Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
fghtr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
61.
▲
Golem Foundation
(golem.foundation)
1 points
by
fghtr
7y ago
|
0 comments
62.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
https://golem.network is the project to make decentralized computing possible. They already have beta version released.
63.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
Yes! https://tehnoetic.com/mobile-devices
64.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
Qubes OS: https://qubes-os.org
65.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
>Which of the nonprofits was the best run? One can try to search for corresponding nonprofits with https://CharityNavigator.org . For example, there are https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.sum
66.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
Similar (worse) things happen to relatively small organizations relying on PayPal: https://minifree.org/paypal/#paypalbastards
67.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_surveillance_in_the_Unite...
68.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
Consider peertube instead.
69.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
Why would scientists write good code with documentation if it is not recognized for their career?
70.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
I am not an expert, but maybe free search engine YaCy[0] could be modified for that purpose. [0] https://yacy.net
71.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
Apart from this obvious problem, there is also a problem of freedom: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/javascript-trap.html
72.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
You should try I2P, it is very similar to the old Internet.
73.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
>Firefox makes money by its search deal with Google Of course, development costs a lot. They will not need to rely on Google in the future if more people donate to them regularly. Consider donating to Firefox.
74.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_surveillance#Purposes
75.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
>In our current internet, we need a big brother like Google or Bing to effectively find any relevant information in exchange for sharing with them our search history, browsing habits etc. The evil big brothers may not be necessary. We ju
76.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
If you are talking about personal CO2 imprint, then here you go: http://www.kimnicholas.com/uploads/2/5/7/6/25766487/fig1full...
77.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
> Is it a problem that Technology can solve (I'm thinking about startup in the privacy field) Probably yes, at least in part. See https://puri.sm .
78.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
Maybe it was true a hundred years ago, but it is not true today, unfortunately. Science became much more complicated. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20190468
79.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
There should be definitely some exceptions from this legislation as usually.
80.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
I am not sure this would be as useful as the new method of "pre-registered studies" [0], where the null findings appear automatically in the publications. Null findings are not the goal of this approach, but a side effect. Importa
81.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
Probably not the answer you would expect, but one very simple action you could do is to sign/share this petition: https://publiccode.eu .
82.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
This is a very sad state of affairs, therefore I would like to bring your attention to a petition towards open sourcing all scientific (and generally tax-paid) software: https://publiccode.eu
83.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
The topic under discussion is response to any serious disaster, not specifically civilian.
84.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
> Can you imagine that the US would have been able to respond like this? Either today or in the 80s? I can't. You are exactly right: U.S. put nuclear waste under a dome on a Pacific island. Now it’s cracking open (washingtonpost.co
85.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
YaCy is not a meta-search engine.
86.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
>great option for all the spectrum (From Google search to DuckDuckGo) You probably mean from SearX to YaCy.
87.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
No. Here is what we actually should do: http://www.kimnicholas.com/uploads/2/5/7/6/25766487/fig1full... Upd: apart from the carbon tax, of course.
88.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
So Apple goes the opposite way compared with Purism: making different OS for every device. What's the point?
89.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
Check out recent discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20050764
90.
▲
by
fghtr
7y ago
> Anyone who didn't think this was happening is simply not paying attention. This is not so simple. Previous replies to similar claims: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20052749 and https://news.ycomb
More ›