foverzar

37 ms·

361.
by foverzar 4y ago
> When there were incidents like the Cuban missile crisis it was because the ground rules weren't clear to all the players. The Soviets didn't think the US would react the way it did Missiles in Cuba were a USSRs response to US
362.
by foverzar 4y ago
Sure, I guess sanctions were there just for the kicks without any real substantial effect. Just so that poor non-commies don't feel bad about themselves, since, you know, evil commies had already supposedly restricted all the trade. &#
363.
by foverzar 4y ago
> Blame boomers. Oh come on. Boomers are grand- or even sometimes grand-grand-parents at this point, with one foot in a grave at best. Zoomers are already building their careers and some even have babies. Stop kicking grandpa, at this p
364.
by foverzar 4y ago
Well that's just escapism.
365.
by foverzar 4y ago
Yeah, pushing someone of a cliff is definitely not the same as smashing their head with a rock.
366.
by foverzar 4y ago
> not needing to worry about each `RUN` step creating a layer which may bloat the image Could someone please explain to me, why exactly do people avoid layers and treat them as "bloat"? I always thought that layers are nice to
367.
by foverzar 4y ago
> I read section about US involvement, and nothing there says they organized coup in 1973, in opposite, this link says that many sources confirm US were not involved into the coup Out of curiosity, skimmed the article a bit and look: &gt
368.
by foverzar 4y ago
Yeah, bad Afghan people didn't want to fight for a pro-American regime that supported brutal warlords and child prostitution (literally the first populist thing Taliban did was to crack down on bacha bazi - imagine being worse than Tal
369.
by foverzar 4y ago
Then maybe US obviously shouldn't aggressively burn down every other country, if it can't take responsibility? And let's be honest, the US can't build an autonomous functional democracy in another culture, period. It&#x2
370.
by foverzar 4y ago
> which is why they are recovering it over shallow water. They shot the payload with a missile over the sea. What's there to recover?
371.
by foverzar 4y ago
> We don't care how much the target costs. Except with military you actually have to, which is perfectly demonstrated right now in Ukraine. > We stand to learn a lot from capturing the surveillance platform. This alone is pricele
372.
by foverzar 4y ago
Your talk of China in relation to North Korea betrays your lack of historic and political knowledge. While China is it's only ally now, it wasn't always the case. North Korea would relatively peacefully evolve from dictatorship if
373.
by foverzar 4y ago
Why would one spend resources on providing someone with benefits of citizenship, when a neocolonial practice of establishing a puppet government is enough for one's goals?
374.
by foverzar 4y ago
> US didn't do ground operation in Libya What an awesome excuse.
375.
by foverzar 4y ago
You say that there are no "good" and "bad" guys, but then go on stating that there are "bad" guys. Careful, almost committed a thoughtcrime here. You people are impossible.
376.
by foverzar 4y ago
Are you being serious right now? The sorry looks of North Korea has nothing to do with China's support and everything to do with the fact that America has been beating and sanctioning the shit out of it since the day of it's incep
377.
by foverzar 4y ago
> We should make military decisions based on how much the target costs Yes?.. > You don't understand why that's ridiculous? No?.. Don't you understand how the cost of action is the base of military economy? This is hard
378.
by foverzar 4y ago
Didn't they shoot it over the ocean? What's there to retrieve?
379.
by foverzar 4y ago
JavaScript isn't bad. But if only it were used with native toolkits, instead of running a whole browser instance.
380.
by foverzar 4y ago
> The earth is full so we should tolerate governments like the CCP/CPC? Careful with that kind of rhetorics. The world may start asking the same question regarding the 15% of world's population who act like they are the enlight
381.
by foverzar 4y ago
> Her political ideas are still nuts though. Ugh, there are no "political ideas" here. Why does western culture always insist on viewing everything through political or ideological lens? You realise that you are literally the
382.
by foverzar 4y ago
> You'll be impressed once the successor of chatGPT takes your job. Which part of it? ;) Leading a team of software engineers? Identifying and negotiating vague parts of business requirements? Designing technical specs? Or maybe the
383.
by foverzar 4y ago
Oh c'mon, is this what really impresses you? > It's not just spitting out generic things, there is genuine understanding here and genuine creativity. Srsly? I really can't wrap my head around where specifically did you fin
384.
by foverzar 4y ago
Is it legal to lower wages for current employees? In my country it isn't.
385.
by foverzar 4y ago
A bit off-topic, but how do people actually feel about being diversity hires? Doesn't that feel... Demeaning? I've once had a talk with a CEO (a very technical one) of an ML/CV company, who told me a story of how some America
386.
by foverzar 4y ago
> And then the US government protected Saudi Arabia from any lawsuits in the US I've just randomly clicked this link and... How in the world did you even manage to phrase it like that? Why do people lie in their summaries that often
387.
by foverzar 4y ago
It is safe to assume that they just never even heard of the half of those US military actions. Ironically, things like "Nothing happened in Tiananmen Square on 4 June 1989" (nothing happened in Yugoslavia, nothing happened in Yeme
388.
by foverzar 4y ago
> In the same time, the US has invaded three times Like at least four, and if we use the same counting logic you did for Russia, it would be at least 20. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NATO_operations https:
389.
by foverzar 4y ago
> Chechnya twice (1994 and 1999) In 1994 Chechnya was legally a part of Russia. By that principle, are you considering that Ukraine had invaded Donetsk? Not trolling, just wondering if it is a point of principle or doublethink. In 1999 C
390.
by foverzar 4y ago
> in Georgia Russian peacekeeping corps WAS attacked in Georgia. The EU fact-finding mission, had blamed Saakashvili: https://www.spiegel.de/international/world/new-report-on-rus... https://www.spieg

More ›