fuhrysteve

8 ms·

31.
by fuhrysteve 10y ago
But aptible doesn't have managed postgres. I still have to do all the work of setting up a database and managing backups, upgrades, etc. The only thing aptible brings to the table is single tenant hardware and encryption by default. I
32.
by fuhrysteve 10y ago
Congratulations to @asksol and the rest of the team for sealing the deal on 4.0! I've been waiting for a number of the features now in 4.0 for a long time now. I know you guys have been busting your asses for a long time and juggling w
33.
by fuhrysteve 10y ago
Does anyone have an abbreviated explanation of what the security vulnerabilities that were addressed here? I recall there was a very ominous post to look out for this release because of some nasty stuff they found.
34.
by fuhrysteve 10y ago
Why did it take so many months for the orbiter to get a photo? Compared to the rest of the achievements of this mission, it seems like this should have been relatively easy: 67P is all of like 2.5 miles wide and the orbit is at like 10 mile
35.
by fuhrysteve 10y ago
The traditional argument against hiring senior people in a young company is usually a mistake because cash is precious and senior people are usually too expensive to fully utilize since at a startup everyone ends up having to do bitch work
36.
by fuhrysteve 10y ago
Yes that's a good point! This seems to be simply a case of bad customer service rather than bad technology. I guess Another reason not to use DigitalOcean for projects requiring high availability I suppose.
37.
by fuhrysteve 10y ago
There are quite a few and of course it depends on your needs. Personally I like AWS and SoftLayer. They both have world class data centers and tons of different advanced ways to build and configure systems, numerous availability zones acros
38.
by fuhrysteve 10y ago
While this sounds frustrating, I wouldn't ever put anything that required high availability on DigitalOcean. DigitalOcean is great because they are cheap & simple to get stuff setup - not because they are robust and redundant.
39.
by fuhrysteve 11y ago
I'm a little horrified to suggest this seriously, but this could be a cool way to accomplish consistent field validation between server and client. I wrote this little library https://github.com/fuhrysteve/marshmal
40.
by fuhrysteve 11y ago
Any more?? I haven't been waiting a year - but I've been waiting eagerly if anyone has any!
41.
by fuhrysteve 11y ago
You typically use something like uwsgi or gunicorn to serve requests, and it's uwsgi & gunicorn that decide how many processes or threads to start. These typically sit behind a load balancer and / or a reverse proxy. In terms
42.
by fuhrysteve 11y ago
HIPAA is probably a stretch - but certainly sounds like someone's asking for an employment lawsuit.
43.
by fuhrysteve 11y ago
This is really cool, thanks for sharing it! I've been looking for tools that do things like this, however most things I've found end up being thrown together crap whose only goal is to serve as click-bait. My suggestion is to spen
44.
by fuhrysteve 11y ago
I wonder if this can get into Ubuntu 16.04 before feature freeze in a week or so..
45.
by fuhrysteve 11y ago
Totally agree. I don't want to invest my time using a service that I don't trust will be around in 5yrs. Would love to pay a few bucks a month for this service to help alleviate that fear. Making money is a good thing.
46.
by fuhrysteve 11y ago
They have a policy not to say anything or make any promises. That said, using history as a guide, it seems to take them about 2.5 months after a major release to add support.
47.
by fuhrysteve 11y ago
Being worked on as in it won't make it into 9.5? Or being worked on as in they are working out the kinks still
48.
by fuhrysteve 11y ago
This is just a prototype, but it is an attempt to solve a big problem I've had: describing a schema to a remote client system (browser / mobile / etc) in a portable way. Sure, I could just use a traditional form library to re
49.
Marshmallow-jsonschema – portable descriptions for marshmallow schemas [python](github.com)
3 points by fuhrysteve 11y ago|1 comments
50.
by fuhrysteve 11y ago
>> for large Java programs I wonder if the results would be different at all for a less strongly typed language, like python for example.
51.
by fuhrysteve 11y ago
I think it would have been more prudent to have implemented an iterative approach: Python 2.8: - boring easy to fix changes like division, print function, exception handling syntax, removal of iteritems() / etc Python 2.9 - library reo
52.
by fuhrysteve 11y ago
Already packaged for Debian nightly - check the installation instructions. I'm sure the releases will be too.
53.
by fuhrysteve 11y ago
Great news, long overdue. Neovim has been quite stable for many months now. Most people I know use the nightly builds, which was fine until they introduced some BC breaking stuff this week, which threw everyone off. Bunch of snobs on gitter
54.
by fuhrysteve 11y ago
This here is some of the beauty of linux - psql simply pipes the output to less - a tool that is made exclusively to handle these sorts of "look at a bunch of text on a terminal" problems. Most of the problems less exists to solve