fizwhiz

25 ms·

241.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
> TRILLIONS C'mon now, let's not get ahead of ourselves...
242.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
How do I apply for the "Validate much?" employer in the "rm -rf *" location? On another note, searching for the keyword "fuck" yields some interesting entries...
243.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
Could you expound a little further on why the Disruptor pattern looks like a cycle-free Petri Net?
244.
A Short History of the BTree (2011)(perforce.com)
60 points by fizwhiz 11y ago|3 comments
245.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
Your comment about the "JVM update" was a non sequitur trailing from your rant, but I'm glad to know that you were indeed referring to JDK 1.8. The fact that you get excited in the event these nebulous java devs have "he
246.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
What a curious comment. The first portion of your diatribe disparages all java developers, but the latter part of it suggests that you're still working in java shop (perhaps in an ops capacity?) I'm wondering what you meant by JVM
247.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
Your comment is unclear. Are you encouraging people to NOT use DI frameworks, or using them only with constructor-based injection?
248.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
TestNG may have been considered a "modern" alternative years ago, but today jUnit4 has caught up with most (if not all) of testNG's features.
249.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
I read the paragraphs a little like "Spring has code-based config and xml-based config (careful with the xml-based config!) Guice and Dagger don't have xml-based config, so use Guice or Dagger". My gripe is with the hand-wavy
250.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
>> Good alternatives to using Spring is Google and Square's Dagger library or Google's Guice. They don't use Spring's XML configuration file format, and instead they put the injection logic in annotations and in co
251.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
My understanding from briefly skimming the article was that they have forced a "composition" of service orchestration to get from an input to a particular output. From a product standpoint, a particular "experience" coul
252.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
My personal experience at at large tech company is that there are usually designated teams thinking about these infrastructural problems so that the rest of the engineers don't have to worry about them. So as someone managing a "s
253.
Ask HN: Recommended journey on becoming a distributed systems practitioner?
4 points by fizwhiz 11y ago|2 comments
254.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
Much like Groucho Marx: "I shot an elephant in my pajamas... how he got into my pajamas I'll never know."
255.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
Care to elaborate?
256.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
Yeah, I would imagine questions like these that stretch beyond a single runtime or language/framework require experienced people to engage in a meaningful discussion which is why sometimes the topics don't get as much love because
257.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
AFAIK, Stackoverflow gets used for these types of questions a fair amount in a very ad-hoc manner (YMMV in terms of successful responses) and there is a "Code Review" stackexchange; I haven't yet stumbled upon a strictly dedi
258.
Ask HN: Soliciting critique/feedback for your technical architecture?
20 points by fizwhiz 11y ago|11 comments
259.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
>> Random Reads: Indeed LSM Tree ->454 seconds; Kyoto Cabinet B-Tree->50 hours That's ridiculous. AFAIK, Kyoto has the fastest random reads as per a levelDB analysis[1]. Not sure how this stacks up against RocksDB, but stat
260.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
220k-229k
261.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
230k-239k
262.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
240k-249k
263.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
250k-259k
264.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
260k-269k
265.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
270k-279k
266.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
280k-289k
267.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
290k-299k
268.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
300k or more
269.
Ask HN: Annual compensation for full-time software engineers in the bay area
1 points by fizwhiz 11y ago|0 comments
270.
by fizwhiz 11y ago
Less than 80k

More ›