Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
furyofantares
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
180 ms
·
2521.
▲
by
furyofantares
15y ago
Can we agree that limiting the career opportunities of your employees and firing recruiters who will not take part in this illegal practice is nothing like taking away bagels or personalizing search results? It's very close to the regular
2522.
▲
by
furyofantares
15y ago
If they believe it's encrypted data containing incriminating evidence, and you refuse to decrypt it, you may be charged with obstruction of justice. You have no need to prove it isn't actually encrypted data. All you must do is debunk wha
2523.
▲
by
furyofantares
15y ago
It is not true. Facebook uses this: http://three20.info/
2524.
▲
by
furyofantares
15y ago
An employee with a 100k salary costs something like 200k to the employer. Contractors also expect a bit of a premium due to getting sporadic work, if they didn't get a premium they'd opt for stable work instead. In exchange for this premi
2525.
▲
by
furyofantares
15y ago
They are already anchored at the maximum salary they'll pay you, and you are anchored at the minimum salary you'll accept, but neither of you knows each other's numbers. They want to hit somewhere above your minimum. They don't want to hit
2526.
▲
by
furyofantares
15y ago
> An open internet is more important than security, copyright infringement, terrorism or child pornography. I'm not sure this sentence does what you want it to do. It implies these things are all a similar level of evil, and it makes it
2527.
▲
by
furyofantares
15y ago
How many?
2528.
▲
by
furyofantares
15y ago
> The reason I ask is because most of the people who have been getting arrested seem to be people of Iranian descent who chose to move to another country. Or are those just the ones you hear about? The article suggests there have been
2529.
▲
by
furyofantares
15y ago
> I guess my question comes down to what is the difference between contributing to whichever campaign forwards a platform and bribery (the assumption that Dodd was engaging in the latter being what caused the furor)? Dodd's implication