fmbb

23 ms·

451.
by fmbb 3y ago
As a layman putting zero effort into looking at this law, is there no validity in the reasoning that letting commercial interests sell any kinds of seeds can lead to crises with invasive species everywhere? I mean more than what already hap
452.
by fmbb 3y ago
It might not even be human error in QA. This might be a code error in the error code code error finding code.
453.
by fmbb 3y ago
The quote says “capitalist democracy” is an oxymoron. If Thiel is pro-capitalism he thinks democracy is a problem. If he is pro-democracy he thinks capitalism is a problem.
454.
by fmbb 3y ago
> When I read a meter, I first need to see where the needle is pointing; that's one step. Then I need to read the start and end of the meter's range or the closest delimiters to the needle on either sides; that's another s
455.
by fmbb 3y ago
Fork it.
456.
by fmbb 3y ago
I think people could be more clear in their language here. Finishing a project is not the same thing as finishing the artifact the project is about. A project to build a house can be completed so that you can sell the house. But someone buy
457.
by fmbb 3y ago
The fact that some powerful organizations are trying to complicate a matter does not make it complicated per se. In my country the law criminalizing theft begins thus: > Stöld > Stöld beskrivs i 8 kap. 1 §. Stöldbrottet förekommer i t
458.
by fmbb 3y ago
The current economic system where (in the US) bribes are “speech” and corporations are people unavoidably leads to things like this project getting neutered. “The invisible hand” Adam Smith refers to are the unintended consequences from mer
459.
by fmbb 3y ago
OK but most business compete in a market. And the people they employ are in a labour market. It seems that worse is better. What we see is just another manifestation of the current economic paradigm. Waste is winning. Making too many pairs
460.
by fmbb 3y ago
In the US, before 1996. The economic power of the USA was arguably built on it.