Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
flail
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
61.
▲
Engineering dogmas it's time to retire
(newsletter.manager.dev)
31 points
by
flail
10mo ago
|
52 comments
62.
▲
by
flail
10mo ago
There's a huge difference between nurses or teachers and Ivy League students. Namely, the former are not remotely as prestigious roles. I highly doubt there are 20 candidates for each nurse or teacher job. Affirmative action happens wh
63.
▲
Would You Pay to Have Your Resume Read?
(brodzinski.com)
1 points
by
flail
10mo ago
|
5 comments
64.
▲
Stop Hoarding Tasks Like They're Canned Peaches for the Apocalypse
(humanework.substack.com)
1 points
by
flail
10mo ago
|
0 comments
65.
▲
The Feature Factory Strikes Back: How Output Masquerades as Progress
(paulisthrivving.substack.com)
2 points
by
flail
10mo ago
|
0 comments
66.
▲
AI Features for SaaS: Yay or Nay?
(pawelbrodzinski.substack.com)
1 points
by
flail
10mo ago
|
0 comments
67.
▲
Is Vibe Coding Safe? Benchmarking Vulnerability of Agent-Generated Code
(arxiv.org)
4 points
by
flail
10mo ago
|
1 comments
68.
▲
Expert Beginner Peak: Where Early-Stage Startups Make Costly Mistakes
(pawelbrodzinski.substack.com)
1 points
by
flail
10mo ago
|
0 comments
69.
▲
Why I'm Betting Against the AGI Hype
(notesfromthecircus.com)
40 points
by
flail
10mo ago
|
17 comments
70.
▲
by
flail
11mo ago
> do Altman and Andreesen really believe that, or is it just a marketing and investment pitch? As for Andreessen, I don't think he even cares. As the author writes: "for the venture capitalists that have driven so much of field
71.
▲
by
flail
11mo ago
> Have LLMs learned to say "I don't know" yet? Can they, fundamentally, do that? That is, given the current technology. Architecturally, they don't have a concept of "not knowing." They can say "I don&#
72.
▲
by
flail
11mo ago
> We've got something that seems to be general and seems to be more intelligent than an average human. We've got something that occasionally sounds as if it were more intelligent than an average human. However, if we stick to a
73.
▲
by
flail
11mo ago
What's the lifecycle length of GPUs? 2-4 years? By the time OpenAIs and Anthropics pivot, many GPUs will be beyond their half-life. I doubt there would be many takers for that infrastructure. Especially given the humungous scale of inf
74.
▲
Time to Profit and Why Business Sustainability Matters
(pawelbrodzinski.substack.com)
1 points
by
flail
11mo ago
|
0 comments
75.
▲
We Don't Out-Deliver the Competition. We Outlearn Them
(codemanship.wordpress.com)
2 points
by
flail
11mo ago
|
0 comments
76.
▲
A trillion dollars (potentially) wasted on gen-AI
(garymarcus.substack.com)
127 points
by
flail
11mo ago
|
134 comments
77.
▲
by
flail
11mo ago
> I stopped reading here, which is at the very start of the article (...) > (...) this article is low quality and honestly full of basic errors. Just curious: How do you know it's full of errors, given that you stopped reading at
78.
▲
by
flail
11mo ago
One more interesting aspect: the infrastructure doesn't age that well. We basically need to renew all that infrastructure every, like, 2-4 years or so? (And I think I'm being optimistic here.)
79.
▲
by
flail
11mo ago
I don't think FB was an outlier. I can't be sure, but I don't think there were many (any?) companies that took more than 10 years to profitability pre-2015. I think Twitter took 11 years, and it was 2017. Uber is actually a g
80.
▲
What OpenAI Did When ChatGPT Users Lost Touch with Reality
(nytimes.com)
1 points
by
flail
11mo ago
|
0 comments
81.
▲
Think for Yourself (When Working with LLM-Generated Code)
(kevlinhenney.medium.com)
1 points
by
flail
11mo ago
|
0 comments
82.
▲
A Non-Obvious Answer to Why the AI Bubble Will Burst
(brodzinski.com)
30 points
by
flail
11mo ago
|
21 comments
83.
▲
"Build, Build, Build" Is as Intutive as It Is Wrong
(pawelbrodzinski.substack.com)
4 points
by
flail
11mo ago
|
0 comments
84.
▲
Is Software the UFOlogy of Engineering Disciplines?
(codemanship.wordpress.com)
99 points
by
flail
11mo ago
|
177 comments
85.
▲
'Code quality' doesn't matter because it won't make you successful
(businessinsider.com)
1 points
by
flail
11mo ago
|
0 comments
86.
▲
by
flail
11mo ago
There's Peter's Principle that says that everyone will be promoted till they eventually become incompetent at their job: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_principle And then, gamedev isn't known for th
87.
▲
AI Won't Generate a Good Product Idea
(pawelbrodzinski.substack.com)
2 points
by
flail
11mo ago
|
0 comments
88.
▲
Poor leadership slows down game development
(gamedeveloper.com)
19 points
by
flail
11mo ago
|
4 comments
89.
▲
We Fail to Change (2015)
(brodzinski.com)
1 points
by
flail
11mo ago
|
0 comments
90.
▲
Lovable's ARR is Vanity Metric 2.0
(pawelbrodzinski.substack.com)
2 points
by
flail
11mo ago
|
1 comments
More ›