fiatjaf

75 ms·

1. 841.▲
   by fiatjaf 9y ago

   There should be an "alt" attribute that specifies to the transcriber what the face means. Nevertheless, I'm very satisfied that they're using emoticons and not emoji.
2. 842.▲
   by fiatjaf 9y ago

   What is wrong with that? If the cars fail, the search engine still works. Google is allowed to fail too, right?
3. 843.▲
   by fiatjaf 9y ago

   Nice app. I guess this is a perfect match for https://remotestorage.io/ integration. People would be able to save and tweak their card templates without worrying.
4. 844.▲
   by fiatjaf 9y ago

   What do you mean? What is the death of the Conpenhagen interpretation?
5. 845.▲
   by fiatjaf 9y ago

   In more-or-less the same niche as Gatsby there is my Sitio[1], which also uses React (so kinda isomorphic pages), main differences being: - No GraphQL stuff, but instead you'll use imperative JS code to tell the library which pages you
6. 846.▲
   by fiatjaf 9y ago

   It's odd that this has gotten so many upvotes while there are thousands of other static site generators[1] and this one doesn't even provide a single explanation as to why it is different or why would someone prefer this over one
7. 847.▲
   RS Inspektor: A simple remoteStorage file browser(inspektor.5apps.com)

   1 points by fiatjaf 9y ago|0 comments
8. 848.▲
   by fiatjaf 9y ago

   My question was actually: who's using Secure Scuttlebutt?
9. 849.▲
   by fiatjaf 9y ago

   Why would you want SQL on the browser? You cannot sync it to any SQL backend. Are you shipping pure client-side apps with complex data structures?
10. 850.▲
    by fiatjaf 9y ago

    Honest question: who's using ssb://?
11. 851.▲
    by fiatjaf 9y ago

    Thank you ending the "like" era.
12. 852.▲
    by fiatjaf 9y ago

    I love jq and I wish I could write full programs using the jq funcional language, but this fx thing is great. Mostly because its lack of learning curve, fx is much better positioned to be used by all people who don't love jq but just u
13. 853.▲
    by fiatjaf 9y ago

    I use Browserify and it works great. Maybe there are some legitimate cases in which you would prefer Webpack, but I really don't understand why have EVERYBODY migrated to Webpack, with all its bloat and breaking changes and build error
14. 854.▲
    by fiatjaf 9y ago

    Not true. Have you even read the link?
15. 855.▲
    by fiatjaf 9y ago

    Lightning on Stellar? I don't understand why this is desirable.
16. 856.▲
    by fiatjaf 9y ago

    Stupid idea. They had a nice platform for dealing with data, then they pivoted into another nice platform for dealing with data, then again. But in the end they wanted to create a visual programming language for non-tech people or something
17. 857.▲
    by fiatjaf 9y ago

    So it doesn't use IPFS at all.
18. 858.▲
    by fiatjaf 9y ago

    Amazingly useful, I would say. Two use cases I hadn't thought of. (Actually I just thought about jokes.)
19. 859.▲
    by fiatjaf 9y ago

    Really nice. What's the original intended use?
20. 860.▲
    by fiatjaf 9y ago

    Well, you should do a lot of things. The difficult part is to know what is worth doing.
21. 861.▲
    by fiatjaf 9y ago

    Here we see the problem with using IPFS for, let's say, "dynamic" applications.
22. 862.▲
    by fiatjaf 9y ago

    So you write a chat message, store it on IPFS and then send the hash to the other party? Why don't you just send the message through whatever means you're sending the hash? This kind of app doesn't seem like a good fit for th
23. 863.▲
    by fiatjaf 9y ago

    Looks great. I like the fact that the site is not shiny-modern-with-background-video but the product itself is very powerful.
24. 864.▲
    Show HN: Share files on IPFS and pin them to geographic locations(filemap.xyz)

    1 points by fiatjaf 9y ago|0 comments
25. 865.▲
    by fiatjaf 9y ago

    How does it work? Who host the files?
26. 866.▲
    by fiatjaf 9y ago

    Horrible news. Now this stupid thing will be less horrible and will keep people who were leaving. Or maybe it will just go back to the point it was when I left, in 2013, which was already very unbearable.
27. 867.▲
    by fiatjaf 9y ago

    Stronghold[0] works great with me. [0]: https://stronghold.co/
28. 868.▲
    by fiatjaf 9y ago

    I disagree about the rant. I like when sites explain how and why they're different and better than the traditional services.
29. 869.▲
    by fiatjaf 9y ago

    This is beautiful.
30. 870.▲
    by fiatjaf 9y ago

    This is amazing. You can write HTML, JS, everything! Perhaps you should allow returning Promises, defining variables or requiring pieces of code from other parts. I'm thinking about what we can do with this that is impossible with Exce