fastball

13 ms·

241.
by fastball 10mo ago
What difference does 10 years make when you are working in a shitty factory for peanuts?
242.
by fastball 10mo ago
You don't expect AGI to be multi-modal?
243.
by fastball 10mo ago
There was no guarantee of Roadster delivery date.
244.
by fastball 10mo ago
What is the purpose of a separate /handoff and /sync command? It seems like handoff could just write learnings straight to their final destinations without needing an .inbox.md buffer in-between.
245.
by fastball 10mo ago
Safety failures are not the only type of failure.
246.
by fastball 10mo ago
You might consider the field even for other reasons (which would make your comment something of a non-sequitur), but those adjectives certainly do not apply to Trump, regardless of what you think of the man and his politics. Trump very famo
247.
by fastball 10mo ago
Money isn't real. Yes, allocating funds to this means there is a large swath of the population (with accompanying hard resources) which would work on this when they could arguably be working more productively on something else. But wo
248.
by fastball 10mo ago
Which non-immigrant crime was twisted into an anti-immigrant narrative?
249.
by fastball 10mo ago
What makes them more capable than a senior engineer with three LLM agents?
250.
by fastball 10mo ago
Is that still true if all the junior engineers are using AI?
251.
by fastball 10mo ago
"Just the requested fields" as requested by the client? Because if so that is no security benefit at all, because I can just... request the fat fields.
252.
by fastball 10mo ago
/model
253.
by fastball 10mo ago
If you pay for a Claude Max subscription it is the same price as previous models.
254.
by fastball 10mo ago
Same happened to me. You can clear it via the CLI, hilariously. ``` gh api notifications\?all=true | jq -r 'map(select(.unread) | .id)[]' | xargs -L1 sh -c 'gh api -X PATCH notifications/threads/$0' ```
255.
by fastball 10mo ago
Prescriptivists about language always lose in the end. That is the only point I am making. Words mean what people use them for, not what you want them to mean. I am not misusing the term, but people are , according to your standards. And i
256.
by fastball 10mo ago
2+2 is a mathematical concept. Definitions do not need to be agreed upon beyond fundamental axioms. The same is not true for "open source", which is a purely linguistic construct.
257.
by fastball 10mo ago
So if I invent a new license and call it "open source", they will sue me, or...?
258.
by fastball 10mo ago
> SOTA models are "trash" > this model is worse (but cheaper) > use it to output 10x the amount of trashier trash You've lost me.
259.
by fastball 10mo ago
yeahhhhhhh, that's not how this works. Unless this authority has some ownership over the term and can prevent its misuse (e.g. with lawsuits or similar), it is not actually the authority of the term, and people will continue to use it
260.
by fastball 10mo ago
What point were you proving?
261.
by fastball 10mo ago
Good job missing the point. Though given the stance you are taking in this conversation, I'm not surprised you want to quibble over that. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
262.
by fastball 10mo ago
Is there some Open Source™ council I am unaware of that bequeaths the open source moniker on certain licenses?
263.
by fastball 10mo ago
Where are you getting this compendium of commonly-accepted definitions? Looking up open-source in the dictionary does include definitions that would allow for commercial restrictions, depending on how you define "free" (a matter
264.
by fastball 10mo ago
If you are happy that time is being spent quibbling over definitions instead of actually focusing on the ideal, I'm not sure you care about the ideals as much as you say you do. Who gives a shit what we call "cancer AI", what
265.
by fastball 10mo ago
You should stand up for your ideals, but dying on the hill of what you call your ideals is actually getting in the way of that. Because instead of making the point "this license isn't as permissive as it could/should be&quo
266.
by fastball 10mo ago
*according to your definition of open-source
267.
by fastball 10mo ago
imo this is a hill people need to stop dying on. Open source means "I can see the source" to most of the world. Wishing it meant "very permissively licensed" to everyone is a lost cause. And honestly it wasn't a goo
268.
by fastball 10mo ago
Is it? The actual SOTA are not amazing at coding, so at least for me there is absolutely no reason to optimize on price at the moment. If I am going to use an LLM for coding it makes little sense to settle for a worse coder.
269.
by fastball 10mo ago
It is not hard to convincingly argue that reading the news is less useful than many participants believe it to be. You in particular getting as much value out of the activity as you think you do doesn't negate the point of the articl
270.
by fastball 10mo ago
Right, but I think that was the author's point: many of these activities are seen by their participants as "productive", rather than just "this makes me happy". That was a specific point of the post.

More ›