fizzbatter

38 ms·

1. 331.▲
   by fizzbatter 12y ago

   I feel like you're being sarcastic about your "congrats", but it is quite the congratulations, based on your first statement. They thrive off this, and appear to seek attention above all else. So.. yea, this is actually quite
2. 332.▲
   by fizzbatter 12y ago

   Such an odd response. How many people are waiting on your doorstep to inform you of information in your local area? I don't think this app does information sharing any better than, say, twitter (far worse, imo) - but i find your resp
3. 333.▲
   by fizzbatter 12y ago

   Well, to be clear, this only affects Mac and Windows, correct? (Technically any case changing os) So, update no matter what, unless you're not on an affected system? (this is a question, not a statement)
4. 334.▲
   by fizzbatter 12y ago

   I'll likely be giving it a try for the weekend, thanks!
5. 335.▲
   by fizzbatter 12y ago

   Is there anything inherently different (security, performance, or otherwise) about these servers of Runabove's? I run a fair amount of dev servers, and that price ($2.50) is mind blowing. But i fear that it's far too cheap to be a
6. 336.▲
   by fizzbatter 12y ago

   I'm not sure who starts it, but they're very clearly (and openly) rolling it out based on not only logical locations, but willingness of cities. Some places are just hard to get into, like Seattle[0]. [0]: http://crossc
7. 337.▲
   by fizzbatter 12y ago

   I can't help but be confused by the point of your comment (not trying to sound mean) . Are you saying that he (we?) shouldn't be developing new languages, and instead focus on "things that matter"? Ie, don't work o
8. 338.▲
   by fizzbatter 12y ago

   So you don't recommend starting fresh?
9. 339.▲
   by fizzbatter 12y ago

   Thanks for this, i had no idea it was even possible to use NeoVim yet! Think i'll spend some time this holiday setting it up, appreciated!
10. 340.▲
    by fizzbatter 12y ago

    Can you not `func(foo){}`? Because that is what would bother me. `func(foo){}` and `(foo) ->` seem too similar, for my taste at least. Sure, the difference is that one is always anonymous, where as one is sometimes anonymous.. but we&#
11. 341.▲
    by fizzbatter 12y ago

    Isn't that a huge problem to solve though? I don't think i've seen a consistent model for this that suppots both Browser and Server(Node). Node is simple, but Browser has a lot of possible implementations, and a lot of prefer
12. 342.▲
    by fizzbatter 12y ago

    > Feels like modularity is missing, though. Is there any support for "require" or "import" or something similar? I haven't personally tested it, but i imagine everything is supported, including require and import
13. 343.▲
    by fizzbatter 12y ago

    The only thing i don't like so far, is `func` and `->` both expressing functions. I use Coffee a ton, and Golang, so oddly enough i love both syntaxes.. but i don't like multiple ways to declare a core feature like functions.
14. 344.▲
    by fizzbatter 12y ago

    Part of me worries about a world where you, as a consumer, have a hard time getting services because of some hidden rating that you cannot shake... But, with that said, i think this is the first time i feel satisfied with consumer accountab
15. 345.▲
    by fizzbatter 12y ago

    Anyone know how hard it would be to get a ReactJS binding setup for this? I was literally just looking into GopherJS (for a normal frontend stuff) - but i'm unsure how gnarly it would be to setup bindings. Part of me fears the output t