Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
fundad
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
I did something similar. I knew anything on my accounts was already in the palantir dataset used by DHS. I wanted to at least remove presence local on my phone, I didn't bring a computer abroad with me. I went through my history and de
62.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
I did read this wrong. > My spouse and I find that we are overwhelmingly the ones calling to organize playdates rather than vice versa. I read that as his spouse and he were organizing rather than the kids organizing with friends when th
63.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
I bet military service-members still socialize and get hammered.
64.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
It would be one thing if it worked. The OP admits that their kids don't initiate socializing but also claims they aren't poorly socialized. Blaming every parent but themselves when their parenting resulted in kids that don't
65.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
And partying is expensive
66.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
At least she can claim the success of getting the company sold, even if it was to a sibling company under X Corp.
67.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
Yes most of their revenue growth is expected to be as the everything app (or a video platform?). Musk has said over and over he doesn't care about advertising revenue, he mangled a quote from the Princess Bride to say "I don'
68.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
Yes
69.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
Sounds like there isn’t support for this agenda, and they’re breaking the law to force it on the country. They could moderate their position to something that would pass congress if they cared about the Republic.
70.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
It wasn't about revenue, it was about a massive propaganda and surveillance apparatus.
71.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
It looks like Telegram sold the US government a back door to users' messages.
72.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
It’s not hard to imagine since we’ve had almost 2 years of warnings that the GOP would do this. Of course those warnings were dismissed as hysterical by people who apparently wanted this economic crisis.
73.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
Right, they don’t know how much smaller the demand will be during an economic crisis. It’s safer to have empty shelves until they can more accurately forecast what’s left of demand.
74.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
Yeah that's what scares me. They are breaking laws AND lower living standards as if they won't have to run for reelection (or accept electoral loss) ever again.
75.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
Running government like a business... Theranos.
76.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
In hindsight, it looks like a pump-an-dump scam.
77.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
Agreed. There is no reasonable argument that the people in charge and those that voted for them actually want economic growth. This was not only the expected result, it was the intended result.
78.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
this director was appointed by the 45th president in 2017.
79.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
The benefits and pension must be worth it.
80.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
They probably also suspect “government efficiency” will target benefits like military base schools.
81.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
And even if you aren't disconnected, there are valid concerns about privacy and censorship.
82.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
Very good idea, dat is unencrypted until the system is rebooted. Valuable data is dangerous in the custody of a government you don’t trust.
83.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
They can substitute US products with those from plenty of nations plowing money into overcapacity and dumping their exports on the international market.
84.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
I don't expect an insurrectionist to do good for Americans. I also think government spending on overcapacity so we can export food is a waste of money and bad for the economy and the environment. How many millions of acres of soy bean
85.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
Instead of the US government spending away on overcapacity so Canadians can have cheap products, that money should go to public housing and healthcare subsidies. I think this is better for the US long term because agriculture is heavily sub
86.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
Yes, that's because they are a consumption tax intended to replace income tax. the talk of US manufacturing is not completely on-the-level.
87.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
The tariffs were definitely part of the campaign, described in detail in Project 2025 and will eventually replace higher brackets of the income tax. This consumption tax is tax policy, not trade policy. That was evident when there was not e
88.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
Yea. California’s government delivers a lot of services that protect ecosystems, a healthy economy and quality of life. All three of those examples are mutually beneficial. You can disagree with some services but that’s because the state do
89.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
My take is Biden sounds old. The sitting president sounds brain-damaged and unquestionably is in no condition to be making such impactful decisions. The wavering we see right now is because the different factions making the decisions are st
90.
▲
by
fundad
1y ago
I’m sure the richest corporations are rushing to retain these firms in an attempt to be on the winning side.
More ›