funthree

18 ms·

121.
by funthree 15y ago
There are a number of reasons why you might want to use jquery directly from the server. Some off the top of my head... -You can keep your application code hidden from prying eyes -You only serve up ~120kb of javascript to the client no mat
122.
NodeQuery is a realtime server-side DOM API(github.com)
104 points by funthree 15y ago|24 comments
123.
by funthree 15y ago
Without going into too much detail about it your assumption is only partly true. It depends on how many API calls you make to jquery from the server, but also sending your realtime data in HTML actually doesnt suck (your server already ren
124.
by funthree 15y ago
You are right, at first I did do it just to see if it was possible. I've been meaning to write in more detail about some of the implications, clean up some of the code, etc. I've also experimented with the API to feel out how it could wor
125.
by funthree 15y ago
Speaking of backend DOM awareness, have you seen this? https://github.com/tblobaum/nodeQuery
126.
by funthree 15y ago
It is not "Google etc., multi-billion dollar corporations" it is just Google.
127.
by funthree 15y ago
What has kept me from using this is the lack of media-queries. After investigating the gh repo it looks like there is a 2.0 branch with a responsive design already being built. I'm not sure what keeps them from releasing it but it appears
128.
by funthree 15y ago
This is especially true with toolkits/frameworks written in node.js. I wrote a server side version of jQuery in node.js, called nQuery, that changes the DOM paradigm by allowing you to access the DOM in real-time from the server with RPC v
129.
by funthree 15y ago
Link on MDN https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/demos/detail/plan-b-retr...
130.
What you can do without js these days(developer.mozilla.org)
2 points by funthree 15y ago|1 comments
131.
by funthree 15y ago
The article is actually written by a woman.
132.
Mongoose 2.0 is ready just in time for Node Knockout(mongoosejs.com)
9 points by funthree 15y ago|1 comments
133.
by funthree 15y ago
There is at least two cases that this doesnt explain. http://twitter.com/#!/jonathanscard/status/10034195955777536... http://twitter.com/#!/jonathanscard/status/10035604975584460... edit: now at least 5, see above
134.
by funthree 15y ago
Do you mind releasing the transaction data available? The card went from $100 to $0 within moments a number of times.
135.
by funthree 15y ago
I wonder what data you could get from reading the actual barcode? Would the CSC be in there? Edit: I just checked with an online barcode reader and this isnt the case. It resolves to 6061006913522430
136.
by funthree 15y ago
Aha, you are right. I will edit that. Any ideas?
137.
by funthree 15y ago
I think someone could have bought a SBux card with it. Looks like it has happened at least a few times now all within less than a minute or two of the balance being there. An employee or someone camping a store, perhaps... Is it possible
138.
by funthree 15y ago
You deserve upvotes (and I upvoted you) but someone just nabbed that entire $100 off the card within a few moments of it being there...
139.
by funthree 15y ago
Potentially abusive use shown in these tweets. http://twitter.com/#!/jonathanscard/status/10034749918897766... http://twitter.com/#!/jonathanscard/status/10034674284272844... http://twitter.com/#!/jonathanscard/status/10034195955777536
140.
Half of European Men Share King Tut's DNA(reuters.com)
1 points by funthree 15y ago|0 comments
141.
by funthree 15y ago
SEEKING WORK. Remote contractor accepting work in node.js. Contact info and more about me here http://blobaum.com/
142.
by funthree 15y ago
You're a troll.
143.
by funthree 15y ago
I never implied that I'd say anything.
144.
by funthree 15y ago
I could think of a number of ideas that would be severely unpopular. One idea: Start taxing people based on their net worth. It'd be for the greater good after all, right?
145.
by funthree 15y ago
Apple and Google are not foreign corporations You said it.
146.
by funthree 15y ago
If someone asks me a question, I give them an answer based on my understanding, and it turns out not to be so, I am not lying. At the time, I thought it was to be so. No, whether you like to hear it or not (which you clearly are a perso
147.
by funthree 15y ago
I just meant in the general sense. Google needs to pay their taxes too, but tech companies aren't the only ones evading taxes and getting away with it. Specifically this tax? Maybe not. But that wasn't the point.
148.
by funthree 15y ago
Maybe it's time they paid their fucking taxes like the rest of us.
149.
by funthree 15y ago
Apple forbid they'd bring those manufacturing jobs to the US and actually pay some Californians a decent wage and help their own country. http://harryjerry.com/tech/how-apple-products-are-made-in-fo... http://www.google.com/publicdata/ex
150.
by funthree 15y ago
I got a survey from these guys a few weeks ago and it had cc'd over 400 applicant emails, including mine, for all to see.

More ›