Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
fkdjs
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
Anecdotal and unscientific in terms of not comparing apples to apples. You would need to show your friends the posts they missed at best, or at least show a competing service, over the same set of messages, which isn't possible. The fact th
32.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
Note that facebook could have handled this by letting users filter, exactly how G+ does it where you put your friends together in circles then you say, "I want this circle, now I want this circle"... FB is controlling that filter because th
33.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
choose the conan1 disk, click cold start, when it says flip disk, choose conan2 disk, hit space, and you're in.
34.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
I fired up conan, figured out the key mappings, then my stored neurons kicked in, found the hidden life then immediately got to the third level without dying. God help anyone trying to figure this game out for the first time. I want to use
35.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
I haven't logged into facebook for a long time but this seems to be what's happening. x) Disallow users from merely being a fan of the page, instead replacing that with "like" x) Now make it so businesses can post to their page and the post
36.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
Microsoft realized these privacy rule changes allow for things like google now, so after criticizing google they realized their stupidity, then copied google, which is their current business plan as of late. I'm betting they're working on t
37.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
Except that is not how antitrust works in the US. Competitors may be harmed if it is for the benefit of consumers. And it may not always be evident that the consumer benefits right away.
38.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
I would say he doesn't know how to play the game. How you play the game is you never break the rules while you make sure people know you're not the bitch. As the person above you said, he should have made vague threats. This is negotiation
39.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
In the US at least, you must prove that the consumer was harmed in order to have a successful antitrust complaint, and that's going to be pretty hard with google. With microsoft, it was a pretty clear pattern, ie rebates to OEMs to thwart c
40.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
True, Tim Cook is smart. He also makes sure Google quickly submits this by... suing every android partner of note. Hey, wait a minute.
41.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
Like notifications?
42.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
And you talk as if iOS didn't copy from android(notifications). That's right, Apple stole Google's innovation. I believe you ignoring this elephant in the room is a logical fallacy.
43.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
And iOS has robbed Android blind (notifications). Anyone can come out tomorrow and write their own search engine. Like Bing. Hell, Bing has even been caught red handed copying. Yet still Google makes money. Anyone remember Google suing Micr
44.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
If anyone should be punished it's the judges. When lawyers tried to use copyright arguments where they should have used patents, Alsup was all over that. Where Apple should have used copyright claims if they wanted to talk about similaritie
45.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
Direct link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ac0E6deG4AU#t=2m50
46.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
Minority Report had the concept, but with two hands. Something new would be the notifications stolen from android. But in any case, it's a patent and companies are required to protect their innovation!
47.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
"Pinch to zoom" is an innovation? Motorola recently sued Apple, and one of the patents covers siri's audible voice prompt, so Apple will have to innovate around that. Also, media playback resume among several devices is Google's innovation.
48.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
A shameless knock off copies _everything_. A shameless rolex copies everything from a rolex. Rolex doesn't copy anything from their knockoffs. There has to be one way copying to classify a product as a knockoff. Instead, Apple has copied ma
49.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
Looks like there can be multiple things that are important to a phone's operation.
50.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
It's the centerpiece for interacting with apps. It's key. In fact, I'm betting it contributed to people confusing android with ios, it's that similar and pervasive. Before they were ripped off the biggest complaint about the iphone was it d
51.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
Uh, Apple has copied android. iOS'es most fundamental feature, notifications, was ripped off from android.
52.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
And Apple made a conscious decision to steal android notifications. It goes both ways and Apple can no longer claim to be the only princess on the block who everyone copies.
53.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
If you compare the two, then you must compare apples with apples. That is, you must compare relational DBs where every column is indexed since with column-oriented DBs, you can search by arbitrary columns without having to worry about which
54.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
Which is a false dichotomy, if you use the right storage mechanism for your column-oriented DB, the comparable relational DB storage will actually be larger since it has to index every column to provide the equivalent of what you can do wit
55.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
"Woops you want to query that column? Better wait 12 hours while we add an index to petabytes of data! Oh shoot, and that column too? Another 12 hours, and you have to use both columns in the where to use the index. " If you are storing xml
56.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
And the bubble deflation barely touched the silicon valley, thanks to employees in the valley engaged in bidding wars on homes. Yes it deflated a little, but that's peanuts compared to other parts of California where people literally lost t
57.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
...and it tanks again. Many facebook employees purchased houses using facebook stock. That is, they didn't have enough income to qualify for a loan, but they showed their facebook stock + current market price(pre-ipo), and got approved that
58.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
I would say this site is too nice to mysql. For stored procedures, mysql had those later whereas postgresql got those right early on. Mysql stored procedures suck donkey balls compared to postgres. Postgres in general just feels better desi
59.
▲
by
fkdjs
14y ago
> hiybbpraqag That just gets farmed out to google ;)