fiedzia

39 ms·

421.
by fiedzia 10y ago
Its accurate.
422.
by fiedzia 10y ago
It depends on what X,Y and Z are. What you may like about go if you come from: python/ruby: go is faster and allows you to write concurrent code php/js: go is faster, concurrent, and its designers were competent c/c++: go is
423.
by fiedzia 10y ago
Generally it seems that you know what you are doing, so the idea looks good. However I've got few comments: 1. Lack of schema is a horrible idea, especially at the beginning. It may be necessary in some selected places, but if that&#x2
424.
by fiedzia 10y ago
Wild guess... click the big "get started" button on elm website and read the documentation it leads to?
425.
by fiedzia 10y ago
SQLAlchemy is an orm, not a database. Find out what your database will be and check if it has support for full text search. Some do, some don't.Also look at solr and elasticsearch.
426.
by fiedzia 10y ago
Official aws cli client is written in python and supports every aws feature, so you could not go wrong with that. I wouldn't touch PHP and Node - to fragile and messy to depend on them. So API-wise python would be my first choice, java
427.
by fiedzia 10y ago
Note that many people use the term "guy" without relation to sex or even being a person.
428.
by fiedzia 10y ago
Yes, you are missing a framework. With a decent one you'll get all of that for free, without doing anything at all . Try Django, and you'll get user, validation, authentication and more out of the box.
429.
by fiedzia 10y ago
Hm, I've never tried that, might work. I've needed this for running tests, where I really don't care for reliability, so I've just set tablespace on ram fs. Creating new files would still cause fs writes, but it might n
430.
by fiedzia 10y ago
First, postgres really is great. The few things I'll list here do not make me willing to replace it with something else, however: 1. Tooling is not on par with other databases. If you want nice GUI that holds your hand and does everyth
431.
by fiedzia 10y ago
With jenkins
432.
by fiedzia 10y ago
It is easy to replace one design with another and people want to be unique in this aspect anyway.If someone would create a calendar app, and you would like to replace it with another, its perfectly fine if visually they would be slightly di
433.
by fiedzia 10y ago
Not much of a things that aren't there at all, but polishing existing libraries would be really useful. Many of them have substantial gaps in features. Of the things I looked at recently: email sending, network libraries, web framework
434.
by fiedzia 10y ago
Big +1 for fpc, though its been long time since I've used it.
435.
by fiedzia 11y ago
Rust/django user here, but ... its 2016, micoservices has been invented long time ago, so use best tool for the job. As for other things: SSL can be terminated by AWS/nginx/whatever, so no need to worry about that. Every ORM
436.
by fiedzia 11y ago
I see two options. 1) - let them do it. Give them list of requirements, 2 days, then pass it to QA and let them deal with all the fixes. Then measure how much time it actually took to get 100% of required functionality. That's the best
437.
by fiedzia 11y ago
I'm in similar situation and rust worked well for me, also having practical benefit of nicely complementing python. Otherwise you may try something functional: f#, scala or haskell.
438.
by fiedzia 11y ago
You can write databases and other things in java/scala and people sometimes do so (though often use lower level languages for more control), but to do it efficiently you'll need deeper understanding of how whole stack works, inclu
439.
by fiedzia 11y ago
Well, if you language works on js interpreter designed for js only, its hard to create very different language, so we fix what we can, hover small it is. For now tools like emscripten are incredibly unpractical and come with high cost that
440.
by fiedzia 11y ago
The degree of this reliance varies greatly, and its better to choose tools that minimise or eliminate this. We can now do better then C, so let's kill it. Btw. just today OpenSSH got another buffer overflow found. One that exposes priv
441.
by fiedzia 11y ago
See typescript, coffescript and dart. They do exist only to avoid js and go around its issues. And a lot of people use them in production.
442.
by fiedzia 11y ago
> I disagree, all languages have the potential to be misused by poor programmers and it's the developer who is the source of the bug. We can easily fix tools and processes, we will never fix people. Sure, all languages allow to crea
443.
by fiedzia 11y ago
You can thank C/C++ for vast majority of software bugs. Billions of dollars and decades of productivity setback, and prognosis of fixing those issues for many years to come. All languages and tools that rely on people not making mistak
444.
by fiedzia 11y ago
When you work on improving performance, memory management is your domain.
445.
by fiedzia 11y ago
If you want to be fully compatible with C++, you have to be fully compatible with all its issues and design mistakes. If those could be fixed without sacrificing compatibility, they would be fixed within C++ already. In case of rust, such c
446.
by fiedzia 11y ago
I've seen rust compiler bug once and that was long before 1.0. The only issue now is that some important API's are not yet declared stable (RFC still being open), so many 3rd-party libraries target nightly and won't work in s
447.
by fiedzia 11y ago
"However, the memory safety is not a productivity improvement as more of a safety improvement." I disagree. It frees you from chasing safety bugs and allows to invest more time in the features and that's clearly productivity
448.
by fiedzia 11y ago
Well, it may teach you why its a good idea to throw away old features every couple of decades :-)
449.
by fiedzia 11y ago
Backend is mostly about storying, querying, shuffling and processing data. Ask dba for books on sql, he will recommend you something - do some excersise on optimizing queries for particular database to understand how it works. Get familiar
450.
by fiedzia 11y ago
Run the job through something that will do it, there is no need for this feature to be provided by cron itself.

More ›