Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
floodyberry-
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
61.
▲
by
floodyberry-
7y ago
Unless I'm missing something in the calculation, 2^80 / (10 billion * 10ghz) = 12089 seconds, not years, which does flip his point re: 2^128 being uncomfortably risky if you want to factor in potential improvements.
62.
▲
by
floodyberry-
7y ago
"Area man who thinks he's business guru outs self as generic seo spammer"
63.
▲
by
floodyberry-
7y ago
ECC was introduced in 1985, Curve25519 in 2005, and Edwards Curves in 2007 Post-quantum public key algorithms have existed for a while, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McEliece_cryptosystem (1978) and https:/&
64.
▲
by
floodyberry-
7y ago
None of them have been in any competition like AES
65.
▲
by
floodyberry-
7y ago
you can say that again, he definitely stands out from all the other white dudes on here who think they know everything
66.
▲
by
floodyberry-
7y ago
If you're already using programs to help you, I don't see how you can be upset if someone else is cheating better than you are.
67.
▲
by
floodyberry-
7y ago
A useful high language for cryptography would likely have to: * Not compile to C because you'd be left with the same doubts that the generated machine code is constant time * Not use gcc / clang internally to generate machine code
68.
▲
by
floodyberry-
7y ago
You definitely come across as an impartial subject matter expert!
69.
▲
by
floodyberry-
7y ago
I think it means seibelj works for Circle and is shilling their stablecoin. The irony is that the entirety of "crypto" outside of the people doing the academic work for it is not just vaguely sketchy, but extremely sketchy.
70.
▲
by
floodyberry-
7y ago
> The Facebook teams are going to give a presentation with some new plans where they want feedback on This is an "are we off the hook, please say yes" meeting, not a "we don't know how to fix these glaring ethical iss
71.
▲
by
floodyberry-
7y ago
You'll need to annotate or remove a lot more than Theranos if you're worried about truth or ethics
72.
▲
by
floodyberry-
8y ago
How clueless or ineffective do you have to be with what your original idea has turned in to before people stop listening to or caring about your thoughts on it? Oddly, the "meritocracy" crowd don't appear concerned if rich&#x
73.
▲
by
floodyberry-
8y ago
That doesn't explain why Bitcoin is useful for anything other than relieving stupid people of their money?
74.
▲
by
floodyberry-
8y ago
How, exactly, does Bitcoin (and other shitcoins) being nominally 'decentralized', and whose main use after 10 years is still speculation and scams, relate to nazis and right wing trolls occasionally get kicked off twitter?
75.
▲
by
floodyberry-
8y ago
Not to volunteer, but they can be parallelized, just not in the same manner as dalek. Even with the schnorr-style signatures (to avoid scalar inversions) and the endomorphism I still think it'd be slower, the group ops are nasty.
76.
▲
by
floodyberry-
8y ago
Offloading all of the costs and risks on to your unorganized "independent contractors" is the whole point of the gig economy from the business side. You can't disrupt things if you behave responsibly.
77.
▲
by
floodyberry-
8y ago
> and nobody had any significant issues promptly finding a new job (with a salary increase usually :) Way to disprove the myth of upper middle class security!
78.
▲
by
floodyberry-
9y ago
> but I bet smartcard producers are glad someone researched this before they got on the EdDSA train. If the only thing controlling whether they implement something is if they can find negative results on google, I don't think they&#
79.
▲
by
floodyberry-
9y ago
"The billionaire who exploited his wealth and position to engage in and perpetuate consequences free garbage bro culture said sorry like 5 times, what more do you people want?"
80.
▲
by
floodyberry-
10y ago
When you're self reporting how you think you accomplished something and you leave information out, it's not cheating, it's leaving information out. It doesn't mean it's intentional, but not being intentional doesn&#
81.
▲
by
floodyberry-
10y ago
The "Pol Pot Memorial Library" does have a nice ring to it.
82.
▲
by
floodyberry-
10y ago
That Salsa implementation is not being vectorized? Salsa also requires some values to be shuffled around to actually work in SSE registers, djb made a bit of a boo-boo when designing it. Chacha fixes that, so its SIMD implementations are a
83.
▲
by
floodyberry-
10y ago
Basic Chacha C implementations do not get auto-vectorized down to ultra-efficient code. The most efficient implementations are intrinsic/assembler that process 4 (SSE2/AVX/NEON) or 8 (AVX2) Chacha20 blocks at once. This is du
84.
▲
by
floodyberry-
10y ago
"How to ensure everyone is paid fairly" would be a "must read". This is more of a "Employers and potential employees are expected to try and screw each other out of as much money as possible - Here's how you ca
85.
▲
by
floodyberry-
10y ago
It sounds more that both of you are [insanely lucky to be / oblivious of being] well off rather than that you're gifted with exceptional knowledge about marriage.
86.
▲
by
floodyberry-
10y ago
Ok then, you valued your free speech more than the rights of those whose speech you think shouldn't be so free. There isn't anything more to say here.
87.
▲
by
floodyberry-
10y ago
> Why don't you ask me what I think about those issues? You didn't vote for your views, you voted for Trump. You had to believe that whatever would result from a Trump election was at least balanced by your desire to show the l
88.
▲
by
floodyberry-
10y ago
So you were worried that the repercussions for saying whatever you like may be too high, and in exchange you were willing to potentially sacrifice women's rights, minorities rights, lgbt+ rights, the environment, business regulations,
89.
▲
by
floodyberry-
10y ago
Profiting off the chaos seems much more likely than relying on Trump to keep his word or re-pay favors. I'm not sure which is more reprehensible, actually supporting Trump's general platform, or 'merely' hoping his elect
90.
▲
by
floodyberry-
10y ago
Floating point isn't legible either, nor are are bitfields, opcodes, instruction formats, etc. That's why we use computers to do the 'right thing' and format the data if we need to read it. I don't have a preference
More ›