Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
fn-mote
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
151.
▲
by
fn-mote
2mo ago
Maybe, like sarcasm, this kind of joke would be easier to appreciate if tagged somehow. I think everyone agrees the internet is drowning in AI slop. That makes the joke hard to appreciate on its own.
152.
▲
by
fn-mote
2mo ago
Does submitting this kind of PR count against their promotion or productivity? Is there any way it could? Love to hear from companies making progress on this front.
153.
▲
by
fn-mote
2mo ago
Totally fake post. Gemini in the top?? For what?
154.
▲
by
fn-mote
2mo ago
> works an order of magnitude faster This is the weakest part of the argument. Absolutely no reason to believe the second inventor will be 10x faster. Does this ever happen? Even in traditional manufacturing, the second “inventor” starts
155.
▲
by
fn-mote
2mo ago
> first-mover advantage of AGI is even less meaningful This is your opinion. Lots of tech money appears to disagree. You should at least try to explain your contrarian position, or cite your favorite source that makes an argument that yo
156.
▲
by
fn-mote
2mo ago
AI knows how to spell “marketting”.
157.
▲
by
fn-mote
2mo ago
> one with strong social pressures against […] casual relationships . !! Not at all how I expected this to end. Calling it out so skimmers can see something interesting.
158.
▲
by
fn-mote
2mo ago
> None of them have these grueling 15 hour day schedules you’re describing. I have contact with a lot of teens. This schedule is not unusual, although the truth IMO is that long hours and poor productivity form a vicious cycle. > I do
159.
▲
by
fn-mote
2mo ago
This might be true if cable companies did not make a profit. In the US, at least, I think the lack of competition (almost monopoly pricing in most areas) has led to exactly the opposite situation - plenty of profits for the cable providers.
160.
▲
by
fn-mote
2mo ago
> maybe even more so than Mac Lane’s Categories for the Working Mathematician (which I sometimes see suggested […]) FWIW, I am very against this recommendation. That book is needlessly opaque. I don’t know a good recommendation for categ
161.
▲
by
fn-mote
2mo ago
To me the mechanics and the why are closely intertwined. If you feel like self-referentiality is a way to demonstrate a problem (this is the “why”), it is not a long step to the mechanics of encoding. The work is in creating the theorem &#x
162.
▲
by
fn-mote
2mo ago
From this argument, it sounds like your company is making a rational choice to go with what you’re seeing. Even if you don’t like it.
163.
▲
by
fn-mote
2mo ago
1. The computer is going to struggle to recognize elegance. I’m not sure it’s relevant at this point (but who knows). 2. The statement about proofs is just way wrong. It doesn’t sound like you are familiar enough with them. This isn’t exact
164.
▲
by
fn-mote
2mo ago
> converted a fuzzy task into a conventional software engineering problem, and then relying on conventional software for the reliability What can I say? This is how I get results from AI. It also gives me context & tools to fight the
165.
▲
by
fn-mote
2mo ago
For perspective, I agree with the GP. The writing is not perfectly clear. We don’t have enough evidence to know if that was part of the problem.
166.
▲
by
fn-mote
2mo ago
Super interesting, thanks for the reference. I particularly found the note about “local collapse” helpful (near the end of section 3). The idea is that even though benchmarks contain a wide variety of different reasoning tasks, each individ
167.
▲
by
fn-mote
2mo ago
> She probably had the epiphany that life is short and she's already rich. This is a very optimistic take. Most people don’t take this route, so without evidence I don’t think it should be a first guess. No information does not mean
168.
▲
by
fn-mote
2mo ago
> It's like people who send their kids to public school thinking they're really going to be safe and educated I really feel like I missed the /s or something. Or possibly the poster went to a much worse public school than
169.
▲
by
fn-mote
2mo ago
Stop the disingenuous comments please. 1. John Smith is the parent. Giving them power to control what the child visits allows them to do their parenting job. 2. What proposal makes Facebook responsible for anything? Surely none of these. Th
170.
▲
by
fn-mote
2mo ago
Seems like a pretty special use-case.
171.
▲
by
fn-mote
2mo ago
> wrong dosages, and missed prescription notifications. BS. How is the AI touching that information? Prescription notification is outbound communication. It’s almost a recorded message. A little text to speech if it is supposed to read t
172.
▲
by
fn-mote
2mo ago
ASR = Automatic Speech Recognition WER = Word Error Rate Too many acronyms; not everybody is in your field.
173.
▲
by
fn-mote
3mo ago
Follow the link to the chat history. The last item is a full write up.
174.
▲
by
fn-mote
3mo ago
> making the right way as easy as possible I wish I knew what you were talking about here. It seems like the easy way would be to forbid the collection of this data… but that is obviously not happening, so I need a different part 2.
175.
▲
by
fn-mote
3mo ago
You’re asking for a different post. More like a science paper where they say the result up front. This blog post is like a story. It doesn’t start with the ending. I read your comment first, expecting to go to the article and see a bunch of
176.
▲
by
fn-mote
3mo ago
Absolutely not saying this is even the most common case but: people “without ADHD” but with a diagnosis can use the extra time effectively. It is most clear when there is some kind of problem solving involved. An extra 30 min to figure out
177.
▲
by
fn-mote
3mo ago
Nobody is holding up those other guys as shining paragons of virtue either. “Other people did it too” is not an excuse for immoral behavior. I think the parent and I basically agree.
178.
▲
by
fn-mote
3mo ago
> What's going to replace it? Rapidly aging China? Using the age profile of a country with over a billion people to dismiss its geopolitical power has no credibility. More appropriate to point out their (our) lack of domestic chip p
179.
▲
by
fn-mote
3mo ago
> The problem isn't the price. No matter how much you pay, you can't take delivery of a chip that doesn't exist I’m confused because this reads like a denial of basic economics. If the price is high enough, the chip will b
180.
▲
by
fn-mote
3mo ago
Amazing story. I think you’re defending against a level of aggression that most of the world doesn’t believe exists yet. I suppose by the time we believe, it will be too late. There’s a lot of people who will be trying to run LLMs with hack
More ›