Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
frabbit
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
20 ms
·
61.
▲
by
frabbit
3y ago
I love that series. There is also Portrait Artist of the Year with the same presenters.
62.
▲
by
frabbit
3y ago
artist who makes hyper-realistic pencil drawings of people where each picture takes 2 to 3 months to make and looks literally like a photo-copy. To you that is art. To me it is kitsch. I don`t care if it took 3 months to make somethi
63.
▲
by
frabbit
3y ago
Agreed. My attempt at a quibble was foolish.
64.
▲
by
frabbit
3y ago
Signal Corp is doing just fine. Those donations would have a much bigger effect for the people developing Matrix and associated applications.
65.
▲
by
frabbit
3y ago
Another reason why those arguing against centralized messaging systems as opposed to de-centralized, federated were correct. Who wants Signal and their US-centric board to decide they can do anything. If Signal were really sticking it to t
66.
▲
by
frabbit
3y ago
No. Signal is not the solution. The position that they are taking publicly in this dispute with the UK vassal state is correct on the face of it. But they now have some people on their board that raise red flags for anyone interested in p
67.
▲
by
frabbit
3y ago
In some ways the faithful seeking the grail of "encryption" which will protect them from the Evil mirrors the belief of earlier generations that a Constitution is enough on its own. Nothing is meaningful without the physical and s
68.
▲
by
frabbit
3y ago
With the recent board changes in Signal (Katherine Maher and other people highly associated with the government of the USA) it is reasonable to assume that it compromised in some way. The UK probably recognizes this and wants to make it a
69.
▲
by
frabbit
3y ago
Corporations are legally recognized to have personhood in the USA. They are also legal entities. Anyway is a "person" not also a legal entity in some way? In short, I understand what you are saying but I don't think it is pr
70.
▲
by
frabbit
3y ago
There is no provable claim by GCHQ for any of this. They are professionally liars and deceivers. The first public, peer-reviewed publishers are the ones that get the credit. GCHQ claims are just unproven British government propaganda fro
71.
▲
by
frabbit
3y ago
Don't impute motives to strangers on the internet. I have no frustration. I am requesting a statement from someone that has been very outspoken on many issues around secure, safe, private communication in the past and is in a better p
72.
▲
by
frabbit
3y ago
Let`s be truly fair: the USA "federal government" is historically and presently one of the biggest committers of war crimes in the world. If you work for it you work for evil. I am sure it keeps the kids in Montessori and enab
73.
▲
by
frabbit
3y ago
Moxie the anarchist owes the rest of us a public statement about what he thinks Signal is now that the board has US State Department ghouls on it.
74.
▲
by
frabbit
3y ago
Katherine Maher? The US State Department definitely-not-a-spook one? The one that was at Wikipedia and "spent time in Syria and Lybia"? Sounds wonderful for a messaging system that is going to be definitely trusted not to be man
75.
▲
by
frabbit
5y ago
It strikes me that the effort that goes into trying to outright suppress disinformation is also a waste of time. It leaks through anyway and the consequences of being seen to suppress it leads to distrust. All that you can hope is that the
76.
▲
by
frabbit
5y ago
Also, it could usefully be used to identify people for treatment as was done in the old USSR: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2800147/
77.
▲
by
frabbit
5y ago
A formal ban on editors being members/volunteers/associated-with state-related propaganda outfits like the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) would be good. It wouldn't stop anything underhanded, but at least they would n
78.
▲
by
frabbit
5y ago
> What would be an example of an "appropriate" use of this technology? Well, investigative officers concerned for the well-being of the individual and the potential for self harm or danger to others could attempt to help them w
79.
▲
by
frabbit
5y ago
Well Ireland was made to vote twice on ratifying the Lisbon Treaty. The people's vote got it wrong the first time with a "no", but after suitable re-education they got it right the next go around. Luckily there was no need f
80.
▲
by
frabbit
5y ago
I don't care if the US "invaded anyone for territorial expansion" or did it for shits'n'giggles. It has done all the above and more which weakens any chance that calls for democracy, international order, peace, sta
81.
▲
by
frabbit
5y ago
Actually, having googled and looked around I am highly conflicted on this. There is no coverage either pro/con in The Times, The New York Times ( https://www.nytimes.com/topic/subject/freedom-of-speech-and-...
82.
▲
by
frabbit
5y ago
I disagree. The advice to disable SELinux, like your assertion that it's too complicated for ordinary users, belongs to an older time. It's time to lay that myth to bed. Sure, if you're messing around with k8s and doing fun
83.
▲
by
frabbit
5y ago
> it's clear that for most lay folks, SELinux is software that doesn't work. I have always used selinux enabled systems. For the first few years it was a bit confusing and frustrating at times, but for the last (decade?) I hav
84.
▲
by
frabbit
5y ago
At this stage I am going to assume that it is a lie. I cannot find any reputable mainstream media references to it.
85.
▲
by
frabbit
5y ago
We just had RT and Sputnik taken off the air by regulators in the EU. And why would it be alright if a business did it?
86.
▲
by
frabbit
5y ago
Are there any Czech speakers that can help out? I have been trying to verify that "Prague Morning" story and cannot find references to it in their list of main newspapers in wikipedia.
87.
▲
by
frabbit
5y ago
Important note on this: "Fortunately, the default security hardenings in most container environments are enough to prevent container escape. Containers running with AppArmor or SELinux are protected. " So, all that hard work on SE
88.
▲
by
frabbit
5y ago
Two things on that: 1) that was somewhat my point: so-called liberal democracies are increasingly censoring and distributing information. Exactly the Orwellian-dystopia many of us fear. 2) If we are talking about the Czech and Slovak exam
89.
▲
by
frabbit
5y ago
And this is why the GNU project, Fedora and others explicitly ask contributors for CLAs if I understand it correctly: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-assign.en.html https://softwareengineering.stackexchang
90.
▲
by
frabbit
5y ago
This coupled with the jail sentences for "disinformation" are predictable in autocracies like Russia. They desire to shutdown information and steer their subject populations into the path of correct thinking. Very disturbing to s
More ›