Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
foolswisdom
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
91.
▲
by
foolswisdom
1y ago
The problem is that the business model is that when you outsource compliance (in this case that might be catching cheaters), the important thing is to be able to say that everyone did their best, and you don't necessarily need to do
92.
▲
by
foolswisdom
1y ago
Because you don't want the other side (political party) to do the same thing. The US congress has relatively recent rules designed to actually prevent this from happening, and rather keep everything in reconciliation bills. Which obvio
93.
▲
by
foolswisdom
1y ago
It's good that there are checks, but the core point remains that nimbleness is required for effectiveness. I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm observing that the courts are slow, and that the same logic (slow is good) can i
94.
▲
by
foolswisdom
1y ago
True, but at the same time, "Justice delayed is justice denied"[1]. An excessively slow justice system means that you need substantially more resources (money, and time living under the uncertainty of the outcome) to deal with it,
95.
▲
by
foolswisdom
1y ago
You're confusing two different things. 1 the court determined that apple subverted the original injunction, and ordered that it comply immediately (specifically calling out all the ways apple was getting around the injunction previousl
96.
▲
by
foolswisdom
1y ago
It's part of the original selling points of python, so it's not surprising that we've never stopped doing it.
97.
▲
LiveBench: A Challenging, Contamination-Free LLM Benchmark
(livebench.ai)
3 points
by
foolswisdom
1y ago
|
0 comments
98.
▲
by
foolswisdom
1y ago
Note that the vulnerability applies to the Java library (or systems that use it, like Spark),as mentioned in the original source.
99.
▲
by
foolswisdom
1y ago
> The article never says how much they detected. I can only assume it’s because it’s a nothing amount. If it was significant they would have been saying how much. It’s hard to take the article seriously as a result. Did we read the same
100.
▲
by
foolswisdom
1y ago
I'm not sure I follow. Traditional computing does allow us to make this distinction, and allows us to control the scenarios when we don't want this distinction, and when we have software that doesn't implement such rules appr
101.
▲
by
foolswisdom
2y ago
I think the research by anthropic released recently showed that language is handled independently of the "concepts" they convey, so first you get the concepts, then you get the translation to language.
102.
▲
by
foolswisdom
2y ago
> Fed started raising rates in Apr 2022, at which point leaders started freaking out because they know what higher rates mean, and by Jun 2022 the Fed was raising them in 0.75% increments, which was unheard of in modern economics. You&#x
103.
▲
by
foolswisdom
2y ago
I'm sure this will be written up somewhere as an example of Google doing a good job at customer relations, despite the disaster it is for said customers.
104.
▲
by
foolswisdom
2y ago
The sounds like exactly the point OP is making. The way LLMs are spoken about implies much more than actually demonstrated.
105.
▲
by
foolswisdom
2y ago
That's nominal profit margins. It doesn't take into account the way that different parts of these conglomerates take money from one pocket and put it in the other (e.g. insurance and Healthcare providers), which means it doesn
106.
▲
by
foolswisdom
2y ago
A la https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Bullshit .
107.
▲
by
foolswisdom
2y ago
> So what am I to do when I see something from this same source that I don't know about? Well there's always < https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gell-Mann_amnesia_effect >. Sounds like your not as vulner
108.
▲
by
foolswisdom
2y ago
The fact that they shut down Google domains (and cloud domains now uses squarespace, who bought Google domains) shows that you can't necessarily trust they won't shut down critical GCP services either.
109.
▲
by
foolswisdom
2y ago
It matters to the companies whose business model is to make money because they have moat.
110.
▲
by
foolswisdom
2y ago
To frame it differently, if you want people and businesses to do whatever they want, you need to make sure that the businesses they depend don't become platforms without meaningful competition. But of course the dream of every company
111.
▲
by
foolswisdom
2y ago
That's true until you become big enough that common carrier regulations apply to you. Besides, how does the first amendment enshrine that?
112.
▲
by
foolswisdom
2y ago
> You write that you can only think of games, some productivity software and legacy enterprise software as the reason for why your OS would matter. That sounds like you're a Linux user? Or a windows user. Like myself as well.
113.
▲
by
foolswisdom
2y ago
It doesn't seem like this challenges anything but the market for gaming devices (not general purpose PCs). Is that correct? And if so, is the title ("terrified") a little overblown?
114.
▲
by
foolswisdom
2y ago
The relationship between those two things is more like the relationship between burgers and fries, two things that some people may think belong together, but having a claim on one surely has connection to having a claim on the other.
115.
▲
by
foolswisdom
2y ago
There are two different trials in the USA, one focused on search as a product (which Google lost, and plans to appeal after remedies are determined), and another antitrust trial about advertising (of which the trial happened, but no ruling
116.
▲
by
foolswisdom
2y ago
That's because license requirements are on _other_ users (who are being licensed to use it) to follow, not the owner (who _owns_ it and doesn't need to follow the license terms the owner requires of others). Nevertheless, not ever
117.
▲
by
foolswisdom
2y ago
It doesn't seem like there was an additional recent event here, but the article summarizes the activity so far. The ipde.com blog has many posts covering the events as they happened: https://ipde.com/blog/tag/
118.
▲
by
foolswisdom
2y ago
I would think student loan forgiveness is bad in the way bailing out banks is bad. It solves a specific problem now, but if you don't figure out a way to change the way things work it will simply happen again. It can make sense if it b
119.
▲
by
foolswisdom
2y ago
For anyone who (like me) was confused at what this is, it's a Unix like OS for embedded systems. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/QNX
120.
▲
by
foolswisdom
2y ago
It's a parameter passed to the tcl_m function it's enclosed in.
More ›