fhennig

8 ms·

61.
by fhennig 2y ago
Hmm. What about the difference between building a house from a blueprint vs building software from tickets? IMO the blueprint is a much clearer plan. EDIT: In fact, I'd argue that the software is more like the blueprint itself than the
62.
by fhennig 2y ago
I'm curious about where you moved from to put your comment into perspective. Would you mind sharing? In understand if you don't want to.
63.
by fhennig 2y ago
I agree! I switched because of their calendar integration. I needed an email tool that would send 'accept' replies to calendar invites send from outlook and google, and I landed on proton. To any self-hosters if you have a working
64.
by fhennig 2y ago
Whether the price is fair or not is obviously up to you. I personally don't like the deal, so I would rather use alternatives. IMO your quotation marks around _free_ do a lot of heavy lifting.
65.
by fhennig 2y ago
I like it! I recently got quite interested into different ways of looking at the "seasonality" of the year, financial quarters are definitely also a way to look at it. I really like looking at the way the sun defines stuff, I made
66.
by fhennig 2y ago
I really like the idea, but I'm not sure how the traditional "Made in Germany" success stories would translate into a digital world. For example Würth is the world leading producer of screws. I think it's a good example
67.
by fhennig 2y ago
> And I'm also not sure what is proposed here to be done now. The article lists 4 things under "What Should Be Done Next?" - Given your don't I think I can also be a bit snarky and ask: Have you read the article?
68.
by fhennig 2y ago
I don't think it's a good idea to have a mix of both in a codebase, because then you'll have to be good at both - kind of defeats the purpose.
69.
by fhennig 3y ago
I think the feeling that it's bad is made worse if you've been a long time user, because I remember that it used to be better. I dislike that they pushed so much for the liked playlist thing, and that it's now a bit tedious t
70.
by fhennig 3y ago
I think it's probably more if you are not aware of tuning stereo width or stuff like that, it'll get you to a nice "default". But obviously if you're more knowledgable you might tune this yourself. For loudness ther
71.
by fhennig 3y ago
I did a music course last summer and met some prefessional musicians and also sound engineers working for big record labels. I saw specifically LANDR in action. I think like all of these new AI tools, it can be a tool for you to use, but an
72.
by fhennig 3y ago
When I get to a point where I'm second guessing like the author ("Should I follow-up or not?") I try to go with actually listening to what the other person said. In this case, Jimmy said "please follow-up if you have que
73.
by fhennig 3y ago
> It's just a small amount of rambling about how to write comedy routines. Uh .. what? It isn't about this, and your dismissive tone is uncalled for.
74.
by fhennig 3y ago
Your comment comes of as a bit dismissive, but I'm trying to take your word here. A quick google search shows that the there have been policies [0] to prevent ocean dumping of nuclear waste due to adverse effects on the environment. It
75.
by fhennig 3y ago
> We can roughly break the costs of operating any power plant into three categories: fuel costs, operation and maintenance costs, and capital costs The article forgets to mention another cost: The cost of disposing/storing used up f
76.
by fhennig 4y ago
I read the thread, and it is said that by now the implementation cannot be changed without breaking a lot. But there are multiple workarounds and fixes you can apply depending on your situtation. There also seems to be a new HTML renderer w
77.
by fhennig 4y ago
Hmm, but you will probably like to link to something, right? Do you just put links in your Markdown? Do you link to markdown files an post-process when rendering to HTML (or maybe you don't render it at all)?
78.
by fhennig 4y ago
I find this view a bit simplistic. As a reader I find it much easier to follow if I don't have to piece information together from different documents. Including relevant sections in the correct place will improve the flow of the text a
79.
by fhennig 4y ago
I see a lot of comments in this thread mentioning that it is only Ruby, but there is asciidoctor.js [1], a JS implementation. I'm using it at my company for the docs, together with Antora. It's the only docs system I have used ex
80.
by fhennig 6y ago
It's true that hydro has a huge impact on the environment, but it is good for the climate. I think it can be worth it to build some hydro power to replace coal. If we don't, and the climate is fucked, then not having built the d
81.
by fhennig 6y ago
For OP it might be a good idea though, given that the infrastructure is their biggest cost and they have not revenue.
82.
by fhennig 6y ago
Yes! I feel this quite a lot, I've just finished my degree. I remember reading quite a few papers for my thesis where there is little discussion of the actual data that is used, what might be graspable from the data with basic DS tec
83.
by fhennig 6y ago
I agree that it's a shame that many research results do not get to be "industrialized" and actually used, but also I feel like many research results are created in such a sterile way that they wouldn't be applicable to r
84.
by fhennig 6y ago
Microsoft says they love open source right? They could just provide an easy API for the data that underlies the trending page, and there could be multiple spin-off projects that rank projects differently. Same for many of the other suggest
85.
by fhennig 6y ago
I've been working on an interactive music-to-light device! It's a few LED stripes connected to a Raspberry Pi and they take sound input from an AUX-in and can be controlled with a PS3 controller. Demo video: https://you
86.
by fhennig 6y ago
I know, people are joking about how it's not usable. But still there are a lot of people using it! So maybe it's not actually an issue for adoption, so I wonder why this argument comes up with emacs then, which, in my opinion, is
87.
by fhennig 6y ago
What does that mean? In vi if I press "i" I can't use the arrow keys to navigate the text as normal. In emacs I can. I'd say using the arrow keys for navigation in text fields is a very widely accepted functionality. So
88.
by fhennig 6y ago
I would like to understand why vim does not seem to have this problem? I guess as stated below, it's just they way it is marketed. Because the way I see it, emacs is much easier to start out with than vim. If I start emacs, I can navig
89.
by fhennig 6y ago
> Vim might be hard, but [...] it makes much more sense than Emacs. Counter-point: I think emacs makes much more sense. If you start it, you can navigate a file by clicking in places. It is a GUI application, whereas I think vim is just
90.
by fhennig 6y ago
> That means startup performance. Or the server/client setup could just be the default and the server starts at system boot.

More ›