forcefsck

7 ms·

31.
by forcefsck 15y ago
I wish I could up-vote you a thousand times. Stallman is much more respectful and polite to a person who was neither of them to many. So many see Steve Jobs as just a success story, fitting so well to the "american dream". They miss the fac
32.
by forcefsck 15y ago
Simple and to the point. Couldn't agree more.
33.
by forcefsck 15y ago
"Democratic" governments with good deals for their oil companies and bad deals with their people.
34.
by forcefsck 15y ago
Anonymity as "Anonymous Coward", someone on the internets with zero credibility said you were a bad student. Thanks to google super search powers, I know who you are, I'd certainly never hire you. Anonimity as "Certain Nickname on g+". Nobo
35.
by forcefsck 15y ago
You made a decision that it hasn't worked (yet). It doesn't necessarily mean that it was a/the wrong decision, only one without the expected outcome. You are only 20, really, you are still just a kid, it's kind of offensive for older guys l
36.
by forcefsck 15y ago
> I think it's pretty telling that tablet computers have existed for ... what, 15 years? And that tablet computing didn't take off with consumers until iPad. What is pretty telling is that although the first versions of apple's products
37.
by forcefsck 15y ago
> but the computers I have used, the smartphone I own, the tablet I will eventually get, the world I will live in 20 years from now, probably would not exist if it wasn't for Steve Jobs. This is such an overstatement. What makes you so
38.
Canada's first LTE network(cellcomwireless.com)
2 points by forcefsck 15y ago|0 comments
39.
by forcefsck 15y ago
yes?
40.
by forcefsck 15y ago
> No, this was a feature. It had been safe in the days of static libraries, it became a problem when the LD_something family of variables was introduced. So? Still a bad design in the telnetd's part. If it wasn't LD_ variables it would
41.
by forcefsck 15y ago
So, again, the exploit was that a telnet session was exporting environment variables. LD_PRELOAD_PATH was just a way to take advantage of the telnetd exploit, which might not be the only way. I think that naming it "The LD_PRELOAD_PATH expl
42.
by forcefsck 15y ago
The thing is that someone has to execute some code to change it, and if so then malicious code has already been run. By then it is irrelevant if LD_PRELOAD_PATH will be used or not. If I trick you into running 'rm -fR *', does that count as
43.
by forcefsck 15y ago
Except that LD_LIBRARY_PATH is not a type of exploit and shouldn't be mentioned as such.
44.
by forcefsck 15y ago
This is my QotD today.