Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
frumiousirc
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
61.
▲
by
frumiousirc
5mo ago
Great! One thing I do is have an RSS feed from a reddit search query so I can lurk random discussions that mention "zeromq". I'll then see if there is something I can do to encourage or contribute to whatever is happening.
62.
▲
by
frumiousirc
5mo ago
Unfortunately, those are largely words of a foregone era. The zeromq "community" today is tenuous. It has some really good people in it, the few that remain active, but the human-level processes and communication channels are il
63.
▲
by
frumiousirc
6mo ago
No. The first rotation is along an axis in the direction in which your fingers point. The second rotation is along an axis normal to your palm.
64.
▲
by
frumiousirc
6mo ago
> it's like a hand - it comes back to itself after 720° of rotation The analogy is a bit broken in a way that may add confusion. The hand comes back to it's starting configuration after two 360° rotations, each along a differe
65.
▲
by
frumiousirc
6mo ago
Assuming this is not a scam, my guess is that it emits sound above the Nyquist frequency of mic'ed devices with the hope that they lack a low-pass filter on the input of their ADC. Such devices would then suffer sample aliasing that w
66.
▲
by
frumiousirc
7mo ago
> There are better techniques for hyper-parameter optimisation, right? Yes, for example "swarm optimization". The difference with "autoresearch" (restricting just to the HPO angle) is that the LLM may (at least we hop
67.
▲
by
frumiousirc
7mo ago
> Copy paste is hijacked FWIW, in Kitty on Linux, SHIFT + mouse-select copies and SHIFT + middle-mouse-button pastes. This use of SHIFT and otherwise using standard Unix style copy/paste is common in a lot of TUIs (eg, weechat).
68.
▲
by
frumiousirc
7mo ago
A blanket follow-up "are you sure this is the best way to do it?" Frequently returns, "Oh, you are absolutely correct, let me redo this part better."
69.
▲
by
frumiousirc
7mo ago
The "AI mode" in Google search is pretty bad for programming. It is not Gemini. I don't have direct experience with ChatGPT but those that do that I've talked to place it behind Gemini and Claude models. Try free Claude
70.
▲
by
frumiousirc
7mo ago
This (reverse proxy) is essentially what "tailscale serve" does.
71.
▲
by
frumiousirc
7mo ago
Subjectively, but with tests using identical prompts, I find the quality of qwen3.5 122b below claude haiku by as much as claude haiku is below claude sonnet for software design planning tasks. I have yet to try a like-for-like test on cod
72.
▲
by
frumiousirc
7mo ago
What LLM are you using? What you describe should be no problem for gemini free or claude haiku and above. Other models, I dunno.
73.
▲
by
frumiousirc
7mo ago
The average native Japanese speaker knows more English than the average native English speaker knows Japanese.
74.
▲
by
frumiousirc
7mo ago
It depends. Google's AI that gloms on to search is not particularly good for programming. I don't use any OpenAI stuff but talking to those that do, their models are not good for programming compared to equivalent ones from Anthro
75.
▲
by
frumiousirc
7mo ago
Or, "The I in LLM stands for intelligence."
76.
▲
by
frumiousirc
7mo ago
> Note: my main complaint is the sheer number of markdown files over time, but I haven't gotten around to (or needed to) automate this yet, as sometimes these historic planning/debug files are useful for future changes. FWIW, w
77.
▲
by
frumiousirc
7mo ago
> these tools are actually just slot machines Slot machines that are biased toward producing jackpots. And "jackpots" are a metaphor for "training distribution".
78.
▲
by
frumiousirc
7mo ago
MY_API_KEY=$(pass my/api/key | head -1) python manage.py runserver
79.
▲
by
frumiousirc
8mo ago
Yours matches my own experience and work habits. My mental model is that LLMs are obedient but lazy. The laziness shows in the output matching the letter of the prompt but with as high "code entropy" as possible. What I mean by &
80.
▲
by
frumiousirc
8mo ago
Sounds good. Thanks for describing it. Since you still have C++ involved and if you are still looking for composable dataflow ideas, take a look at TBB's "flow_graph" module. It's graph execution is all in-process whil
81.
▲
by
frumiousirc
8mo ago
Data flow graphs could arguably be called structured concurrency (granted, of nodes that resemble actors). FWIW, this has become a perfectly cromulent pattern over the decades. It allows highly concurrent computation limited only by the siz
82.
▲
by
frumiousirc
8mo ago
I see the "hunter2" exploit is ready to be upgraded for the LLM era.
83.
▲
by
frumiousirc
9mo ago
Eject mass in the forward direction of its current tangent of motion. Slow down to go down.
84.
▲
by
frumiousirc
9mo ago
> No matter how advanced the model gets, you'll get better results if you can clarify your thoughts well in written language. This definitely agrees with my experience. But a corollary is that written human language is very cumbers
85.
▲
by
frumiousirc
9mo ago
Pedantically, this game is at least 2D due to including time. It presents more dimensions if we consider the different LED colors. I'm now trying to contemplate what a truly 1D pong game would be. We can't escape time so we woul
86.
▲
by
frumiousirc
9mo ago
L1 (abs linear difference) is useful as minimizing on it gives an approximation of minimizing on L0 (count, aka maximizing sparsity). The reason for the substitution is that L1 has a gradient and so minimization can be fast with convention
87.
▲
by
frumiousirc
9mo ago
The article is about comments. But, more generally, I think the issue here is about naming things. Names capture ideas. Only if we name something can we (or at least I) reason about it. The more clear and descriptive a name for something
88.
▲
by
frumiousirc
9mo ago
Yes, I got lost in the numbers and made a blunder by misinterpreting what we mean by frequency resolution expressed in "BPM" instead of Hz. It is correct to say "0.0046237213 Hz which is 0.27742328 BPM". My mistake was
89.
▲
by
frumiousirc
9mo ago
I was also wondering about the inherent resolution for the BPM precision claims. Besides the sample period, the total number of samples matter for frequency resolution (aka BPM precision). 44100 Hz sampling frequency (22.675737 us period) f
90.
▲
by
frumiousirc
9mo ago
Well, plants and eyes long predate apes. Water is most transparent in the middle of the "visible" spectrum (green). It absorbs red and scatters blue. The atmosphere has a lot of water as does, of course, the ocean which was the
More ›