ffsm8

20 ms·

421.
by ffsm8 8mo ago
While I don't subscribe to the idea that you shouldn't look at the code - it's a lot more plausible for devs because you do actually have ways to validate the code without looking at it. E.g you technically don't need to
422.
by ffsm8 8mo ago
The prediction markets always favored trump winning the election though. From my perspective the only people that seriously thought she was gonna win were politically captured or just plain in denial.
423.
by ffsm8 8mo ago
Okay, but the install script is around 200 LOC and the peon.sh is just under 500 LOC ... So by your own numbers, it'd be expected loc size? What's exactly over engineered here? The fact he added config files to let people create t
424.
by ffsm8 8mo ago
Uh, are you sure you did? I mean it's just using the hooks API of Claude code to play a sound via the terminal itself? Heck, they even outlined it in the readme > peon.sh is a Claude Code hook registered for SessionStart, UserPrompt
425.
by ffsm8 8mo ago
If you went to the website, you'd know there are multiple sets to choose from and create your own
426.
by ffsm8 8mo ago
For the record, opus 4.6 was released less then a week ago. That you think corporations are anything close to quick enough to update their communications on public releases like this only shows that you've never worked in corporate
427.
by ffsm8 8mo ago
Really? I thought it was only I phones that did that though?
428.
by ffsm8 8mo ago
Theoretically, just thinking about the problem... You could probably embrace offline first and sync to indexeddb? After that search would become simple to query. Obviously comes with it's own challenges, depending on your user base (e.
429.
by ffsm8 8mo ago
Well adjusted people so not want that power over other people It's sociopaths and narcissists which want it. And as Atlas667 pointed out, it's also a direct consequence from a capitalistic world view, where it has replaced your mo
430.
by ffsm8 8mo ago
I think you're misunderstanding what I was trying to convey. The thing I thought worth to ponder was the fact that you're deriving value out of what you've identified here as "a bunch of chatbots talking with each other&
431.
by ffsm8 8mo ago
It's good to keep in mind that the agentic loop, what you're using AI tools with daily is essentially that, too. The tooling just hide the interactions and back and forth nowadays. So if you think you're getting value out of
432.
by ffsm8 8mo ago
I am still missing something like Claude code that's less "hands-off" and optimizes for small edits instead of full feature development Like you're sitting in your ide, select a few rows, press (for example) caps lock to
433.
by ffsm8 8mo ago
Yes, and you then followed it up with pointing out yourself how this is just your unfounded opinion because the example you cited doesn't actually reflect the situation you extrapolated to, because the UK is not part of the EU
434.
by ffsm8 8mo ago
okay,the preceding paragraph I referenced of yours was > It's the same with arms purchases now. France blocked Ukraine from using its money to buy British made weapons that are already available, since it expects that money to go b
435.
by ffsm8 8mo ago
The preceding example to the quotes excerpt. I was just under the seemingly mistaken assumption you'd remember the contents of your own comment.
436.
by ffsm8 8mo ago
It's not a bad idea, generally. it depends on the implementation. If you're updating it multiple times per second, then yes, it's a bad idea. Now go check if they're doing it or you're just suggesting from the dunni
437.
by ffsm8 8mo ago
> Yeah I know, UK isn't EU anymore, but the point still stands, as EU nations are still economically competitors to each other and they're not gonna spend their tax money to fund competing economies even in the EU block. Uh, no
438.
by ffsm8 8mo ago
Obviously, you don't need the model abstraction for any software, ever. It is just more or less suited for a domain. And in this case, as would be obvious from thinking about it, the only part it's not suited for is the live syn
439.
by ffsm8 8mo ago
https://github.com/suitenumerique/docs/blob/main/src/backend... I see, in your broad and experienced mind, document editors don't have users, permissions, and the whole document management itse
440.
by ffsm8 9mo ago
What issue do you have with Django? This is not a situation where you'll have thousands of people editing the same document, that'd be insane with Django for sure - but at general collaboration tooling with <100 (random number
441.
by ffsm8 9mo ago
Strange, for me it only comes back up if I get baited into clicking on any short (or have one linked to me)
442.
by ffsm8 9mo ago
You can't turn it off entirely, but if you keep using "show less shorts" from the 3 dot menu it eventually goes away, mostly...
443.
by ffsm8 9mo ago
People are way worse at detecting LLM written short form content (like comments, blogs, articles etc) then they believe themselves to be... With CVs/job applications? I guarantee you, if you'd actually do a real blind trial, you&
444.
by ffsm8 9mo ago
Depending on their technical capability, yes. I mean even in this thread you got what are essentially one-liners to do it. Definitely less hassle then doing it irl
445.
by ffsm8 9mo ago
> Honestly, reading your link got me seriously facepalming . You were unable to figure that out despite that sentence? Wow
446.
by ffsm8 9mo ago
It's a real issue, but why do you only see it in ai? It's true for any case where you're speaking into a microphone Depending on the permissions granted to apps on your mobile device, it can even be passively exfiltrated with
447.
by ffsm8 9mo ago
Subsidize? What? How are you subsidizing anything when it's just recognized as volunteering? You can at most put that on your Einkommensteuererklärung for a deduction on taxes... Calling that's subsidizing, idk man, feels massive
448.
by ffsm8 9mo ago
> have no idea how anyone could reasonably draw that conclusion from this thread. > > Honestly, reading your link got me seriously facepalming. The whole argument seems to be centered around the fact that sexualizing children is d
449.
by ffsm8 9mo ago
You're wrong - at least from the perspective of the commons. First paragraph on Wikipedia > Child pornography (CP), also known as child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and by more informal terms such as kiddie porn,[1][2][3] is erotic
450.
by ffsm8 9mo ago
He made no judgement in his comment, he just observed the fact that the term csam - in at least the specified jurisdiction - applies to generated pictures of teenagers, wherever real people were subjected to harm or not. I suspect none of u

More ›