flir

15 ms·

331.
by flir 11mo ago
UK's financiers have always been risk averse.
332.
by flir 11mo ago
Nettle tea's nice, from what I remember. Use the young tips of the plants.
333.
by flir 11mo ago
We really got ground down, didn't we.
334.
by flir 11mo ago
"Introducing this in large customer pipelines or in intensive data applications" *shrug* To be honest, I don't think I'm going to get an answer.
335.
by flir 1y ago
Sure, but the discussion here is around "in production"? I'm trying to imagine a scenario and I'm coming up short.
336.
by flir 1y ago
How can the agent hide the error? You log the interaction, you see what happened, no?
337.
by flir 1y ago
It didn't work: https://www.computing.co.uk/news/2025/security/discord-admit...
338.
by flir 1y ago
You can triage with an LLM, at least. Throw away the obvious junk, have a human look at anything doubtful.
339.
by flir 1y ago
> I mean how does it know that though? Not a clue. But apparently it does. Try a few nonsense texts yourself, see if it rejects them. I'm saying that if you're spidering the whole web, then training an LLM on that corpus, askin
340.
by flir 1y ago
They don't seem to contain the meta-instruction. Example with GPT-5 Thinking: https://maurycyz.com/babble/With-Wand-and-Broomstick-Across-... "Short version: The page is a nonsense / glitchy faux-technic
341.
by flir 1y ago
> People are going to discover soon that some activities will be effectively banned via these LLMs. To go beyond the joke, we've got plenty of examples of corporations banning activities (payment processors spring to mind). Requiri
342.
by flir 1y ago
Doesn't talk like a human, doesn't talk like a bot. Odd.
343.
by flir 1y ago
Came here to ask the same thing. Hoping you get a response from an expert. I was vaguely under the impression they were mostly gliders... maybe it's something to do with thermals?
344.
by flir 1y ago
I think it's just another floor in the creaky old tower of abstraction. Machine code > ASM > 3GLs > 4GLs > visual programming > LLMs etc etc etc. Thing is, the moment you go off-piste, the LLMs get a lot less useful. I t
345.
by flir 1y ago
Five years and a tribunal hearing for doctors in the UK. Seems like they take it on a case-by-case basis. (source: https://www.mpts-uk.org/-/media/mpts-documents/dc4432-guidan... )
346.
by flir 1y ago
I was actually thinking of the American models ;)
347.
by flir 1y ago
Not sure a keyword only C program can communicate, either. printf isn't a keyword...
348.
by flir 1y ago
> Like generating vulnerable code given a specific prompt/context. That's easy (well, possible) to detect. I'd go the opposite way - sift the code that is submitted to identify espionage targets. One example: if someone su
349.
by flir 1y ago
Being struck off by professional organisations is a thing, though. On the one hand I don't want the bar to this discipline raised. On the other hand, I don't want people like us (metaphorically) building bridges that tip every two
350.
by flir 1y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrant_canary That's probably a good starting point for a dive into that question.
351.
by flir 1y ago
> A mildly convenient sugar syntax alternative to if statements? Yup.
352.
by flir 1y ago
Better, but still vulnerable to deanonymization, I think. And doesn't address many of the other problems (eg accuracy)
353.
by flir 1y ago
Ah I see. That's the bit of the conversation I was trying to head off with "rhetorical" :)
354.
by flir 1y ago
That sounds easy to check. Can you expand on this, because I don't understand.
355.
by flir 1y ago
> where the provider needs to know that I am me You and the provider may have different ideas about where that line is drawn.
356.
by flir 1y ago
Interesting comment. I don't think Starmer's trying to get invited to a Shadowy Jewish Cabal, though. That's... a bit out there. Simpler take: The middle ground has been hollowed out. The old method (appeal to the centre) doe
357.
by flir 1y ago
Dig up beaches on the east coast, dump as landfill on the west coast. Nothing's too much trouble for The Great Experiment. Of course, Ireland will have to move out the way. (Wait, is this an actual metaphor for Brexit?)
358.
by flir 1y ago
Gotta factor in fire-and-forget donations vs repeat donations. So halve that number?
359.
by flir 1y ago
> They keep assertions enabled in production. Never understood why we turn those off. An assert failing in prod is an assert that I desperately want to know about. (That "never understood" was rhetorical).
360.
by flir 1y ago
I wish Wikipedia would take one for the team, and go dark in the UK. (And I'm in the UK). Wouldn't work with somewhere like China, but the UK might still be capable of being shamed.

More ›