frsyuki

9 ms·

31.
by frsyuki 15y ago
Technically, there are 2 important differences: - Statically typed or dynamically typed - Type mapping between language's type system and serializer's type system (Note: these serializers are cross-language) The most understandable differ
32.
The Big Data Ecosystem at LinkedIn(slideshare.net)
2 points by frsyuki 15y ago|0 comments
33.
TokuDB - a highly scalable, zero maintenance downtime MySQL(tokutek.com)
1 points by frsyuki 15y ago|0 comments
34.
Quma: 3D Motion-Capture Figure For 3D CG Production (Video)(techcrunch.com)
2 points by frsyuki 15y ago|0 comments
35.
Java servlet containers, startup time(blog.hgomez.net)
2 points by frsyuki 15y ago|0 comments
36.
The WebSocket protocol "Last Call"(datatracker.ietf.org)
58 points by frsyuki 15y ago|12 comments
37.
Microsoft Research Releases Another Hadoop Alternative for Azure(readwriteweb.com)
2 points by frsyuki 15y ago|0 comments
38.
by frsyuki 15y ago
The article doesn't describe but one of the biggest difference is scalability. MongoDB supports horizontal scaling as a built-in feature. It's known that MySQL can be scaled out by sharding but you lose ACID with it. Of course scalability i
39.
by frsyuki 15y ago
This slide was published by @acmurthy at Hortonworks, which is a new company formed by core Hadoop committers from the Yahoo! Hadoop software engineering team. http://www.hortonworks.com/
40.
NextGen Apache Hadoop MapReduce (slideshare.net)
3 points by frsyuki 15y ago|2 comments
41.
by frsyuki 15y ago
RITE is exactly what I want to need. The problem is that distributed systems (like message queues or notification services) are required to be fast/scalable but very hard to program/debug/test. One solution is embedding plugin mechanism in
42.
by frsyuki 15y ago
I'll use postfix for that case. For yet another point of view, how about using external SMTP server directly? You are sending messages as follows: app -> local MTA -> /var/spool/mail <- users read mails but this is easier
43.
by frsyuki 15y ago
Interesting. OMeta can create a new parser that inherits from an existing parser. It's unique. But we have to not just parse but also evaluate. OMeta's external DSL is excellent for parsing but seems difficult to use for evaluating. There a
44.
by frsyuki 16y ago
Message Pack vs similar utilities: http://gist.github.com/290425
45.
by frsyuki 16y ago
It basically uses TCP. Raw unreliable UDP is also supported on Ruby and Java. TCP or UDP will be enough choices for most of applications. Practically, MessagePack-RPC mainly focuses on cross-language communication, like Ruby frontend <-
46.
by frsyuki 16y ago
It's true that network latency is dominator rather than serialization. But low CPU/memory usage is still important for CPU/memory-bound applications. Especially, zero-copy feature is effective to raise maximum throughput. As for RPC perform
47.
New website of MessagePack Project introduces next-generation RPC.(msgpack.org)
22 points by frsyuki 16y ago|8 comments
48.
Kumofs - Extreamly fast and scalable key-value store with Tokyo Cabinet backend(kumofs.sourceforge.net)
8 points by frsyuki 16y ago|0 comments