frankgrecojr

6 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by frankgrecojr 3y ago

   This will be awesome when it's possible! I often wish GitHub Copilot knew more about my repo than it does.
2. 32.▲
   by frankgrecojr 3y ago

   I do it all of the time (with GitHub copilot). It's getting much better. If I retro my interactions with it, I think I'll usually give it a "once over" to see if what it's doing makes sense. Sometimes I'll add
3. 33.▲
   by frankgrecojr 3y ago

   > And the comment for filterUsersTable is incredibly long, tedious, and unhelpful. This is good feedback. I think having an ability to adjust verbosity is valuable. A comment version should maybe be more concise than the actual explanati
4. 34.▲
   by frankgrecojr 3y ago

   > I haven't seen or heard of anyone that seriously uses ChatGPT to generate code and uses it in prod I would agree with this in general. The main goal here is to optimize the "editor experience". When I personally code, I&
5. 35.▲
   by frankgrecojr 3y ago

   Thanks! I took a look at your repo and love the concise gif!
6. 36.▲
   by frankgrecojr 3y ago

   Yea I believe we did.
7. 37.▲
   by frankgrecojr 3y ago

   Thanks!
8. 38.▲
   by frankgrecojr 3y ago

   We have never been a blockchain company. However, I do believe there is one with a similar name.
9. 39.▲
   by frankgrecojr 3y ago

   Thanks for the kind words! A lot of thought went into the user experience. You can expect the same level of thought with all of our future AI features.
10. 40.▲
    by frankgrecojr 3y ago

    Thanks for your comment! We're always open to product improvement around our Workflows product. I agree there's more features we need to add to service a robust set of web hook use cases. With that being said, there may be ways to
11. 41.▲
    Show HN: Superblocks AI – AI coding assistant for internal apps(superblocks.com)

    114 points by frankgrecojr 3y ago|62 comments
12. 42.▲
    by frankgrecojr 3y ago

    As an engineer and former cyclist, this is amazing to see!!
13. 43.▲
    The Finalizer Pattern for Distributed Systems(frankgrecojr.medium.com)

    2 points by frankgrecojr 3y ago|0 comments
14. 44.▲
    VC Finds Founders for Its Ideas(dot.la)

    1 points by frankgrecojr 4y ago|1 comments
15. 45.▲
    by frankgrecojr 4y ago

    I will be the first to tell you that I don't think I'm qualified yet to have an opinion. However, I think this is a horrible idea. > Struck and his colleagues–CTO and co-founder of Resy Michael Montero and Tom Ryan, CEO of stre
16. 46.▲
    by frankgrecojr 4y ago

    Thanks for this! I think I’ll add this to the blog
17. 47.▲
    by frankgrecojr 4y ago

    What companies do we think do this well!?
18. 48.▲
    by frankgrecojr 4y ago

    If I were running a company, there would be no meetings before noon.
19. 49.▲
    by frankgrecojr 4y ago

    This is brilliant! I did this at my last gig with great success!
20. 50.▲
    by frankgrecojr 4y ago

    I love this soapbox! I'm trying to figure out why a well-intentioned company starts this way, and then quickly digresses. I think part of the issue is the feedback loop doesn't exist. If your end to end cycle is done, the sales te
21. 51.▲
    by frankgrecojr 4y ago

    > Also your scrum master should be sheltering you from some of the distractions you are describing. Yes. However, they're usually spread so thin and "scrum master" may too many teams to fully be invested in a single one.
22. 52.▲
    by frankgrecojr 4y ago

    The ability to create a recurring Focus Time event has been game changing!
23. 53.▲
    by frankgrecojr 4y ago

    Also, I think if we normalized what we both mean by "is completely bought in" we'd be closer to agreeing ;) Perhaps what I meant by this is an understanding that team x is following methodology y and can expect i, j, k becaus
24. 54.▲
    by frankgrecojr 4y ago

    > teams pick and choose what works for them. Is this practical though. An engineering team has a product team, a sales team that needs a feature. If those 3 teams don't align on the fact that the dev team is practicing "agile&q
25. 55.▲
    by frankgrecojr 4y ago

    3) People add so many people to the meetings that it's never ever possible to find the same free block and so a certain percentage of people get scheduled over.
26. 56.▲
    by frankgrecojr 4y ago

    Agreed. If you're an actual stakeholder whose input is required, the organizer will reschedule to ensure you're able to make it.
27. 57.▲
    by frankgrecojr 4y ago

    From my experience, it only works if the entire company is completely bought in to the entire system. Even going so far as the SAFe framework. Companies think they can pick/choose which pieces they implement and this is a recipe for fa
28. 58.▲
    by frankgrecojr 4y ago

    I can personally relate to: - 60 minute meetings fighting over whether tickets were 3 or 5 story points - absolute inflexibility over my noon standup. I could be in the deepest of zones and people would literally slack repeatedly until you
29. 59.▲
    by frankgrecojr 4y ago

    I like your last point. It makes me think of the book, Radical Candor!
30. 60.▲
    by frankgrecojr 4y ago

    In my experience, it's very common for people to not have any regard for existing meetings and schedule right over them.