fireflash38

5 ms·

31.
by fireflash38 4mo ago
Why not when it's so trivial?
32.
by fireflash38 4mo ago
They should clearly buy e-ink price displays! /s
33.
by fireflash38 4mo ago
Maple syrup is a big one. I can count on one hand the number of times I've been to even fancy breakfast restaurants and had real maple syrup. Cracker barrel used to, decades ago now. It's all garbage corn syrup now. I'd rathe
34.
by fireflash38 4mo ago
Auditing is assumption of blame or responsibility to another party. They are incentivized to strike the best balance of certifying (who wants to go to a place that never certifies) and validity (rubber stamp mills reflect the blame). Yes, i
35.
by fireflash38 4mo ago
I imagine it goes over about as well as trying to get people to be more vegetarian. Protein has become pretty tightly associated in culture with healthy.
36.
by fireflash38 4mo ago
Why would anyone spend time reading something that someone couldn't even spend the time to write themselves?
37.
by fireflash38 4mo ago
People have seen others make insane, life changing money at this slot machine and are wanting to take their chances. There are no fundamentals. There is very low signal to the noise.
38.
by fireflash38 4mo ago
I download an attachment from a colleague. I edit it and save it. I try to send the updated file back via outlook... And it says the file is not available. This is one of the most basic operations that people do! Why does it not work? Why w
39.
by fireflash38 4mo ago
OneDrive is awful. Why are my files I created on my local device not on my device
40.
by fireflash38 5mo ago
That is a complete distraction from Meta in particular selling social media hard to kids even knowing that their work explicitly caused mental harm. This is not a I own stock am I culpable issue, it is a company knowing their product is dan
41.
by fireflash38 5mo ago
Under Biden they at least tried
42.
by fireflash38 5mo ago
They claim greed because they always choose the path that makes them more money even if it has clear, evidence-based proof of societal harm. Ya know, just like the Sacklers and pushing oxycontin.
43.
by fireflash38 5mo ago
Speaking over people on a microphone and loudspeaker isn't open debate either
44.
by fireflash38 5mo ago
You're not wrong. It's almost a religious fervor. And much like so many religious figures, you get a sort of Rorschach test on how you use/view it. Is it a tool? Is it going to make humans obsolete? Doesn't matter becaus
45.
by fireflash38 5mo ago
Thanks for the really detailed response!
46.
by fireflash38 5mo ago
Do most clients do a constant throughput or do they do bursts? Because speed does matter a lot if it's burst (send 100MB to fill a buffer, then wait). The faster you fill whatever buffer, the faster you can let another client use the c
47.
by fireflash38 5mo ago
The answer that no one likes: make it cost a nominal amount of money. Enough to make it so bots are expensive to run.
48.
by fireflash38 5mo ago
Do you seriously believe that is not happening now? Or that even a libertarian utopia could manage to achieve agreement? If you're going to get philosophical, go all the way. Why have society at all because it's just people imposi
49.
by fireflash38 5mo ago
Now count up the .NET runtime dlls too!
50.
by fireflash38 5mo ago
Free market depends on relatively equal knowledge. If there is significant knowledge disparity it's no longer free. Internet initially helped consumers with knowledge. Now that balance has shifted to more and more corporations knowing
51.
by fireflash38 5mo ago
All the models I have used will frequently jump ahead a ton of steps and not verify any of its assumptions. From generating a ton of code output I didn't ask for, to making a ton of assumptions about what I'm working on without ap
52.
by fireflash38 5mo ago
We are returning to feudalism, with a cyberpunk spin on it. You will not own anything. You don't even really own your tech now. The writing is on the wall: you will not be allowed to modify what you own.
53.
by fireflash38 5mo ago
I don't get why people are so gung-ho about these companies having a moat. As a user and a consumer, I don't want them to have a moat. Moat means pseudo-monopoly. That is the exact opposite of what we want. Only the investors and
54.
by fireflash38 6mo ago
Where do attempts to steal the election land on the spectrum of |not ok to kidnap - - - - - - - ok to kidnap|?
55.
by fireflash38 6mo ago
Shift enter should always put in a new line. Good luck exiting a block though with it.
56.
by fireflash38 6mo ago
It's because enter does different things at different times in the exact same text box. Write a code snippet/block text. Does [enter] insert a newline, exit the block, or send the message? What about in a bulleted or numbered list
57.
by fireflash38 6mo ago
Judge people by actions not what they say. You are arguing the opposite, that we should judge by what they say and not what they do?
58.
by fireflash38 6mo ago
So it's OK now? Or it wasn't OK then or now? You claim about fallacies later, but this is a also a fallacy.
59.
by fireflash38 6mo ago
I imagine the entire Joe Rogan sphere with being anti vax (or vax skeptical)... While promoting a billion supplements.
60.
by fireflash38 6mo ago
If your HSM vendor isn't actively working on/have a release date for GA PQ, you should probably get a new vendor.

More ›