ffggvv

55 ms·

601.
by ffggvv 6y ago
the cut is only for salary. the majority of comp at stripe is stock. so someone making 400k total comp may only make 160k in salary and so the cut would be 16k. (4% of total comp) But california state income tax is also 10% so it could canc
602.
by ffggvv 6y ago
the vast majority of employees just work their single job and have no side projects or gigs that would trigger a noncompete
603.
by ffggvv 6y ago
sure but then by that logic so does building more powerful computers. so intel and nvidia and amd employees are also evil. and don’t forget building a more efficient operating system
604.
by ffggvv 6y ago
having worked at them its 100% possible. esp at google because they dont really fire anyone or give them bad ratings.. literally low single digit percents. A large percent of google is coasting... they just have 1 job fb actually does fire
605.
by ffggvv 6y ago
tried searching "election" and didn't really get any useful information
606.
by ffggvv 6y ago
it’s because their economy is heavily deflationary with lack of growth. so the printing just works to cancel the deflation
607.
by ffggvv 6y ago
no offense but nz and other islands are extremely easy to control. as long as you close your border early and don’t allow it to take root in the first place, you don’t have to worry.
608.
by ffggvv 6y ago
i think its also frankly because they recruit from elite universities that push social activism and safe spaces constantly
609.
by ffggvv 6y ago
sounds like my experience at google
610.
by ffggvv 6y ago
before they had to train people because most people couldn’t afford to go to college. but when govt started handing out loans like candy, then of course the employer would rather the university train the person for them. it moves the cost o
611.
by ffggvv 6y ago
i guess it depends on perspective. i’ve had multiple offers from them for a swe role and it was drastically under my other offers. among fang they pay the lowest if honestly be making less than half my current total comp if i’d accepted any
612.
by ffggvv 6y ago
amazon is actually known for paying low salaries...
613.
by ffggvv 6y ago
lol they’re comparing it to disney and amazon. plenty of other companies pay the same or more than netflix
614.
by ffggvv 6y ago
think he released a book
615.
by ffggvv 6y ago
what do you need context for? just assume everything else is the same in the two worlds including purchasing power etc
616.
by ffggvv 6y ago
then why is virtually all of the rhetoric focused on the 1% and jeff bezos and taxing the rich? i don’t hear any concern for the poor, only hatred of the rich
617.
by ffggvv 6y ago
honest question for those whose main concern in life is income inequality: Which of the following 2 example worlds would you prefer: 1. everyone makes exactly 50k (0 inequality) 2. median income is 55k but there is vast inequality.
618.
by ffggvv 6y ago
i think bulk/volume pricing is different than selective enforcement of rules. the first is just based on economies of scale etc
619.
by ffggvv 6y ago
of course billion dollar corporations get exemptions but average app developers dont get such luxuries
620.
by ffggvv 6y ago
would’ve been much more likely to read the article if the title indicated it was an interview with the ceo of whole foods. not some random quote calling people fat
621.
by ffggvv 6y ago
then you just label anyone who disagrees with you as having those beliefs. and then you get to smugly consider them subhuman and ban them without having a single thing break your bubble
622.
by ffggvv 6y ago
to be fair both wars were started in europe
623.
by ffggvv 6y ago
my complex has like 1 or 2 for hundreds of residents
624.
by ffggvv 6y ago
yeah unfortunately i can't afford an electric vehicle until i can afford a house w/ a garage which seems like a prereq to charging it.
625.
by ffggvv 6y ago
notice everyone started attacking him first when he endorsed bernie and now even more when he made fun of biden?
626.
by ffggvv 6y ago
i think the onus on someone who wants to propose a discriminative policy to prove that it works.
627.
by ffggvv 6y ago
it’s been legal since the 70s outside of california and outcomes for minorities have steadily gotten worse not better.
628.
by ffggvv 6y ago
>> it was legal until the 90s so it was legal until then but didn’t make a dent in inequality? but i’m sure it’ll work this time!
629.
by ffggvv 6y ago
it’s a given at private schools but not public imo
630.
by ffggvv 6y ago
i think we tend to blow these things out of proportion. while it is bad, it sounds like it was 64 students.. when they had 40k students on 2019 so no this doesn’t really have a systemic effect on anybody. and perhaps the money donated actua

More ›