ffgjgf1

76 ms·

1081.
by ffgjgf1 3y ago
Yeah by Xbox I mean the console + game pass + PC/Xbox gaming division. The console itself at this point is not much more than a cheap(ish) locked down gaming PC.
1082.
by ffgjgf1 3y ago
> Out of all of them, I think Microsoft is the most likely to fail, as they are likely to be blindsided when the user-focussed desktop OS That might have been a reasonable assessment back in Balmer’s era. But what you saying has already
1083.
by ffgjgf1 3y ago
There was some competition amongst consumer goods producers and TV and other ads in the UUSR. High scarcity of good quality stuff meant they didn’t need to advertise but there was also an oversupply of junk nobody needed. Those companies ha
1084.
by ffgjgf1 3y ago
What actions and why? Weren’t the sanctions widely supported by most European countries?
1085.
by ffgjgf1 3y ago
There were already quite inflated for at least half a year or so prior to the war.
1086.
by ffgjgf1 3y ago
Not taking steps to decrease Europe’s reliance on Russia fossil fuels in the years after Putin took power was immensely idiotic. Both politically and economically. At this point there was no non-painful way to do this.
1087.
by ffgjgf1 3y ago
> it prevents Russia from having direct control on energy supplies in Europe, which improves Europe's ( This mainly applied to gas and not oil though. The point of the sanctions is to primarily decreases Russia’s oil revenue.
1088.
by ffgjgf1 3y ago
> For example, if the largest models are trained and shared as open source and only inference is done locally, its dominant position will be erode much faster. Open source models would still need to be trained on Nvidia’s HW? I agree wit
1089.
by ffgjgf1 3y ago
But there appear to be no real use cases other than gaming? And that’s a narrow subset of a subset of just single market. It seems that Facebook was aiming at something bigger than that but they actually couldn’t even offer a coherent argum
1090.
by ffgjgf1 3y ago
I assumed state control of Hindu institutions actually gives them advantages over other sects? (like state funding etc.) > does it mean that their secular govts should control Christian institutions in their countries? Well… that was the
1091.
by ffgjgf1 3y ago
When I last was in the US reception (especially TM-Mobile) was pretty terrible outside of urban areas and we were mainly visiting national parks in California that were full of people… I generally found reception to be better in the very sp
1092.
by ffgjgf1 3y ago
> Hindu institutions can do certain things but under restrictions that are not applicable to minorities. Again, this second-class treatment is considered to be "secular. An argument can be made than Hindu institutions are already do
1093.
by ffgjgf1 3y ago
I guess from Nvidia’s perspective a lot of those thing don’t really matter as long as the people making/using “AI” need hardware. As long as Nvidia is a semi-monopoly it’s probably one of the safest bets in that way
1094.
by ffgjgf1 3y ago
> It is only in "secular" India that organized religious conversions were allowed that led to Christians going from less that 1% of the population 100 years ago to 90% today in some states But all that happened before India was
1095.
by ffgjgf1 3y ago
How is AI related to this? Did LLMs figure how crack encryptions?
1096.
by ffgjgf1 3y ago
It probably would in case you spent significant amounts of time between the transmitters but that should be pretty easy to avoid.