider is the only reasonably reputable source
428.
by fuzz4lyfe 8y ago
In the case of slander, defamation and libel you have to prove that the words caused you harm, for example you lost a job due to a lie. A simple lie isn't enough to sue. A childish example: "HN user api loves to eat poop" isn
429.
by fuzz4lyfe 8y ago
It's worth noting that US propaganda operations even on US soil are not unprecedented. During his tenure Obama signed a national defense authorization act[0][1] that some claim has re-legalized propaganda operations on US citizens. The
430.
by fuzz4lyfe 8y ago
I believe you need to prove a monetary loss of some kind to have standing to sue. The situations that I can think of that result from misinformation that cause a monetary loss are probably already considered fraud.