fastest963

6 ms·

31.
by fastest963 11mo ago
That release isn't immutable
32.
Immutable releases are now generally available on GitHub(github.blog)
153 points by fastest963 11mo ago|62 comments
33.
by fastest963 1y ago
Isn't the minimum realistic prefix size you can request /64 so that devices can still do EUI-64?
34.
by fastest963 1y ago
Yeah, I don't understand how it passed DMARC and why it wasn't rejected immediately by his mail server (Apple Mail?).
35.
Android DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation Support Later This Year(android-developers.googleblog.com)
4 points by fastest963 1y ago|2 comments
36.
by fastest963 1y ago
What's the payment threshold? I assume you're paying 2.9% and $0.30 (or around there) for the transaction. You charge that to the customer but what if their bill is $0.01, are you really going to make them pay $0.32 for $0.01 of u
37.
No-cost, multicloud Data Transfer Essentials for EU and U.K. customers(cloud.google.com)
2 points by fastest963 1y ago|0 comments
38.
by fastest963 1y ago
They MITM the real sign-in on NPM. So NPM actually sent them a 2FA but the user entered it on the phishing site. The attacker then relayed that to the real NPM.
39.
by fastest963 1y ago
Just 64 characters but they do integrate with a password manager and have a 1-click button to add it. The integration was pretty seamless and saved it in 1Password.
40.
by fastest963 1y ago
If you're in a group and someone is backing up the messages, it only affects your messages in that group. All of your other chats are still secure as long as you're not using the backup frature. You (and Signal) can't control
41.
by fastest963 1y ago
Sure but the key is still in a separate location from the backup. Signal can't decrypt the backup and if Signal is hacked someone would still need to get your screenshot to decrypt the backup. Not perfect but far better than an unencry
42.
by fastest963 1y ago
I have 1Password installed and it prompted to save in 1Password. Worked perfectly. It even let me paste from 1Password on the verification screen. It was the most seamless password manager experience I've ever had.
43.
by fastest963 1y ago
With a big company like Google I'm sure lawyers are the ones preventing an open API and not the developers. The API is a liability for Google. It could infringe on patents or it could have a bug.
44.
by fastest963 1y ago
Why does the Harbor VM need 32 cores and 64GB of RAM? Especially if it's only serving 32,000 pulls over 2 months.
45.
by fastest963 1y ago
My employer uses greptile and I'm pretty happy with it. Sometimes it can be a bit overzealous but more often than not it catches real issues and gives the author a chance to reply or fix them before another human reviews the PR.
46.
Improving Bigtable single-row read throughput by 70%(cloud.google.com)
2 points by fastest963 1y ago|0 comments
47.
by fastest963 1y ago
Yes, we implemented a separate service internally that interfaces with an LLM and so the callers can be agnostic as to what provider or model is being used. Haven't needed to load balance between models though.
48.
A Tiny Middleman Could Access Two-Factor Login Codes from Tech Giants(bloomberg.com)
2 points by fastest963 1y ago|0 comments
49.
by fastest963 1y ago
Luckily GCP load balancers and Pub/Sub we're generally unaffected, at least for us, which are the 2 products we depend on the most. Messages piled up in Pub/Sub while other GCP products were down but that was it. We did uncov
50.
by fastest963 1y ago
Woops, I meant R2.
51.
GCP June 12, 2025 Mini-Incident Report(status.cloud.google.com)
6 points by fastest963 1y ago|0 comments
52.
by fastest963 1y ago
It's not clear what the actual issue was. My best guess is that Workers KV was in transition to B2 from a combination of GCS and "a storage provider" before. A step in transitioning to B2 involved removing the "a storage
53.
by fastest963 1y ago
We've been storing values on errors using https://github.com/levenlabs/errctx for close to a decade now. We have a separate logging library that stores a KV map but technically you can store anything on errors. I
54.
by fastest963 1y ago
This is already a feature called "Related Websites": https://github.com/WICG/first-party-sets
55.
by fastest963 1y ago
Including the script on the publisher's site doesn't allow them to track you from site A to site B which is what third-party cookies let them do.
56.
by fastest963 2y ago
We have a relatively modest commit with GCP, around $1M a year, and have a dedicated account rep who I can contact whenever I need to. In fact, we've had a similar relationship even when we were half the size.
57.
by fastest963 2y ago
To help avoid the hot shard problem, I wonder how capping followers per "timeline" would perform. Especially each user would have a separate timeline per 1000 followers and the client would merge them. You could still do the lossy
58.
by fastest963 2y ago
The module cache should periodically get that the tag still matches the upstream repo. If it doesn't then show a warning when installing or on the docs page.
59.
by fastest963 2y ago
The article talks about this. There are hashes that are generated for the tarball so the backend can't recompress anything.
60.
by fastest963 2y ago
We take the OAuth2 token and make a call to the People API [0] to get the Person resourceName. Not sure if this is more stable than "sub" but we completely ignore that. [0] https://developers.google.com/people&#x2F

More ›