Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
fjkdlsjflkds
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
91.
▲
by
fjkdlsjflkds
4y ago
They probably meant that it is positively homogeneous (i.e. |ax|=|a||x|), I would assume, since it's definitely not a linear function.
92.
▲
by
fjkdlsjflkds
4y ago
Yes. And judges (in the context of the legal system) have generally decided that non-human animals and machines are not entitled to authorship (and copyright) rights, and I don't see "stable diffusion" changing this. So, even
93.
▲
by
fjkdlsjflkds
4y ago
> I expect the competition contains some rule along the lines of "entries must be the entrants own work" or similar. So yes, most likely. This seems too vague/ill-defined. In what way is the entry "not his own work&qu
94.
▲
by
fjkdlsjflkds
4y ago
> For an art competition, the constraints might be things like "don't use AI to generate the image" [...] This is a good point. But... 1) Was that actually explicitly stated as a constraint in this specific art competition
95.
▲
by
fjkdlsjflkds
4y ago
You're probably confusing "cryptographic hash functions" with "perceptual hashing" (or other forms of "locality-sensitive hashing"). In the case of the latter, what you say is almost always not true (that&
96.
▲
by
fjkdlsjflkds
4y ago
Actually, "rés-do-chão" would be the more common term. Still... in Portugal, the "first floor" is implicitly never the ground floor (but the floor above it), so 0-based indexing is respected (as you suggest).
97.
▲
by
fjkdlsjflkds
4y ago
Not to be confused with BlackBoulder...
98.
▲
by
fjkdlsjflkds
4y ago
> It's why regulations are so important and it's why things like NFTs will probably soon be regulated as securities. Please correct me if I am mistaken, but it seems to me that you either fail to understand what an NFT is or fa
99.
▲
by
fjkdlsjflkds
4y ago
The difference is that you can always redeem UST for LUNA, which directly results in minting additional LUNA (the total amount of LUNA in circulation increases when UST is destroyed), while the same does not happen for debt-based stable
100.
▲
by
fjkdlsjflkds
4y ago
Any stablecoin that follows the same logic as DAI (i.e. overcollateralized debt-based stablecoins) could also apply (at least in theory). This includes (but is not limited to) sUSD, MIM, LUSD, MAI, agEUR...
101.
▲
by
fjkdlsjflkds
4y ago
> There's other stable coins with similar mechanisms like Synthetix / SUSD which are also risky, but AT LEAST in their case they require 400% overcollateralization in SNX to mint SUSD. Apples and oranges, really. There is no re
102.
▲
by
fjkdlsjflkds
4y ago
1) Have some collateral (BTC, ETH, USDC, something you somewhat trust); 2) Use collateral to borrow 1M USDT from AAVE/Compound/whatever; 3) Trade 1M USDT for ~1M of some USD-stablecoin you trust (USDC?); 4) Wait for USDT to crash;