flanked-evergl

4 ms·

31.
by flanked-evergl 2mo ago
why can't you use hash pinned schemas with existing json? Why do you need a new format for it?
32.
by flanked-evergl 2mo ago
What makes these features unnecessary in 2024 but necessary in 2026?
33.
by flanked-evergl 3mo ago
I live in Norway. Starlink is cheaper than FTTH by a country mile. At the very least it's going to force down prices for fiber providers. Also just because FTTH exists does not mean it's reliable.
34.
by flanked-evergl 3mo ago
[flagged]
35.
by flanked-evergl 3mo ago
What is the future of this? Code is not the same as a viable open-source project with a community, contributors, advocates, users and funding, even if it's perfect code. Even though I'm sure it won't be easy to convince the P
36.
by flanked-evergl 3mo ago
We will keep using Claude because internal choices made by engineers and internal gatekeeping by engineers make everything else unfeasible, and going back on that would require said engineers to admit that they did something stupid, so it&#
37.
by flanked-evergl 3mo ago
Cop body slams a white man and then arrests him after he was assaulted by black people: https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/uk-man-was-assaulted-by-atta... Of course the black people were let go. After all, they did nothin
38.
by flanked-evergl 4mo ago
Does the article provide supporting evidence for your claim that "Even though GET+body is not handled the same everywhere, it's easier to make that the standard than it is to make a new syntax the standard."? Because if it do
39.
by flanked-evergl 4mo ago
But it's not existing behaviour. It does not already exist. Breaking the semantics of something that exists means that things will work inconsistently. Breaking the semantics of get will also create compatibility issues.
40.
by flanked-evergl 4mo ago
> Even though GET+body is not handled the same everywhere, it's easier to make that the standard than it is to make a new syntax the standard. Is there some research or study that you base this claim on? What is the reasoning? Can y
41.
by flanked-evergl 4mo ago
The fact that some infrastructure is poorly maintained is not a reason against evolving protocols, it's a reason to maintain infrastructure better. It's really not that difficult to do.
42.
by flanked-evergl 4mo ago
What does "some random third party" have to do with any of it? An SQL server can expose HTTP directly. SQL is not the only query language that exists. SPARQL's standard protocol for sending Queries uses HTTP[1], and yes, of c
43.
by flanked-evergl 4mo ago
> For one you would never allow a client to dictate the query. That is a security and validation problem. So you have to deconstruct the query anyway and then rebuild it. Every single SQL server allows a client to dictate the query. Furt
44.
by flanked-evergl 4mo ago
Do you think that Anthropic's models would have been pulled if they did not say for months how their models is basically going to break the whole internet and that governments should most definitely restrict AI? I doubt it. The problem
45.
by flanked-evergl 4mo ago
No, it does not feel like that.
46.
by flanked-evergl 4mo ago
How was it stolen, exactly?
47.
by flanked-evergl 4mo ago
Much cheaper to outsource all production and industry to China as Europe is doing.
48.
by flanked-evergl 4mo ago
> I liked the UIs of the entire era from 3.0 to 2000, really. I'm mostly using Windows 2000 as an example here because it runs so well in QEMU/KVM and that allows me to easily take screenshots.
49.
by flanked-evergl 4mo ago
[flagged]
50.
by flanked-evergl 4mo ago
[flagged]
51.
by flanked-evergl 4mo ago
> US companies already stole scores of data to train their models on and it's hard to imagine they suddenly grew some integrity. Can you be specific about what data of yours were stolen by who?
52.
by flanked-evergl 4mo ago
I mean if morality is just personal preference why do we even allude to it at all?
53.
by flanked-evergl 4mo ago
[flagged]
54.
by flanked-evergl 4mo ago
> Guy basically runs the US government, which has been reduced to a banana republic plutocracy. Do you have any evidence of this? As far as I know, he basically never gets what he wants. He was against Trump's Big Beautiful Bill, it
55.
by flanked-evergl 4mo ago
I trust people who are investing their money more than analysts who get paid for writing what everyone wants to hear.
56.
by flanked-evergl 4mo ago
Why is it purely speculative for SpaceX and for nobody else? Is Musk just that good a con man, even though literally everyone hates him?
57.
by flanked-evergl 4mo ago
> zero rational basis Do you really think so? Like everyone who risks their and their clients' money here is just being irrational? Is this really a coherent view? Could it not be that someone knows something you don't, or does
58.
by flanked-evergl 4mo ago
[flagged]
59.
by flanked-evergl 4mo ago
> Lots of countries (including many western countries) have some ethnic parties. That does not mean people will vote for their ethnic groups party - in general most will not. You can vote among ethnic lines without voting for an explicit
60.
by flanked-evergl 4mo ago
> It's Voltaire (1694-1778). Depending how you count, The Enlightenment is or isn't part of modernity. Find me one single definition of Modernity that excludes the 18th century.

More ›