Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
fennecfoxy
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
91.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
6mo ago
Nah I'm gonna generate the hecky out of "relevant for this one presentation" little cliparts to add to my powerpoints. But then I'm still going to take photos on film and enjoy Sunday afternoons in the darkroom doing pri
92.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
6mo ago
Lmao, and pre-AI the world wasn't trending towards cost-reduced mass-produced executive-driven content? And the average member of our species lapping it up like being a mindless consumer is going out of style?
93.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
6mo ago
Yes, look at how many historical inventors (like the Blue LED, the guys struggling to convince Gates and Balmer to make the Xbox) etc get/got nothing for their efforts compared to the huge sums raked in by the very people actively tryi
94.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
6mo ago
No, it won't be. I did indeed get the same problems when trying to generate my own image for it. However as someone who's mucked about with local image generation as well - I'd say that this is a problem with their implementa
95.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
6mo ago
Because if it's multimodal, oops all transformers and they're pretty much best in class for ocr now, afaik?
96.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
6mo ago
Dogs don't wear suits! You must be AI too ;)
97.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
6mo ago
I mean asking these transformers to do maths has always been the wrong task. It's like we're now considering "it doesn't have x tools built with traditional code built in". Though I suppose we're testing their
98.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
6mo ago
>They are just focused on privacy Is that why they rushed out introducing AI summaries etc in order to play catch-up and then backpedaled when they exploded in customers' faces/individuals concerned in false headlines threatene
99.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
6mo ago
Omg imagine the response if it was the other... You know what, I really cannot be bothered anymore.
100.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
6mo ago
Because they've invested billions into making their own chips? And those chips have pretty damn good performance/power draw/cooling etc. I think the answer is pretty straightforward.
101.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
6mo ago
Manual focus I keep for film, I feel like it's a part of the process. But I do wish my Sony 50 was a little less noisy/slow. Suppose I should pick up the GM version at some point.
102.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
6mo ago
I feel like this is a political move between Hyundai and Google (favour by Google). BD sat back on traditional programming/light ML techniques for ages whilst transformers went wild and it's only now that they're like "o
103.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
6mo ago
Waveshare has some pretty rad ones. I've been tempted to use one of their rovers for something. Be careful, because you can easily overpay out the ass for "robot kits" online.
104.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
6mo ago
Honestly? Because capitalism.
105.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
6mo ago
I think the thing is: does it need to last 20-30 years between replacements if a robot can easily replace it + they're cheap enough to add redundant ones. Do we really need crazy accuracy even on an industrial level...like this pipe wi
106.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
6mo ago
I would look into VLAs/VLMs if you haven't already.
107.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
6mo ago
"The chip" no, a whole rack/deployment they offer takes 2.5kW. Not just one chip. Squeezing 2.5kW thru 1 chip would be mental.
108.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
6mo ago
My crotchety old neighbours just got one of those high pitched anti-fox speakers. Was mowing the lawns the other day and could still hear the high pitched tones it emits even with noise cancelling headphones on. Situation is pretty lame bec
109.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
6mo ago
Okay, Bukowski.
110.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
6mo ago
Eh they all sound like SCREEEEEHEEEEECHCCCCHEEEEEE now anyway because TFL are incapable of doing basic maintenance overnight (such as grinding the rails) without using expensive contractors that eat money up. After being in Paris over the w
111.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
6mo ago
https://archive.ph/Dyrxz Because just like Disney+, Netflix, Prime without ads, Apple TV, ... I'm not paying for a whole ass subscription just to look at 1 thing maybe once or twice a year. Especially when the majority
112.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
6mo ago
Nice word jumble, you'd make an LLM proud. But it doesn't make what you've said profound.
113.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
6mo ago
I agree. In my experience on a macbook as well it can be terrifically hard to get some models to run properly on gpu w/ ollama, let alone containerised ollama.
114.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
7mo ago
Oh yeah for sure and if they had come back with "oh yeah we only had that" (they did) I would've been like "ah okay makes sense!" But for people to react negatively to my comment in the first place is hilarious and
115.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
7mo ago
Yes turns out humans are just dumb animals with a limited attention span and capacity for knowledge. We act like we're civilised, but look at the state of the world lmao. The "me and mine" attitude applies broadly across the
116.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
7mo ago
Eh, this has happened before, is happening now and will happen again. The articles always act like the users affected were of average intelligence and or completely sound mind; I don't think that this is true at all. And there are mill
117.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
7mo ago
ESP8266 came out 2014, around the same time as the first Pi, besides the myriad of wifi enabled uc options before that. First Arduino (let's say for ease of use) with wifi built in was 2013. Lmao people already getting mad. It's h
118.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
7mo ago
No, what I'm really saying is that the baseline of plat growing is "it works by itself". Anything above letting nature take its course is a force multiplier. As opposed to other technologies; microchips do not grow on trees.
119.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
7mo ago
Meh. Plenty of landlords suck, if anything his only mistake was not making it available to others in the same building. The last apartment I rented (London) I never even met my shitty landlord hiding all the way up in Scotland. Randomly one
120.
▲
by
fennecfoxy
7mo ago
A whole ass pi just for that?!
More ›