fogus

61 ms·

661.
by fogus 15y ago
Always remember, no matter how hard you work it's important to take some Cheeto time occasionally.
662.
Back To Basics: Mark and Sweep Garbage Collection(blogs.msdn.com)
1 points by fogus 15y ago|0 comments
663.
JavaScript Is Not A Language(gilesbowkett.blogspot.com)
8 points by fogus 15y ago|1 comments
664.
by fogus 15y ago
Like this? http://blog.fogus.me/2009/05/29/pet-projects/
665.
John Resig: JavaScript as a First Language(ejohn.org)
306 points by fogus 15y ago|216 comments
666.
The Road to Clojure Survey(blog.fogus.me)
46 points by fogus 15y ago|1 comments
667.
The Road to Lisp Survey(wiki.alu.org)
7 points by fogus 15y ago|1 comments
668.
Rob Pike on Go interfaces(groups.google.com)
104 points by fogus 15y ago|37 comments
669.
What Is a Program?(stuartsierra.com)
6 points by fogus 15y ago|0 comments
670.
Metaclasses in Python(stackoverflow.com)
158 points by fogus 15y ago|30 comments
671.
WebOS is dead on arrival(m.zdnet.com)
1 points by fogus 15y ago|0 comments
672.
Aim for Semantic Elegance, Not Syntactic(symbo1ics.com)
4 points by fogus 15y ago|0 comments
673.
Lisp: Tears of Joy(linuxforu.com)
4 points by fogus 15y ago|0 comments
674.
by fogus 15y ago
I have a couple of (take ...) interviews in the pipeline that focus on that very topic.
675.
Some words of advice on language design(lambda-the-ultimate.org)
2 points by fogus 15y ago|0 comments
676.
Isaac is an OS built with dynamically interconnected prototype objects(isaacos.loria.fr)
2 points by fogus 15y ago|0 comments
677.
by fogus 15y ago
I like to ask both, but the question in the post is much better for generating multifaceted followup discussions much in the vein of your points.
678.
by fogus 15y ago
That's an interesting generalization there. In my time I've encountered many kinds of programmers. Some could create amazing things despite their tool or language. Likewise, there were many who created amazing things with the help of the
679.
by fogus 15y ago
This kind of clarification is exactly why I posted this link. It's great to clear the air in one respect and at the same time ask the question, "is there something on the CS site needing change to avoid this confusion?"
680.
Writing Eloquent JavaScript Without CoffeeScript(oscargodson.com)
57 points by fogus 15y ago|53 comments
681.
What’s New In Emacs 24(masteringemacs.org)
109 points by fogus 15y ago|39 comments
682.
A Month With Scala(w2lessons.com)
51 points by fogus 15y ago|8 comments
683.
Clojure and Logic: Lojic Part Two(clojure.com)
81 points by fogus 15y ago|10 comments
684.
Working Out Inside the Office(nytimes.com)
53 points by fogus 15y ago|28 comments
685.
TDD in Lisp in 1980(dspace.mit.edu)
3 points by fogus 15y ago|0 comments
686.
7 Reasons that Rexx Still Matters(softwarequalityconnection.com)
3 points by fogus 15y ago|0 comments
687.
Harvard Develops Soft-Bodied, Squid-Inspired Robot(idealab.talkingpointsmemo.com)
1 points by fogus 15y ago|0 comments
688.
"It Has Become Fashionable to Use Chemicals on People with Opinions"(dissenter.firedoglake.com)
2 points by fogus 15y ago|0 comments
689.
by fogus 15y ago
Any new McCarthy LISP implementation is destined to provoke the programming equivalent of "git offa mah lawn!"
690.
Avout: Distributed State in Clojure(clojure.com)
121 points by fogus 15y ago|5 comments

More ›