feraloink

7 ms·

31.
by feraloink 1y ago
Woah, this doesn't sound like over-reaction but the reporting doesn't give enough details to know: >While his actions were criminal, the judge concluded that Lidden had mental health issues and displayed no malicious intent....
32.
by feraloink 1y ago
I really like the visual of that big round teal orb surrounded by a magenta ring. It appears at the beginning and then again a little later on. Plot setting (rescue mission ...or something else TBD) is good. Only issues I had were 1. the as
33.
by feraloink 2y ago
IANAL so I'm likely missing something, but I don't understand why the person representing Google said they had won half the case, given that: >Google violated the Sherman Act by monopolizing and unlawfully tying two parts of th
34.
by feraloink 2y ago
I was getting the nginx page. It is working for me now though. Yay!!!
35.
by feraloink 2y ago
Thank you! I will.
36.
by feraloink 2y ago
Thank you! I've had trouble accessing that site *.is recently. Your link worked just fine.
37.
by feraloink 2y ago
Yes. I'm worried about that being the underlying intent too.
38.
by feraloink 2y ago
You're referring to the Space Weather Prediction Research Center website, yes? I just checked the Newsroom for NOAA SWPC. There was nothing mentioned. I also visited their social media at https://x.com/nwsswpc and htt
39.
by feraloink 2y ago
I couldn't read the entire article due to paywall. From what I did read, it doesn't seem like there is ANY alternative, none at all now, for the public to access NOAA Research.
40.
by feraloink 2y ago
I can't even imagine what the rationale would be for doing this: >The US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency is poised to eliminate most websites tied to its research division under plans for the cancellation of a cloud web serv
41.
by feraloink 2y ago
The party that is NOT pushing tariffs is the one who said, between 2012 and 2016, that "they're NEVER coming back" (referring to return of factories and manufacturing jobs). That same party DID try to bring back manufacturing
42.
by feraloink 2y ago
Manufacturers operate on a much longer timeline than 3,5 days. But your point is totally valid, about the flip-flopping. One reason might be because Trump is using tariffs as an economic weapon. Once he gets the concessions he wants (I don&
43.
by feraloink 2y ago
EXACTLY! All the excitement over more and more automation means almost no one will have income to buy anything because almost everyone will be unemployed. So what is the use of producing goods and providing services then, even at lower cost
44.
by feraloink 2y ago
>Factoring the entire global supply chain into your product, it makes much more sense to do the work in a country where work costs less. If the additional cost to import is less than the delta on labor, you've won capitalism or some
45.
by feraloink 2y ago
I think interstate commerce law is intended to minimize inefficiencies due to that? I'm not sure.
46.
by feraloink 2y ago
You don't have tariff regimes within the common market, that's true. You do have tariffs on goods that are imported from any country other than the 24 in the EEA.
47.
by feraloink 2y ago
Interesting! It says Apple investors haven't voted in favor of any proposals not endorsed by Apple management since 2022. Shareholders also rejected 3 separate proposals for Apple to write transparency reports about: the risks of its
48.
by feraloink 2y ago
Isn't it necessary to be on the Twitter platform in order to use Grok? Unlike lots of other people, I still use Twitter, but for those who don't, I would think it is an obstacle to using Grok. The advantage of using Grok (or any a
49.
by feraloink 2y ago
Hi, Elie! I read the article, then read your case study, then visited you on LinkedIn. I was amused by your custom LinkedIn URL! A few hours ago, I was replying to a post about "Gradual Disempowerment" from generative AI. My theor
50.
by feraloink 2y ago
I thought this was a bit much (although I agree with her overall message): >The social media billionaires want us to believe their putrid platforms are the “new town squares.” That their half-baked social videos and for-you feeds have re
51.
by feraloink 2y ago
Wikipedia is definitely not a public square. It is an encyclopedia. What you said, about it being >like a library with steep rules is entirely correct. That doesn't make it bad, not at all! You're right: There are very few equi
52.
by feraloink 2y ago
Very nice! Thank you much. I like it.
53.
by feraloink 2y ago
looolol! Excellent!
54.
by feraloink 2y ago
Erm... probably a stupid question but I wonder how much need there is for armored vehicles for the U.S. State Dept? In addition to the armored Cybertrucks, they're buying $40 million of armored BMW "sport utility vehicles".
55.
by feraloink 2y ago
Soooo, starting with GPT-5, they're making it more opaque by no longer letting users choose what model they use? Also, in the process of eliminating model selection, I wonder what kind of pricing will be associated with the subscripti
56.
by feraloink 2y ago
It isn't just you. I really dislike the AI slop at the top of Google search results. It is an annoying distraction that forces me to scroll past every single time, multiple times a day. Bing is just as bad with its LLM although it is a
57.
by feraloink 2y ago
Liz Fong-Jones shouldn't cite Paul Krugman citing Nathan Tankus (ugh) as some sort of expert on COBOL! Same goes for Talking Points Memo. Liz's expertise as a site reliability engineer is more than sufficient already!
58.
by feraloink 2y ago
Probably helpful to read this too https://opennote.me/labs/introducing-feynman
59.
by feraloink 2y ago
TikTok wasn't banned. It was all very confusing, I know. I gave up on following it a few weeks ago, and just read yesterday that Trump issued an executive order to keep TikTok online for another 75 days https://www.pbs.org&#
60.
AI Risk Repository(airisk.mit.edu)
1 points by feraloink 2y ago|1 comments

More ›