Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
foul
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
121.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
> Would you accept that kind of reasoning for software running on your pacemaker, or on your insuline pump? God helps me I wouldn't implant anything so fundamental in my body with hard dependencies on encrypted communication to a re
122.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
If you don't care about issues or wikis, it's now time to create a habit for using the command line (or the dillo plugin which automates this process): dir=$(mktemp -d) git clone --no-checkout --depth 1 https://git
123.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
>My projects all depend on an API for automation. So by buying into this doctrine, and rejecting even content negotiation, I am at least doubling my endpoints. If you can query that client-side, you don't need an hypermedia client,
124.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
If you're not wishing to read its code, it's a good strategy not to use it.
125.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
Sick the story, sick the designer
126.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
Complexity comes gradually. You will not find reasonable to reparse HTML spit out from Dreamweaver or Word to fit js/cgi parts in there but withstanding 5 years of work you may find perfectly sane to compile JSX. Plus most of the peopl
127.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
You guys trying to revive the FrontPage/Dreamweaver era?
128.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
Woodgas vehicles were enormously inefficient. Said that, rest of the story is sick AF, he made a pyrolithic device all by himself.
129.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
No, block at firewall-level. I never implied you should have to "study", "scan" the attacker's request: drop it. You don't owe net-neutrality to a botnet instance. That's just for when you should need to b
130.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
>You're spending time trying to annoy attackers that you should probably just ignore. s/ignore/block at firewall-level/ To me this article is of relevance nonetheless because It inspires me for messing with AI traine
131.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
> >Gnome after version 1, definitely after version 2 is a symptom of the >"software is never done" fallacy. After building a solid, performant and >working desktop environment, instead of leaving it alone and
132.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
I hope he's doing well, wherever he is. An active community around Dillo sparkles my wanting of hacking on it, Dpi (especially filters) is the best plugin system a browser could have imho.
133.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
Very nice to hear! Anybody knows what happened to Jorge A. Cid?
134.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
A lot more lighterweight, and nowadays it's good to have less (it has less CSS compatibility, less html compatibility and no JS).
135.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
PHP stops you from being clever with it by making you angry at times. It's very predictable too, on its hardly avoidable, disgusting pitfalls. But things may still change for the worse with that process of Scala-ification they are do
136.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
I've seen a bit of SaaS and legacy websites-with-invoice-system doing that, with e.g. wkhtmltopdf. It isn't a lightweight solution, but it's a good hammer for a strange nail, a lot of off-the-shelf report systems suck.
137.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
Way way better than Xorg, but sooner or later 3D has to come to unix-world.
138.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
>the whole cheap/small web thing has me thinking of those people who buy used clothes but think nothing of paying $15 for a coffee at hipsterCafe. something virtue signally about it. Very often hipsterCafe commoditizes a demand for
139.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
I can't trust anyone penning their posts grey on black.
140.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
You're thinking too much in the realm of user-friendly. Of course on openBSD you would enclose work programs in a xephyr and an ad hoc rdomain, or connect a xephyr to a vmm's Xenocara with its own tap device. Xephyrs don't
141.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
>Not being content with alienating only the general purpose JSON API enthusiasts, let me now proceed to also alienate my erstwhile hypermedia enthusiast allies Nah I think he's right and it's coherent to avoid HTTP subtleties i
142.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
By "strangling" its leadership and "strangling" Chromium. That can only be done by doing substantial development without Mozilla's consent and filling niches where Google have no profit. Both are impossible feats t
143.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
Another paragraph later he writes something that sounds like "we have to bring on regulatory capture when it's right to, not when it makes us feel good and doesn't damage our profits".
144.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
Naivety is an aspect of economics when the globalization/dropshipping dynamics comes at play. For a lot of Western brands it's cash in, cash out, just some worries about sales-related personnel and maybe (not in this domain) some
145.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
I love posts like this, a glimpse on 3-4 worlds never (by me) explored.
146.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
Probably it produces a bear spray effect pairing chili/chipotle with blinding quantities of pepper (black pepper, not the chili ones)
147.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
You're trying to derail that drug-fueled rant to Godwin, while in that list there are much more modern demons of our age: Nick Land, Neven "you don't like conservative arguments but they are right!!1" Sesardic, John Galt
148.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
The reason I see why he would post this is envy. Envy for Peter Thiel.
149.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
I was thinking under the cross-platform desktop+mobile league sorry! Obviously when you develop with OS-specific and with a form factor even an SDK so neglected as any linux GUI will be a lot more simpler, and if you face complexity there,
150.
▲
by
foul
3y ago
That just explains why do we know about that complexity. Alternatives aren't less complex (and when you need some niche features W3 supports like printers and BT you're in deps hell -- at least you're operating without node.
More ›