Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ffriend
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
by
ffriend
11y ago
Not sure what you mean by "web scrapper" than, but if you just need something to download web pages (in addition to parsing HTML), then Requests.jl covers it pretty well. IIUC from GitHub page, AWS.jl has most API implemented, jus
32.
▲
by
ffriend
11y ago
> Until you need to do something very straightforward like web scraping or interacting with AWS For web scrapping: https://github.com/porterjamesj/Gumbo.jl For AWS: https://github.com/JuliaParallel&#
33.
▲
by
ffriend
11y ago
often from the core language team Very friendly core language team, by the way :)
34.
▲
by
ffriend
11y ago
1. Speed in iterative algorithms. 2. (Almost) painless concurrency. 3. Symbolic programming right in the language (think of SymPy built in the language). 4. Closeness to Matlab (which makes it easy to translate existing code). In general, p
35.
▲
by
ffriend
12y ago
Ah, yeah, I remember discussion about this, but didn't know about its result (I'm not active Java developer for some time now). Anyway, I think you've got an idea - immutability assumption may be pretty useful and improve per
36.
▲
by
ffriend
12y ago
> The CBV class hierarchy is complex enough that someone had to make this site to help everyone keep them straight: http://ccbv.co.uk/ It's funny how your comment compromises OOP - even in Django class-based views m
37.
▲
by
ffriend
12y ago
Intagram's website is small? Ok, so show me the large one written in Java. But let's agree: this should really be web site/web interface, not some back-end service in large distributed system like Twitter or LinkedIn, because
38.
▲
by
ffriend
12y ago
> The main consideration is the tradeof between performance(best for mutability) vs ease of use of development (best for immutability) No, no, no. Immutable data structures are not actually inefficient, they are just different. They were
39.
▲
by
ffriend
12y ago
Sorry, but both of these benchmarks are terrible. First link compares run time of the whole programs, including start-up time, time for parsing file and printing out resulting matrix. I'm pretty sure matrix multiplication was the faste
40.
▲
by
ffriend
12y ago
> Once real systems (like UI frameworks) are written with FP, we can compare apples to apples. Until then...wtf? OO actually works well for scaling complexity, much better than toy immutable functions do. Seems like we are working on ver
41.
▲
by
ffriend
15y ago
Yes, it looks like these guys were not pretty honest. I had similar challenge (one week "test" assignment that was a part of a bigger project), but I was paid for my time and then continued to work with employer. But don't be upset - if the