Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
fartsucker69
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
fartsucker69
3y ago
cant find the article anymore, but this was debunked
32.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
> Postulates major loophole in foundation of American democracy > Refuses to elaborate further > Dies
33.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
ECS can mean many things. the idea that you put components together (physically, in memory) and try to set up your processing so stuff is processed together may be quite natural. but actual ECS systems add a lot of stuff on top that's
34.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
The not right thinking part is well justified and you can find hundreds of hours of debates on youtube of religious people getting outargued like children with regards to every single argument they could possibly make for believing in relig
35.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
maybe they found it in a sumerian freezer
36.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
Who told you software dev is based on science? It's clearly based on toilet plumbing.
37.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
that's a separate thing from polymorphism vs. switch case in the post that people confuse. if he simply kept the original "unoptimized" switch case method, what you say wouldn't apply. it couldn't. from a pure featu
38.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
There is nothing more maintainable about the clean code variant either.
39.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
>The design appears to be based on the notion that most of the confounders are washing out in the propensity to seek cardiac treatment, which was a precursor for recruitment into the study What a bad assumption for a design. It should be
40.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
It's kind of obvious with how development of religion went overall. As we understood more of the world, pantheons grew smaller and smaller. There are still religions around with many gods, but their roles have drastically changed away
41.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
Such a "truest" formula doesn't really exist, or at least what you determine to be the truest is just a matter of definition and taste. For any equation it's mathematically trivial to come up with a different set of equa
42.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
Until we get evidence of such a thing, those ideas have little credibility though they are nice thought experiments. What they're really seeing is that mathematically something can be expressed with less dimensions or degrees of freedo
43.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
poor you, mentally weak hackernews reader
44.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
your post implies that - even though it's difficult to do - one could perhaps pick a good fund and be better off than investing into e.g. ETFs. the poster you're replying to implies that this might not be possible at all if the su
45.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
He was so good when he stuck to psychology. It really sucks, all of these public intellectual types think once they become popular it gives them an easy opportunity to make money by speaking about domains they clearly have no expertise in.
46.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
people talking about tech and frameworks as if it takes more than 2 weeks to switch
47.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
>What is a "meaningful explanation" of technologies we have not yet created and science we have not yet discovered The question is already not the right one to ask. Many technologies he thinks up flat out oppose our current und
48.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
Which is insanely far away and all light coming from there will have diminished in energy enough to be barely visible? Inadequate explanation. Even if the universe was a closed box with perfectly reflecting borders, what you would actually
49.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
not surprising imo, because of how limited our observational capabilities are. we'd probably progress quicker if we could look at far away stuff up close instead of from billions of light years away.
50.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
MOND mispredicts many, many past discoveries. This would have people scrambling for alternative explanations immediately. Dark matter is simply a better fit for what we see. Second, I don't know why MOND seems simpler and more elegant
51.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
even hypothetically this is only partially possible. for sure what you talk about would be something that is purely an abstract / logical problem, because if something we effectively "can't think" originates somehow in t
52.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
It's totally general in the sense that we can logically approach arbitrary problem types and there is nothing known that we can't approach with our tools of intelligence, so to speak. That doesn't necessarily mean that we are
53.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
larger metastudies have found no such correlation
54.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
Einstein was working in a patent office because he had trouble finding any work related to what he liked doing after his applications for various professorships at research universities failed. A full time phycisist already tends to work a
55.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
What do you mean by "across the singularity"? The singularity is a single point in the center. There's no being across it really.
56.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
countless reasonable alternative explanations. for example, your inner voice could simply have some lag from the processing loop where you first need to perceive your inner voice which is a process that takes time, just like perceiving anyt
57.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
Damn in my next game I'll have to make all the NPCs unvaccinated and afraid of radiation in nuclear power plant cooling tower vapor
58.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
aren't people here supposed to be educated? there have been many studies on this. tschernobyl has had no measurable impact on any health related metrics you could come up with in countries outside the ukraine. even directly at tscherno
59.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
if you really weigh against all coal plants in germany, the numbers are not far off and radioactive material is like a fraction of the problem with coal. they have much worse health impact in other areas. they're linked (directly or in
60.
▲
by
fartsucker69
4y ago
could this be solved by MS brute-force shipping all the licenses (w/ references to their original projects) of all the repos they used to train to copilot along with copilot itself? it wouldn't cover cases where people illegally c
More ›